Forum:UnNewsInBrief: Vote

Forums: Index > Village Dump > UnNewsInBrief: Vote

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5826 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

This is a vote for who would like to see this idea go through and be put into the mainspace. If you would like to vote for this, please visit the page that could be the template for the mainspace page. It includes an example article. This is the link: User:Razorflame/UNIB

• 1 vote per person please.--Razorflame (contributions) Talk 02:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

What exactly are we voting for? Bearing in mind our main page has the aim of looking as much like wikipedia's as possible. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:39, 11 Nov 2007

We are voting for whether or not to include something like this in the mainspace (I did not say mainpage). I mean, should this be a feature of the UnNews part? -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 02:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Each of the UnNewsInBrief articles still has to be like an UnNews article, it just has to be shorter. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 02:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

For

1. For - I think this might work. If we have a repository for short UnNews articles, people could expand them if they're any good and ignore them if they suck. This way, we don't have to worry about crappy UnNews stubs having to be deleted, as we could simply remove them from the page. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 03:05, November 11, 2007
2. For since my UnNewseses are always really short. -- poopy Ape (lick) (Riot Porn) 19:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
3. I'm for any concept that changes Uncyc for the better. And generally anything that admins oppose. But that's another story. <3 .talk.work.?pedia.$A_{ward}^{waits}$

Against

1. Oppose. An UnNews article has to be fully written and funny.--Jtaylor1 02:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
2. No. I do not care for this at all. The same infantile idea "proposed", "improved", "regurgitated" again and again? No, no,no. Pieface 07:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
3. Let's call it semi-opposed. On the one hand, Unnews should be as worked upon as any other article, and we already have some problems in that area. This suggestion may increase the amount of short one liners. However, if you put it in a right way, as a part of the UnNews space, call it - "news flashes", it might turn out nicely. Suggest consulting with Olipro/Zimulator. ~ 09:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
4. Against as Mordillo said, it seems like a cheap excuse to let a bunch of one-liners in. We wouldn't want an UnArticles In Brief section, would we? -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS21:42, Nov 16

Waffle cone

1. Wif chocklit syrups and sprinkles!!! -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 08:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
2. Waffles! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

-1. Oppose Stale ones can be used by terrorists to stab people with. Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" ^{(cover your eyes!)} 06:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

+3. I HATE WAFFLES. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:26 Nov 16, 2007

+69. Cos it's vaguely and immaturely sexual. <3 .talk.work.?pedia.$A_{ward}^{waits}$

Sugar cone

1. What cone can compete with the cylindrical elegance of the sugar cone? Also not useful to terrorists. Hans Johnson as in "keep ya hans off my" ^{(cover your eyes!)} 06:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Not 2. Against. Not waffle. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Traffic Cone

1. Because it also doubles as a hat. -- poopy Ape (lick) (Riot Porn) 19:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)