User talk:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/Archive12

                                                 

IRC invite

Wow, Im like the pic on your userpage! 0.0 For once, I would have meaningful things to discuss, if you have time to join IRC. Mattsnow 15:35, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Sure. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:41, 28 August 2011

I took the liberty to add on the nom for VFH "This article was written by the Frozen Mammoths and Magic Flamingos" Thanks bro. I wouldn't have asked you that if I didn't think we can't really improve it any further, as I know Pee Review is clogged. (I did a Pee yesterday on Shabidoo's article, User:Shabidoo/UnNews:Bad things have happened recently). Just to show I do my part, and I am great and awesome and wonderful and amazing and incr Mattsnow 18:25, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Here is your movie

From —  (talk) (contributions) 17:00, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Interesting. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:23, 28 August 2011

Nice formatting fuck up. You are a sock and I am snow. It is inconvenient to have snow in your sox. Mattsnow 20:02, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Xactly —  (talk) (contributions) 21:01, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

Yo

Yo, it's your pick, yo.--<<>> 19:09, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

I'm on my way. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:19, 28 August 2011

BUTT POOP!!!!

I was just going to plop my .02¢ about the VFD vote in the forum and, sadly, it's been locked from further editing. Simply put; total shit or not, nobody should push through a deletion in 3 hours. I agree with the 24 hour rule.--    20:08, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

You incorrectly punctuated BUTT POOP!!!! --Mn-z 20:56, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

Happy? lol!--    21:27, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

We shot the hole-in-one, but you were the caddy!

It appears that you nommed and voted for Mini-golf, which ended up getting featured. Myself and Matthew Snowman would like to thank you from the bottom of our hearts (well... maybe somewhere around the middle, but you get what I mean) for carrying the club all the way to the front page. Hope your career as a caddy is long and prosperous. Thanks again. -- 02:58, August 31, 2011 (UTC)

Hi man!

What's up? Who are the new admins and who are the ones that left uncyclopedia? tell me all the news about the place. I am Mimo&maxus but I'm too lazy to sign in. :) --178.128.54.51 15:47, September 1, 2011 (UTC)

Have you heard Lyrithya and me got opped? Well, no one else got opped since. And old admins are appearing and disappearing at such an alarmingly random rate it's pretty hard to say who's here and who's not. Oh, and RAHB is back. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:52, 1 September 2011

Template:BUTT POOP!!!!

Perhaps you should just unilaterally restore it, since some people are acting like a 3-hour IRC-chat rigged VFD vote is unchangeable even when it is clear that about half the wiki wants to restore the template. --Mn-z 00:00, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

But if I apply the same crude method as our adversaries, the terrorists win! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:06, 2 September 2011

Typical Belgian response. --Mn-z 00:13, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Question

What is drama? 1234 ~ 01:35, 2 September 2011

Wrong question. What you should be asking is "Who is Drama?" —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:49, 2 September 2011

Pooping in butts

I'm not going to keep revert warring you, so I'm just going to outline it pretty plainly here: I'm protecting the forum topic again, nothing is being restored, and if you decide to combat either of those decisions, I am going to deop you. You've more or less utterly failed to maintain the responsibility of an administrator, so consider it a blessing that I am not going to take action against you instantaneously. There's going to be no discussion on Butt Poop again because there's already been a crazy amount of discussion on the useless, awful page. There won't be more. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:47, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, if you're going to insult me outrightly, I might as well leave forever outrightly. Constantly being treated as a vastly inferior being kinda takes the fun out of the site, you know? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:53, 2 September 2011

Don't leave. —rc (t) 18:43, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

I'll try. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:44, 2 September 2011

I'll ban you if you do. —rc (t) 18:45, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

That's... nice of you. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:47, 2 September 2011

OK, I can understand the decision to delete the file and "protect" the forum but "There's going to be no discussion on Butt Poop again..."??? I think that's an over-reach of epic proportions. Are you capable of logically defending that statement or are you just going to play authoritarian on that? The only reason I'm bothering is because I know you're wrong. Frankly, your tactics are actually keeping the discussion alive instead of simply letting the subject die on its own - not very smart IMO.--    18:52, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Also: I've see tons of outright crap that I'd like to outright delete on this site with zero discussion but I learned a long time ago that it's not MY site - merely a collective of the people who contribute. When you lose sight of that, you're just a content national socialist. The fact that you've even mentioned "there's already been a crazy amount of discussion..." about BUTT POOP!!!! should be telling you something but I guess you just don't want to hear it. Let them eat BUTT POOP!!!! I guess?? Why in the heck would you want to lose respect over one stupid page and or template? That's what you're doooooing!--    19:05, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Have I deleted butt poop? No. Should it have been deleted on sight? Maybe, but I'm not contesting that because VFD already decided. And because VFD (as an extension of the community) decided, in all instances of butt poop, there really is zero need to revive a discussion that has already had plenty of opportunities to go nowhere. Hell, once it even did result in compromise (remember the 24 hour VFD timer?), so isn't that enough? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:18, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Odd how you consider making VFD more fair and not allowing things that were unfairly deleted previously a chance to be restored a sufficient compromise. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:22, 2 September 2011

