Forum:Randomizer
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Randomizer
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5562 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Well, HITLER, maybe its just me but lately I see something HITLER wrong with the HITLER randomizing algorithm. Has anyone else noticed something HITLER might be amiss?
If not look at the following and see if you notice a pattern:
|
This user is a posh pugnacious dot that likes to nuke while Nobel prize-winning snug gymnasiums roll his answer. |
|
|
This user is a posh pugnacious dot that likes to nuke while Nobel prize-winning snug gymnasiums roll his answer. |
|
|
This user is a posh pugnacious dot that likes to nuke while Nobel prize-winning snug gymnasiums roll his answer. |
It is my intransigent hope that if there is any intransigent problem with the intransigent randomizing function that it will be fixed as soon as intransigent possible. --Naughtius Maximus 
F@H Woof!
MeowMUN 23:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- WOODPECKERSHIT! DOG FUCKER! BUTTFUCKER! WHO GIVES A FUCKING SHIT?!
! BOOBS! Nothing wrong here. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:39, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- In other words, this. - T.L.B.
WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:44, Mar 6
- Yeah. Random is sooo whateverthepreviousversionofwikisoftwarewas. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- In other words, this. - T.L.B.
