Uncyclopedia:VFP/ET2-ExtremeTerrestrial.png

ET 2 - The Extreme Terrestrial (history, logs, vote page)

Featured picture candidate
E.T., Spielberg's classic Science Fiction film, joins the ranks of movies not needing sequels to get a sequel. Image credit: RadicalX Archive - Discuss this image

Vote	Score: 9 tricked out flying bicycles
Nomination:
For Votes: 15	Nom and For --Alksub 06:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC) Silly, I mean For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 10:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC) Very silly. And that's why we like it. ~ 09:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC) For. Almost as silly as the original movie, after they removed the guns.--<<>>12:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC) For, though I preferred ET3, the one where ET goes back in time and saves Abraham Lincoln. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC) For, it would be better if it had text. Maybe labels? Yah...that would rock. -- The Zombiebaron 15:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC) For I lolled when he uploaded it. —Braydie 20:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC) Quite nice. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC) For *hums the E.T. theme, electric guitar style while air guitaring* RadicalX (Holla!) 13:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 02:16, 11 May 2007 For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Savethemooses Insineratehymn Ljlego Seeker
Against Votes: 6	Against - Eh. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC) Against Helen Hairburner 01:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Martinultima ForestAngel sage --Algorithm 09:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)  Why? Btw, I must say this, it was featured 11-2 I believe.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Comments	Featured —rc (t) 04:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC) Grape -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 19:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Comment, this is a "for", apparently. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Fish. --» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 02:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Comment this is an "abstain". Isn't english fun? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC) баярлуулах євєрмєц энэ дїрслэл --General Insineratehymn 03:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Comment. You want to put your what in my where? How rude! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Unclear vote. —rc (t) 01:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC) Actually, it was a for vote. I changed the score when I posted a comment. --General Insineratehymn 00:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Right, but that means somebody has to look through the history to find the diff that verifies that it actually is a For, like Modus did above. I count the votes each time I feature something - I don't just go by the score in the image template, because people don't always remember to change it. —rc (t) 04:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC) peanut -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC) /me leaves room in a huff. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Unclear vote. —rc (t) 01:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)