For Votes: 33
|
- Nom+for I likes this image I does.--
 » >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 06:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. It makes history come alive. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Ah what the hell! --
 CartoonDiablo
- Very much for -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me) 13:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
     13:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For --General Insineratehymn 13:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For obvious reasons.--<<
 >> 13:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. And just when I thought kitten huffing jokes were dead.---Asteroid B612
 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 15:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Nine! —Braydie 16:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For, sannse is probably the only user I know who can pull off text based jokes without making them text based jokes. -- The Zombiebaron 16:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For - Why not? --AAA! (AAAA) 16:36, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For One of these days, Sannse will have an exhibition in the Tate. RabbiTechno 18:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For, for, forRooob--91.107.184.173 12:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ooh, didn't see this here, am I allowed to vote For? I've added sources to the image page, for the curious. Now if only a certain person had written the article I made it for... -- sannse (talk) 20:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I played with the caption -- sannse (talk) 20:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I couldn't find an article in which it was used (thanks to Someone) So I couldn't think of what the caption should of been.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 02:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Earth to sannse... --AAA! (AAAA) 00:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not that one, that has waaaay too many images already -- sannse (talk) 21:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. The great kitten huffing revival of 2007? -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 20:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For.~
 22:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Original approach on an clichéed joke. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel
 [scream!] 22:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Genius in action... that is pure brilliance, and by a woman too! --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 19:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Just one comment: when the image is fully-sized, the kitten look a bit sharp.
  t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- yep, I can see what you mean there. Problem is, that the sharpness helps it look drawn. Softening it makes it start to look like a photo again. The edges could be better though, I did this before I'd learnt to use more feathering for cut-outs. I could redo it, but it would be from scratch, because I didn't save the layers (stupid). Maybe I'll get round to it sometime -- sannse (talk) 21:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Heh, in that case, just forget about it. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- For nice --
 » His Majesty King George VI (the boxes)   00:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Too good to be true! Pip pip, was that a waffle, mate? JOLLY OLE CHERRIO!!! --
 » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 15:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Looks almost real; had this not been Uncyclopedia, I would have possibly believed it. Swordmaster 21:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Very For clearly the best. absolutely. should win. --Math Poet 01:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- For kittens we huff kittens. --Greyweasel 05:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
It absolutely already did. We're still cleaned up after it. Pesky kittens. Also, use PFP for voting on things that are already featured. Like this. Because it is. I don't know if I was clear before. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Capercorn
- Madmonkey24
- The Baker St. Irregular
- Hoyman
- Tzkala
- Haigejobu
- THE
- Cs1987
- Martinultima
- Ljlego
- FOR Canner of preserves huffs it very much.
|
