Uncyclopedia:VFP/Imperialism2.jpg

American Imperialism (history, logs, vote page)

Featured picture candidate
Though the United States' new strategy in Iraq has proven effective at routing insurgent rebels, it has done little to relieve the stigma of what many perceive as American imperialism. Image credit: Thetoastman Archive - Discuss this image

Vote	Score: 25
Nomination:
For Votes: 28	Nomination and for. About time for a featured image and this has been brewing on Reefer Desk for a while now. Credit also to RadicalX who touched up Thetoastman's original image -- Hindleyite 12:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC) For that looks significantly better than the first vesion, I like it. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 12:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC) For. It's five-thirty in the morning and I'm all out of witty comments.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Conditional For - the flags are the wrong way round. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Comment. No they aren't. Flags are supposed to be backwards. I can't find a link for vehicles, but this explains it for uniforms.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Ok, but the flag on the front vehicle is a bit, well, wonky. For anyway. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:38, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Strong for. It looked good in its first incarnation; it looks even better now.--Procopius 12:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC) For, this is a terrific picture.--<<>> 14:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC) For. If I didn't love this picture, I wouldn't have helped it grow into what it's become! Rad 15:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC) For "Imperialisim" heh... --The Zombiebaron 16:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Yep. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 18:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC) For If it's good enough for my article, it's good enough to vote on. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC) For --Mosquitopsu 20:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Yay The flags are backwards (intentional?), a change in opacity would have helped and a distort transformation would have made it art. But still good. -- NewMess1ah 21:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Comment If you read the above comments (and the previous ones at the Reefer Desk) you'll see that it was indeed intentional, as flags are backward on the right side of all American vehicles.--<<>> 00:55, 17 September 2006 (UTC) For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 01:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC) FORLOL!!!!--Private First Class Nappoleon V Talk Decorations02:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC) For. Just wait, a few hundred years from now, nobody's gonna be laughing.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC) For. We see them more like blood-sucking pigs, but the machines are ok too.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 20:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC) '"For'" the force is strong in this picture NuclearTerrorism Marco Raimey toratoritore Kenmcfa J. Fuckin Kyle Arachnid Feureau Richard Braintree Sunstar Kathumandu Necropaxx  For. This is something funny! Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3	Against Okay, I like this image, I really do. But those flags are bothering me - not the backwardness, but the pasted-on-ness. Fix those and I'll at least retract this vote and maybe vote for. —rc (t) 01:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC) §ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ George_VI
Comments	Featured —rc (t) 05:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Comment Is there any idea for the article yet? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC) I stole it (Well, Mhaille stole it for me) for my article A Tour of Baghdad. I think it works well there. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Comment Although normally I'd feature this image tonight, because it's been posted on VFP for such a short time I'm going to give it another day to accrue votes (which will be to its benefit in the long run). —rc (t) 06:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)