You know why that isn't a fair compromise? Because consensus has decided against it. Repeatedly. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:27, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Do you compromise? 1234 ~ 19:47, 2 September 2011

Look, I don't know what this whole mess about BUTT POOP is (personally, I hate that page but that's another story) but I simply don't seem to understand how TKF can claim there's been a "consensus" over the issue when people are still upset about it. From what I've heard, the original template was deleted within just a couple of hours thanks to votes piling on due to incessant whoring on IRC. There's no question that this pissed people off. Socky's just trying to right the wrongs he perceives to have been done with the template, and that too without being a dick. And here you come, protecting the forum page, accusing Socky of being a crappy admin, and even starting a vote to de-op him. This confrontational, hostile way of handling the situation is precisely what will end up escalating it. --Scofield & Friends 19:55, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

The original consensus was from before you joined, I believe, with the 24 hour rule being born of that, among other things. It has already been discussed half to death, however, and remains a sore point among many. Bringing it up again now simply serves no purpose when there are so many other things folks could be doing, and even helps prevent other folks from doing that. 1234 ~ 20:09, 2 September 2011

What Scofield said. lol! OK, I spoke to you both on IRC and I'll pretty much stay out of this fiasco, I've pretty much said all there's to say on the matter. I just think that more drama from the admin side will draw more user drama into the fray. Can't wait for the big VFD drama when BUTT POOP!!!! Jesus gets resurrected for another vote. Let the campaigning start.......NOW lol! The torture never stops. Just saying "move-on" brings out the punk rock anarchist in people unfortunately. Hey, it sucked me in and I didn't even orgasm. --    20:13, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

Quite ironic how the non-admins are playing the voices of reason in this drama. Maybe we should get to vote on whether ol' Socky should be de-opped too! --Scofield & Friends 20:44, September 2, 2011 (UTC)

You mean like this? Oh wait, that's protected. I guess TKF really likes protecting things. >.< —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:46, 2 September 2011

IRC

Want to get on IRC to discuss some things, just you and me? I'll bring the biscotti, you bring the espresso. —rc (t) 17:01, September 3, 2011 (UTC)

Sure thing. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:06, 3 September 2011

You, sir...

...are a lovable sock-monkey. I hereby declare my undying devotion to you.

If they ever succeed in de-opping you, or harass you into leaving, I shall leave with you.

⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 10:37, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

“Who died?”

~ Oscar Wilde, regarding this template

Felicitations

It is apparently de rigueur to spam a user's talk page with templates, if that user has voted for your article on VFH, or has other-services render'd. As you have apparently done something of this sort, here is your reward: a plain, black box with white lettering, thanking you in a generic fashion for what you have done.

(Signed) Bizzeebeever

P.S. Yes, your suspicions are correct, this template is utterly unoriginal.

Thanks, Bizzeebeever. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:39, 4 September 2011

Fantasy Football Primer

Just a few things to help you get up to speed:

As soon as the draft is finished, Guildy will populate the Yahoo league with the players we've drafted and then the week to week schedule will be automatically set by Yahoo. You'll be able to navigate your team's page and look at all of the news and advice for your players.

Pay attention to the NFL schedule: You'll be able to see which of your player's NFL teams will have a "bye week" by clicking on the individual week's number located on your team's home page. No teams will have bye weeks in 1-4. Weeks 5,6,7,8,9 and 11 will have teams that do not play (for some reason there are no teams on "bye" during week 10). So, you may want to look ahead and see which weeks that your fantasy team might have a substantial amount of players unavailable.

