Uncyclopedia:VFP/IndyWrappedmm.jpg

Individually wrapped M&M's (from OCD) (history, logs, vote page)

Featured picture candidate
NEW! Individual wrappings prevent Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Image credit: MoneySign Archive - Discuss this image

Vote	Score: 20
Nomination:
For Votes: 27	Nomination & Vote ~ MoneySign was kind enough to make this for me as a surprise. He says it's not one of his best works, but I think it's great. --T. (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2006 (UTC) For. Awesome, plus, someone would actually buy these. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 18:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC) For--Rataube 18:53, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Weak For. I love it, especially since OCD kinda runs in my family. However, it took me awhile to decipher the picture.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Enthusiastic For. But you should work "OCD" into the caption. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Sure  :) Anyone have a suggestion? --T. (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2006 (UTC) Dunno. "New for people with OCD:" maybe. I saw OCD in the header and got the joke. I just want OCD to be in the caption somehow. Doesn't need to be clever. --Rev. Isra (talk) 00:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC) For, but I sra's right. I thought it was about condoms. Kakun 23:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC) For - David Gerard 12:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC) For --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 14:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC) For Funny --Bananas21ca 01:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC) For My company had a discussion last night on whether to make these, but then we saw they were already featured here! - Birdzofafeatha For --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC) For --KWild 10:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC) For for being genuinely funny on its own without a lot of backstory -Drdisque 19:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC) More or Less For --Ghelaetalk 20:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC) For. Funny, even when you know people who have OCD. --Joe857 16:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC) For. Made me laugh out loud; just subtle enough, nice wrapper text. Sj 03:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC) For. That's a hilarious picture!(24.207.91.40 04:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)) Likely sock. --—rc (t) 06:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC) For. Good job, whoever made this!(Uncyclopedian 00:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)) Codestream SirNuke Ianweller flyingfeline Marco Raimey toratoritore §ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ Feureau ForestAngel  For. I know this sounds strange - it's less funny then other ones, but I can finally use an FP in an article I revamped significantly - M&M's, and will do so now. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Against Votes: 7	Against I don't know why ... but this just doesn't hit me with the happies.--Bradaphraser 19:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Against. Frankly, I don't like it. And this could be just because I'm in a bad mood. --Boy Toy bitch at me 20:17, 20 January 2006 (UTC) Against. - Taken out of the context of the article, it makes little sense. There should be something in the caption about OCD. --Leo 02:53, 21 January 2006 (UTC) Against. - I was neither, for or against but now that it is the size of a house it must be stoppped. i dont want 2 stay on the fence --Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM BLK |_LG8+::: 09:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC) Against - too tiny to be fun on the front page Mtu 01:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC) Against- It's familiar, which means it should be funny. But it's kind of...not. I dunt know why. Frankenberry Grr 06:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC) anon32
Comments	Featured --—rc (t) 06:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)