Uncyclopedia:VFP/Kung-pooh.jpg

Kung Pooh (history, logs, vote page)

Featured picture candidate
Proof that the Tao of Pooh isn't something to be overlooked... Image credit: RadicalX Archive - Discuss this image

Vote	Score: 12 Ninja Bears
Nomination:	quasi-featured work by Radical X Mn-z 07:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
For Votes: 17	For Why not? --Thehallway 21:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC) nom + 4 better than what's been on here. --Mn-z 07:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Strong for - the lack of acting commitment is irrelevant, actually he just makes it look effortless... :) great pic--El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 18:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Strong For; when combined, the looks on both character's faces are absolutely priceless. Good stuff. -- The Zombiebaron 22:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For Though it'd be better if Pooh was looking at Lee. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC) I heh'd. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:21, Aug 6 Bless. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 00:53,7August,2009 Pooh looks a little distracted. Lol. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:13, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For obviously--Dinosinatra 13:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:16, 7 Aug As per Pooh dustracted. Maybe for honey. zh I hate me new sig 04:04 August 8 Yes--Shadowslayer 06:04, 8 August 2009 (UTC) For Staircase CUNt 04:06, 8 August 2009 (UTC) For. as per Zombiebaron. Though that caption could use some work. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 05:09, Aug 22 For Needs a better caption though. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 01:46, September 9, 2009 (UTC) lololooloolololol -- Roman Dog Bird 05:08, September 9, 2009 (UTC) For Per my secret ninja fetish. --Dame 13:16, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5	Against. I'm not feeling any sort of acting commitment from Pooh here. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 07:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Against. It'd prolly work better if both were either 2D or 3D, rather than one being the other. Nice joke though. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 13:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC) against. i hate to vote against 'chops by the legend himself, but it really isn't funny out of the context of the article. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:35, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Against — While there exist several good reasons to vote for this, to my mind there exists many more to vote against it. Initially, I would've voted against this, but having thought it through further, I've decided that this image isn't stupid enough. No, I'm not kidding. I say this because it isn't possible to feature image with much redeeming intellectual value. I suspect that is because when taken out of context, most don't find an image funny. And while I do love Tao of Pooh and Kung Fu humor, I know having seen the process with literally dozens of images what qualifies and what doesn't. Besides that, while this image brought about lotz of funnis the first time I saw it, I now find it, actually, lacking in humor even in-context. Besides that, I actually think this is a pretty poor chop of Winnie the Pooh, not for any executional reasons, but simply because the styles don't match. Rbpolsen ♦ 02:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC) Comment - By in isn't possible to feature image with much redeeming intellectual value, I meant in the last 2 years... I think us reviewers have gotten dumber. Trust me when I say that I'd prefer it if the featured images were smarter, but I really am not interested in changing the minds of dozens of stupid Uncyclopedians. In the meantime, I have to follow suit and represent the community instead of myself. As a reviewer, I don't represent myself, I represent the community. Rbpolsen ♦ 03:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC) don't be such a drama llama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Don't be such a llama drama (Maxis was more than enough!) 97.124.133.186 04:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC) in my sim city, i shall have a THOUSAND llamas. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 12:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC) This image might work if I didn't keep thinking the Pooh was graffiti on the wall behind the guy. 1234 ~ 05:39, 13 May 2011
Comments	Comment - Wasn't this already nominated and failed? That's what the template said. I thought I had already tried to feature this. Anyways, if not, it has my vote. Rbpolsen ♦ 01:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC) This image hasn't failed VFP since the new archiving system came into effect (over a year ago), and since I was never really that into the whole "quasi-featured" thing, I don't really know what that means (I think it means it got some votes for, but not enough to get featured, but also not enough againsts to fail). In anycase, I'm not sure why any of that should affect how you vote. -- The Zombiebaron 15:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC) And, we renom articles all the time, Filial Piety has been on VFH 8 times. --Mn-z 19:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Featured. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:38, September 11, 2009 (UTC)