Free Agents: Any player that goes undrafted will be available to be picked up as a free agent. You will be able to see a list of them by clicking on the "available players" tab on your Yahoo team page - which will include sortable stats. Important note: If you wanted to draft a free agent that will be available for week 5, you MUST make that move before the start of the first game of that week. Some weeks will have the first game on a Thursday (like week one) so if you don't make a free agent move before the first game begins, the player you want will be secured but unavailable for play until the following week. Keep an eye out for undrafted players that are producing points due to any number of reasons, such as an injury to the normal starter for that position. I personally keep an eye on key injuries to RB's and will draft their successors if I know they're going to touch the ball a lot - even if it's to keep them out of the hands of the competition.

Feast or famine: NFL football is incredibly difficult to predict, so even the "expert opinion" of football analysts can lead you astray. NFL teams do an incredible amount of film watching to come up with game plans against a competitor. Sometimes what is perceived as a good player to start in your lineup ends up being a bust for some games due to the game plan and sometimes just dumb luck. Players that aren't producing early in the season can suddenly become fantasy studs later in the year. Example: Last year I drafted Sidney Rice (WR for the Vikings last year) and the first 4-5 weeks he didn't do a damn thing. I never started him and eventually dropped him in exchange for a free agent. A couple of weeks later, he turns into a fantasy stud after being picked up by someone else in the league. Drat, foiled again!

However, some lineup changes are more or less no-brainers. If you have a RB whose team is facing the best run defense in the league or a WR who's team is facing the best pass defense in the league, it's probably a good idea to look into the possibility of starting a different player with a better matchup. You can look up statistics on the Yahoo NFL page in the "stats" tab. Here's a look at last year's team defense stats against the run (RB's) [1] So, the Pittsburgh Steeler's defense were awfully good at stopping other teams from running against them LAST YEAR. Emphasis on LAST YEAR.

Of course, this is all incredibly anal retentive stuff for fantasy football geeks. You don't have to spend nearly as much time agonizing over your starting lineup like Guidy and the rest of us who have been raised on American Football. Just wanted to give you a taste of what we do to prepare - which should give you the basic tools for being competitive in the league. Simply following the expert advice on who to "sit and start" will help you. They have a "star system" on the Yahoo team page that you can look up fore the best players to start - according to the experts.

Good luck!!--    11:07, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Your team is all loaded and ready to go. Just drag and drop your players into their positions and hit "submit". You'll notice that kickers and defense have their own windows below. The system is pretty much error proof, it won't allow you to put anyone in the wrong place. Note: If you have nobody playing in the first game Thursday, you don't have to do a thing. A player gets locked in the starting lineup, or on the bench, only after kickoff time for the individual teams games. So, that allows you to change your mind and possibly tinker with unlocked slots or players in your lineup after the early games (1:00 EST Sunday) have started. Other start times will be 4:00pm EST Sunday and there's usually one game late Sunday night and one Monday night. During the season, we anal retents pay close attention to injury reports that come out right before game times and sometimes make last minute roster decisions. Sometimes, a player will be banged up a little (from the week before) and you won't know until 15 minutes before game time whether certain people will be playing or not. You'll also see a little yellow sticky-note type icon next to a player's name that you can click on for news and/or analysis - sometimes helpful, sometimes not so helpful. Again, good luck! --    20:32, September 7, 2011 (UTC)

Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

You voted for Colorless green ideas sleep furiously on VFH. Maybe now us ideas will be a little less furious.

Thank you! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 11:41, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Kind of psychotic

Well, sometimes I have an idea and it ends up exactly as planned, sometimes I have an idea and the end product doesn't resemble the original idea too much. So much for a rewrite on the abortion article, looks like I've merely used the graphics and made something completely different. A couple more days of adding, brushing up, linking and it'll be done. --    09:07, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

That looks... interesting. I wonder how Glenn Beck would feel about that article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:15, 6 September 2011

Part of his "charm" is making absurd analogies - that and fear mongering about economic apocalypse. On his TV show, he always used a chalkboard that was a convoluted mess of ideas that somehow linked together. --    11:20, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

Fear mongering aside, though, it's true that the current economy isn't exactly the most sustainable one. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:27, 6 September 2011

OMG SOCKY SAYS WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!    Orian57    Talk   11:49 6 September 2011

Nah, the people buying gold and silver will survive. All the rest of you buggers are gonna die of sheer poverty, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:52, 6 September 2011

Well here in the US, part of the problem is the fact that executive pay continues to grow as if there's no economic problems. The bulk of the workforce is either not working or seriously underpaid - which means less spending and less demand. Hate to sound Commie but there's plenty of money to go around, it's just all in the hands of a tiny minority of people who appear to want to roll back environmental protection and worker's rights to the 19th century. Yeah, we're headed for doomsday all right. May I lick your arse more deeply and passionately than ever before M'lord?? --    12:08, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, now we're talking. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:11, 6 September 2011

