Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Carrot (2nd Review)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Carrot[edit source]
Beavnation 00:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 | REJOICE! Javascap has reviewed this article! |
| Humour: | 9 | It is very clear that you put in incredible amount of work into fixing this article. I looked at the result from before you started working on it, and goodness, was it a doozy! The article now seems rather consistant on its humour, and once you make a point, you stick with your point. The quips you made about the methods of death that can be inflicted by carrots (Stabbage, most specifically) seemed to come completely out of the blue (and in a good way) It is quite clear from the reading I did that you read over HTBFANJS, and that you took care to make sure your jokes were quality. |
| Concept: | 7 | At this time, there are quite a couple of articles about food, which makes the concept behind this article hardly unique, but you carried this article much further then the sad article that was what reviewed. That is the reason I bumped it up from the median score I would have given for a five. |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | If I did not know this was Uncyclopedia, and if I did not already know what I know about carrots, I would almost believe your article. I was highly grateful that I didn’t have to suffer through any “Oscar Wilde” quotes, but sadly, every article has a few snags. Red links drag down ANY article, and this article breached my threshold of five links. Also, I did see the categories at the bottom, and I honestly think that, simply put, there are not enough categories. I would recommend placing in one or two more, the more categories, the more people will find your article, and the more people will enjoy it!
Side note: found one spelling error, details in final comment |
| Images: | 9 | I will admit that I am a bit difficult to impress with the images category, but I must say that you did an outstanding job with image placement. An article of this size I would expect to have 4 or 5 images, which you held up to rather well. Your captions were all humourous (Save for the last image, but I don’t think that one was meant to be humourous!). Another important factor I appreciated seeing was the lack of white space. Overall, a righteous tip of the hat in this department. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8.5 | Avg’d as per Pee Review guidelines |
| Final Score: | 41.5 | M’kay, as with every other review I do, a little homework for you to place in this article.
That’s about all I can find. This article, at the moment, is just about VFH worthy, but the few rough ends can easily be sorted out with a minor edit. I am very pleased to see the effort you have put into this article. Great job! =) |
| Reviewer: | Warm regards, Javascap 03:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | |