File talk:Do a jailbait.jpg

The Image in question

Are you planning on using this somewhere? It does have humor potential, but its a bit "creepy" (and not in a funny way) just hanging around in limbo on here. --Mnbvcxz 21:30, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Is that a man in drag or a pre-op female to male situation? Whatever it's quite sexy. I say keep. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:39 28 January 2009

Um, I do believe that is a genetic female, approximately 11-14 years old. Similar to Image:Pedogirl.jpg --Mnbvcxz 21:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh. Right. Yeah. I see that now, I just presumed she was older, and a man. I'm not straight -- or a paedo! fuck off stop judging me -- SEXUALITY IS A COMPLEX ISSUE! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 21:50 28 January 2009

Looking at it, it appears "she" does have rather hairy arms and a bulge in "her" pants. And, her face is bit "heavy featured" for a female. So "she" might be a male of unknown age. I really can't tell. --Mnbvcxz 21:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

That's what I thought, because in an episode if Oz that I saw ages ago they big men dressed up the weedy one like a girl after they raped him and I thought that's what jailbait was -- so stop fucking with me! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 22:01 28 January 2009

Does the gender matter anyway? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

More than age at anyrate. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 22:03 28 January 2009

My fault! Left over from Youth purge--    22:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, made sense in context. So, it is an 11-14 year old female then? --Mnbvcxz 22:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

It really isn't. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 22:28 28 January 2009

You're saying its a shemale/crossdresser? --Mnbvcxz 22:31, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

i'm not saying anything ever again. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 22:32 28 January 2009

Seriously, do you think its a girl or a shemale? --Mnbvcxz 22:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't care. Me wanna rape! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

There is no shortage of underage girls wearing these shirts on the net. I found it equally disturbing yet appealing to my prurient interest--    22:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Removal?

Does anyone think this image should be removed? Its not that bad, by itself. However, it does give off an "E.D." feel to it, and its not currently used. And, having several of these images does create "additive creepiness" and not the funny kind of creepiness. --Mnbvcxz 22:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I uploaded, I say remove.--    22:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

No! No! I would totally do that jailbait. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll use it. Just to keep this conversation, which would be a shame to loose. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 23:13 28 January 2009

Why to prove you're bi and also like girls! --Mnbvcxz 23:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

No because I'm not and she's not -- it's the conversation I want to keep. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 23:17 28 January 2009

OK, here's the dirt.....my last job in CA I poked the 20 year old graphic designer......not young enough to be my kid at the time but close--    23:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

christ twenty, that's old enough to be my mother! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 23:24 28 January 2009

So, you are saying its a shemale/crossdresser then? --Mnbvcxz 23:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

What? I was talking about the fine gentlewoman DrS was talking about. As for the picture though I'd say maybe a shemale, it's the hairy arms and manly hands, and the slight sort of cock shaped thing in her shorts. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 23:31 28 January 2009

She was a skinny thing with pointy tits...Portugese. We went and saw Judas Priest in SF and got horny that night. If you like bananas, check out the pic on Grey Area down on the right--    23:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Orian, that was in reference to the previous comment you made, when you said, "No because I'm not and she's not". Still, I'm sorta divided on her gender. She does look shemale-ish. But, she might be a hairy girl too. --Mnbvcxz 23:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I say we ask her. Hunt her down and ask her. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 23:58 28 January 2009

How about we do a forum poll on it, like with Yettie? Or maybe, that just might be a picture of yettie? --Mnbvcxz 00:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I only just noticed the "69" shorts she's wearing. That helps my conscience by proving to myself that I didn't stare too intently at that picture. It should be on the pedo-bear website.--    10:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Going with shemale

• After doing some research on the internet, I've come to the conclusion that this is in all likelihood a shemale. Since there is evidence of partial "transitioning", I would say she is around 20 or so. --Mnbvcxz 16:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

  Whew that's sort of a relief. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:01 30 January 2009

  YAH!!! that means your not bisexual and Dr. Strange isn't a pedophile. --Mnbvcxz 17:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

  I'll cut off any left-over male parts and rape it nonetheless. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

  What's your obsession with removing the male parts? Couldn't you just butt-rape her/him? --Mnbvcxz 17:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Unsigpost story on this that I just made up

In Uncyclopedia:UnSignpost/Press Room, last header (link to header won't work, probably too much code). I need "reaction quotes" like, "OMG, I'm glad I'm not bi/a pedophile" stuff. --Mnbvcxz 17:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, that got the pic out of the unused image category. --Mnbvcxz 05:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

That was my vow. Though I'm not sure why, I just feel dirty after this whole fiasco. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 05:51 31 January 2009

If it makes you feel better, she is almost definitely above the age of consent. Shemales can look like young girls really easily. And, I'm almost certain she's a shemale. --Mnbvcxz 06:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah but it's still a she male -- I have prjudices too you know! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 06:12 31 January 2009

Well, your still mostly gay, its not like you were attracted to a real female or something. --Mnbvcxz 06:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

I only apreciate the male form. None of this bastardisation. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 06:51 31 January 2009

Why don't you go look at pictures of the female form that you find unattractive, like my super secret girlie page? It might make you feel less bi. --Mnbvcxz 19:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Yuck, yuck, yuck! That's just twisted. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 20:05 31 January 2009

The page, or the idea of intentionally looking at straight erotica you find disturbing to make yourself feel gayer? --Mnbvcxz 20:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Needs new category

This image should go to a category called "Jailbait". Or am I wrong? And by the way, don't some girls have hairy arms too? They may have, but they aren't shemales. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 08:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

First off, look closely as her crouch. As you can clearly see, she has a huge penis. Most teen/pre-teen girls don't have penises that large. Therefore, this is a shemale, and probably in the 18-21 range. Young (as in 20 +/-) shemales often look like young girls, especially when the pic doesn't give evidence of their height. The "girl" in question could be over 6 feet tall for all we know.,

Secondly, we really don't need to have a category underage girls in questionable poses. This isn't E.D. --Mnbvcxz 16:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I couldn't see any bulges on her crotch. Or anything that shows a penis. I just couldn't see a thing. She looks perfectly like a girl to me. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 08:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Hell even I know what a girl looks like and I never even look at them. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 08:40 2 February 2009