Hey man, how does one remove an article from pee review anyway? Now that I've had a few days to tweak and add a little, I'm pretty much happy with the article - besides, it appears that there's not a lot of pee going around these days and August is loaded with articles still waiting for those golden drops from heaven.--    19:18, September 9, 2011 (UTC)

I went ahead and closed the pee request for you. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:35, 9 September 2011

Now that the VFH list is getting short.....any chance of throwing this to the lions for me? It won't offend me if you'd rather pass - eventually Aleister or someone will end up doing it. On another note, I might just finally finish Images (something you inquired about awhile back), since I'm just not feeling inspired to start anything new at the moment. I'm trying to figure out something for PLS though. I have an UnTunes in the works but I'm not sure if my voice is going to cut it. It's a slightly deranged homoerotic version of Peter Frampton's "Show me the way". I thought RAHB's voice wasn't that bad but "We didn't start the fire" isn't much of a test for vocal range. Any suggestions for someone else capable? I'm going to give it a shot myself but I'm expecting to not like the results.--    13:47, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

Well, besides RAHB, it seems everybody else who could record an audio for you (Sonje, Zana Dark, SPIKE, Dexter111344) is probably gone for a long while. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:28, 15 September 2011

Last I checked, Zana is permabanned. Kind of sucks but I'm out of the loop on her transgressions. I know she had some "adminosity" (hey, did I just make up a word?!) issues. --    14:37, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, she kind of went totally nuts when Chief was deleting a couple pages with her templates on it. I believe it were welcome templates on talkpages that belonged to vandals. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:40, 15 September 2011

Hey Socky

Tell me ... why did the quadriplegic mongolian kangaroo cross the road? --ShabiDOO 12:17, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

It did? That's a miracle! God exists! I knew it! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:18, 6 September 2011

Precisely my son. Now go spread the good word! --ShabiDOO 12:19, September 6, 2011 (UTC)

Will do. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:05, 6 September 2011

Anaconda Plan

A man, a plan, an anaconda, Panama. Thanks for protecting this fine page of fine writing by fine people. This is a page sitting on the cusp of greatness, as it can be expanded to get in much more data about the U.S. Civil War and the era it was fought in without losing the comedy of wrapping the data around the snake. It could be a History of Great Britain for the Civil War, only not as long. I'll do a few minutes work on the page, but not enough to make the IP's rustle. Thanks again!!!!!!! ???????? Aleister 18:42 7-9-'11

No, problem, Aleister. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:50, 6 September 2011

You're wrong. There is a problem. And the problem is you Socky, you should resign immediately. Yeah. That's it. Now begone with you. Darken these doorways no more forever. No problem, you say? Ha! Problems aplenty as I read the forums. And why? I dunno. Hey, thanks again. Anaconda Plan is on my radar for greatness, aye. I'm almost outahere for today. More next time that I darken these doors myself. Aleister 19:01 7-9-'11

Eh, I'm in denial, I guess. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:08, 6 September 2011

Olympian Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my fourth featured UnNews piece.

I appreciate it, and stuff.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 12:35, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

---

WHAT???

DUDE BBJ IS A POPULAR COMPANY (BBJ-BBJ.webs.com)!!! and btw ur picture is SO innapropraite – Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach8604 (talk • contribs)

Socky can't help the way he looks... and shouldn't either. --Black Flamingo 00:55, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Aww, thanks Black Flamingo. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:03, 10 September 2011

men With Breasts are SO Offensive. and Offensive Stuff Is Like Tottally Innapropraite On A Parodie Website. you Should Tottally Take It Down Sockipoo And You Should SO Ban Yourself Until You Understand HTBFANJT And Find An Arctile Of You On Wikipediya. --ShabiDOO 01:21, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

I like what you've done with your capitalization. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:25, 10 September 2011

i Went To School And School=Awsome. And so, I=Awsome. did You Go To School Sockipoo? do You=Awsome?? --ShabiDOO 01:47, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

I'm definitely awesome, yes. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:56, 10 September 2011

Fuck you, Shabidoo! I INVENTED that type of reasoning! ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 17:46, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Dude.....120 points

