Uncyclopedia:VFH/The guy who always conveniently has anything needed stored in his ridiculously large 80s parachute pants (again)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

The guy who always conveniently has anything needed stored in his ridiculously large 80s parachute pants (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: The guy who always conveniently has anything needed stored in his ridiculously large 80s parachute pants	Score: 13.5
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:44, 1 September 2011
For: 18.5	For some inexplicable reason, this didn't get featured when it was originally nominated. Let's do something about that. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:44, 1 September 2011 Last time I abstained, saying I liked it but it needed more pics. Meh, maybe they're not that important. --Black Flamingo 21:06, September 1, 2011 (UTC)  I found this "For" vote in the parachute pants of the guy who always conveniently has anything needed stored in his ridiculously large 80s parachute pants. (I laughed so hard through the entire article.) ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 04:19, September 2, 2011 (UTC) For I should probably vote on this, considering it's something on VFH that I've actually read already. -RAHB 03:17, September 4, 2011 (UTC) It almost seemed to become a game of how many times can we say The guy who always conveniently has anything needed stored in his ridiculously large 80s parachute pants in one article? -- 17:27, September 4, 2011 (UTC) For. Mimo&maxus 08:06, September 5, 2011 (UTC)  For. User:DJ Mixerr/sig DJ Mixerr 23:18, September 5, 2011 (UTC) This one amused me, though I wish I could say that much for the folks who wrote it. 1234 ~ 19:41, 7 September 2011 RAHB doesn't amuse you? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:36, 7 September 2011 It's more who he was at the time. 1234 ~ 22:38, 7 September 2011 For -- The Zombiebaron 10:45, September 15, 2011 (UTC) For. A Killed Forest 00:01, September 19, 2011 (UTC) For. 122.167.241.249 19:18, September 20, 2011 (UTC) For. Naveenswiki 19:19, September 20, 2011 (UTC) For. Nice "feel-good" article. Mattsnow 19:56, September 20, 2011 (UTC)  I love the ads that mysteriously appear at the bottom    zheoliel   07:30 September 25  For. It's about the eighties, how could I not vote for it!? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 14:52 September 25, 2011 (UTC)  For. Yes, so hard. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 02:57, Wednesday 05 October 2011 - For. Yes I found this funny! Unique concept too Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 16:07, October 6, 2011 (UTC) For. Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   21:59, October 6, 2011 (UTC) For. Needs to GTFO VFH ASAP. ChiefjusticeGameBoy 14:16, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:08, September 1, 2011 (UTC) Against. Still doesn't suggest a feature to me. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:09, September 2, 2011 (UTC) Sorry. It's very zany - but "zany" does not always cross into the realm of "funny." pillow talk 22:41, September 9, 2011 (UTC) not toast's finest T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:18, September 14, 2011 (UTC) Hype speaks for me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 04:46, Oct 6 2011
Comments	Umm... penis. I'm not voting on this because I don't vote on long titles because they usually aren't funny. —  (talk) (contributions) 01:21, September 5, 2011 (UTC) Er... have you actually read the damn thing? -- 01:38, September 5, 2011 (UTC) His comment seems to imply pretty strongly he didn't. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:32, 5 September 2011 Comment. Any ballot box stuffing in the 'for' column? It is after all a Toast article... RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:04, September 23, 2011 (UTC) Looks that way. All those three after ZB made a couple edits, then voted here, then didn't edit anymore. -RAHB 19:39, September 23, 2011 (UTC) That annoying VFH thingy in the sitenotice was up around that time, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:43, 23 September 2011 Comment. I love the first three sections, but the last part doesn't flow.Must have come from the wrong pocket. But I am still a "lover". Nikau 02:50, October 3, 2011 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---