Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Sexy Lives of Mammals

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

The Sexy Lives of Mammals

I don't have anything to do with this page, except that I think it deserves a going over before it goes to VFH. I wanted to put something on the cue for everyone to see (in a normal, non-sexy way) and here it is.   Le Cejak • <Mar 29, 2008 [12:00]>

Humour:	8	While this section may be entirely subjective, I must say that I was laughing myself silly at this article (that’s why I was unable to complete this yesterday!), and thoroughly enjoyed that work that was put into this. Only reason I didn’t give it a 10 was because the ENTIRE thing was not hysterical (which is not a bad thing).
Concept:	10	If this is not a well written satire, I do not know what is. I loved how this article presented obviously false information in what was almost a believable fashion. If that Wikipedia link was not there, I would have believed this was a real movie (DO NOT remove that link!). I enjoyed that slam on conservative Christians in “Greek Love”, and the reference to America’s Funniest Home Videos was well included. No work is needed in this section.
Prose and formatting:	7	A very well-written article from a grammatical point of view, but it hits a MAJOR snag in more places then one. First off, there are WAY too many red links, (7, to be exact!) which really injures this article. The categories, even though there are two, seems to be a bit too little (I generally recommend 3 or 4). You did do pretty well in most sections of this article, red links aside. You used ‘’’emphasis’’’ in the places where it would be well received, and wrote with a sentence structure I wish EVERY article could have. Great job with the grammar, a few snags with the prose.
Images:	7	The first image is, simply, excellent, and I loved how relevant it was to the text, hence the higher score then I would normally give, but I would honestly have expected for there to have been a second image, preferably on the left. Either upload one, or see if there is a relevant image in here.
Miscellaneous:	8	Avg’d as per Pee Review guidelines
Final Score:	40	Well, I would say that this article IS ready to be nominated for the front page, needing only minor work to finish it. Here is what I would like to see Throw in another image, this article has too much text from my point of view Fix the abundance of Red Links Add a category or two Thank you for this enjoyable read, go have a great day!
Reviewer:	Warm Regards, Javascap