That's a super awesome week using this scoring system. You basically want at least 80 points each week. I'll probably fall short of that mark - bad matchups in week 1 for me. It happens. Some key players had their offenses stifled. ATL, TB, etc. 100 points gets you a win 90% of the time and 120 is almost impossible to beat but once in awhile two peeps have big games while matched up. There's nothing like scoring the 2nd highest amount of points in the league (for that week) and walking away with a loss. It happens. Well, for now, YOU'RE NUMBER ONE! Overall points scored is also the first tiebreaker for teams with the same record - which will definitely come into play when playoff seeding time comes around.--    10:28, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

Woohoo! I'm first! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:18, 12 September 2011

Request

Wondering if you could do article for me, Universal Soldier which would be jokes based on the movie of the same name as well as a article on Jean-Claude Van Damme. – Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUnbeholden (talk • contribs)

Here is a bold new idea. You. Could. Do. It. Yourself. YES YOU COULD WRITE AN ARTICLE, GO FORTH!!! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:13, September 15, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, what Frosty said. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:19, 15 September 2011

Yes, I won!!

It's ridiculous, but thanks to concussion magnet Mike Vick, I barely won! ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 17:47, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:19, 20 September 2011

NO! NOT AN IMAGE IN THE HEADER!

Phonics. —  (talk) (contributions) 22:07, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Wut? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:25, 20 September 2011

LEARN YOUR PHONICS. You said - "woot". Say "what", y'asshole. —  (talk) (contributions) 22:46, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

No, I said "wut". If I wanted to say "woot" I would've said "woot", not "wut". For that matter, if I wanted to say "what", I would've said "what", not "wut". —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:49, 20 September 2011

HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAJOR IN SPANGLISH???? —  (talk) (contributions) 23:03, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Spanglish isn't a proper language, silly. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:07, 20 September 2011

Why can't it be? —  (talk) (contributions) 23:25, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Because. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:27, 20 September 2011

Since el door es in la puerta? Or I hate indenting? —  (talk) (contributions) 23:33, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

It's because people like to discriminate against Hispanic people. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:39, 20 September 2011

We had found FFW abuse- I am serious.

Remember the Forest Fire Week we had last month? I need to bring up this problem to your attention. Why? I'll tell you:
Lollipop told me on the Village Dump that some users that participated in Forest Fire Week randomly clicked (and in my own words, abused) the FFW tag and/or anything that is FFW related for the purposes of gaining more FFWs than others. Some of the FFW-tagged articles that are later deleted are considered as humorous. I want you to create a solution so that future abuses of FFW do not happen again. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 07:23, September 21, 2011 (UTC)

Instead of consulting the one person who was against the whole notion, why not create a forum about it, so others can put in a word? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:28, September 21, 2011 (UTC)

Or, instead of bringing up "problems" with an event for which planning began over 3 months ago, you should read the aftermath forums where everybody has already agreed the FFW will be run differently in the future. -- The Zombiebaron 07:41, September 21, 2011 (UTC)

If there's any specific abuse you had in mind, please report it to the admins. Oh, and Zombiebaron wants you to read Forum:FFW 2011 Aftermath. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:58, 21 September 2011

Thanks thanky thanks

Thanks for all the fixer upper things on Corpsesarian, you made it into a corpse-o-delicious article. Aleister 16:08 21-9-'11

And thank you for writing such a delicious article to munch on. : D —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:48, 21 September 2011

And you voted for Sandwich! You like me, you really like me. I will send you a friendship bracelet in tomorrow's post. {thanks thankidy thanks too!) Your bud, so first toke to you, Al 18:21 21-9-'11

That sandwich was delicious too! Mmm... —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:28, 21 September 2011

Template madness

Hi Socky! I just went on a watchdog tour to see if any of the articles I wrote have been vandalized only to find out the on the George Carlin article, the template is messed up but nobody did this, since nobody edited it since it was featured. Could you take a look and see what you can do about that when you have time? It'll probably take you 30 seconds to figure it out, while it could take me months! Cheers. Mattsnow 09:45, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, apparently someone had been messing with the taxobox template. All fixed now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:34, 28 September 2011

Thanks Sock! Mattsnow 11:06, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

The pleasure was all mine. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:01, 28 September 2011

Something about that template was breaking pages. Perhaps the matter has been resolved on (and in which case was was probably caused by as well) another end, or perhaps it was more page-specific to some others, but if you could keep an eye on it, it'd be appreciated. 1234 ~ 15:44, 28 September 2011

The most noticeable change you did was changing all the parameters from optional to required. If Wikia managed to screw up all the optional parameters, we'd be in for some serious shit. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:59, 28 September 2011

