Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnBooks:The Succession Speeches of Three Roman Emperors

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnBooks:The Succession Speeches of Three Roman Emperors (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnBooks:The Succession Speeches of Three Roman Emperors	Score: 14 Deranged Tyrants
Nominated by:	Winstanley1 (talk) 22:32, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
For: 14	For. Winstanley1 (talk) 22:32, July 23, 2012 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:22, July 24, 2012 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:29, 24 July 2012 Hellish yeah. Winstanley strikes back! T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:46, July 24, 2012 (UTC) For. Funnybony    17:36, Jul 24 Boner. User:Matthlock/sig2 18:58, July 24, 2012 (UTC) For. Very well written. Good period piece as well. Thanks for the laughs ShabiDOO 04:56, July 25, 2012 (UTC)  For. Don't know who these guys were but they sound plausible. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:56, July 25, 2012 (UTC) For. Lantash XVII:XXIII, Quintilis XXIX, MMXII (Julian) For Saberwolf116 (talk) 19:14, July 29, 2012 (UTC)  For. Wait, I thought I voted for this. User:Matthlock/sig2 19:25, August 1, 2012 (UTC) For. Hah, great. OliOmniOmbudsman 19:40, August 1, 2012 (UTC) Though wouldn't that be four emperors, not three. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:46, August 1, 2012 (UTC) I like it. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 18:20, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---