All I did was revert the addition of the parser functions, which were acting weird on an article someone forwarded to us on IRC or something. Maybe they aren't closed, or maybe, considering how this template has been around and in use a lot longer than those have been in the template, it was workarounds on already existing articles using the template causing issue - workarounds do tend to interfere with each other. Also, for the record, we already are in for some serious shit, though it doesn't appear to have anything to do with this extension. 1234 ~ 16:22, 28 September 2011

Is "{{#ifeq:{{{something|none}}}|none||" the usual way optional parameters are coded? Especially the use of "none" in there. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:29, 28 September 2011

No, usually it's just done by using an {{#if: {{{input|}}}|stuff}}... which now that I think about it, is probably why I got confused before; why in tarnation did that user put in that extra ifeq stuff? Not that that changes how it should work, nor that it clearly didn't work at the time. If it works now, then no matter. Just keep an eye on them, will you? Some of them may very well still not work with that for other reasons. Or not. Depending on what the problem even was. 1234 ~ 16:42, 28 September 2011

So, you two are talking again, even after the bad breakup. Better people than me, that's for sure. Did you have make-up sex? Video? Aleister 16:25 28-9-'11

On the contrary; I think he's horrible and his hair looks like beet roots and he says I smell. 1234 ~ 16:27, 28 September 2011

You do smell. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:29, 28 September 2011

I was hiding in the closet and filmed the whole thing, Aleister! I put it on Youtube under the following title: "Touching and passionate reconciliation moment" Go have a look :P Mattsnow 16:34, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

See?! 1234 ~ 16:42, 28 September 2011

"Oh, God! But why...in the balls?"

Thanks for the VFH vote on UnNews:Alaska woman wins 2011 International Punching-A-Bear-In-The-Face Championship. Here's hoping the coming world-wide bear uprising spares you!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Sep 28 '11 18:47 (UTC)

Wrong

Um would you mind adding a reason to deleting my template? --Zeanobia 09:05, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

"The only purpose this could serve is template spam. Template spam is bad." Nice reason, huh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:09, 29 September 2011

It can also be a sister template to Editme as of using it on articles where there really a reason to but no rules to kill it with.

Fx.

Poop is good as food Eww huh? --Zeanobia 09:16, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

Well, why don't you use {{Editme}} then, instead of creating your own less esthetically pleasing version? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:46, 29 September 2011

Because i admire Hollywood and wanted a way to inplant his quote and that was the best i could come up with --Zeanobia 09:50, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

You admire huge amounts of money being spent on making movies as opposed to it being spent on something that's actually useful to humankind? To each their own, I guess. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:54, 29 September 2011

No not that hollywood, THIS hollywood [2]

--Zeanobia 10:00, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

Redirected page

Hi, S. o. a. u. u. I want to create an article about vanilla ice-cream, but the page is already created and make a redirect to a vanilla ice page, which is non-related to ice cream anyway. How to remove the page for creating another article? Thanks. Palaxzorodice 09:20, October 1, 2011 (UTC)

Right, do you see the (Redirected from Vanilla ice) below the title? Well, click the link and it'll bring you to the redirect page. You can edit the redirect page and by removing the #REDIRECT:[[]] part, you can start writing your own article. Good luck, Palaxzorodice. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:24, 1 October 2011

New voting pages and stuff

• Hey Socky. I was gonna point this out in your latest forum topic, but I thought that maybe it would be best if I put this on your talkpage. I hope you realize that as an admin you have the power to create a voting page for undeletions. I don't wanna come off as aggressive or start a fight or nothing, but maybe it would be best if you created that voting page now and then delete your new forum topic that is really just a continuation of an old drama topic. Thanks! -- The Zombiebaron 22:13, October 2, 2011 (UTC)

  I would happily do that, Zombiebaron, but don't you think that would be another instigation for further drama? That's why I'm asking folks in a forum. If I can get people's approval for something, the thing can be created without any drama having to occur, but if I create the thing out of the blue, another admin can easily say "Nope. This isn't gonna happen." and delete it. Which would be yet another possible source of drama. No Zombiebaron, I don't think me waving around my authoritative admin wand is gonna do this issue any good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:47, 2 October 2011

  Excuse me for my ignorance on this subject, I haven't really been following most of the recent discussion about undeleting pages. However, if you believe that there is a legitimate problem, you should fix it. Perhaps you can start out creating the voting page in your userspace and running it yourself? If you run the voting page in good faith I find it hard to believe that anybody would have a problem with it. -- The Zombiebaron 22:59, October 2, 2011 (UTC)

  I'm grateful for your faith in me, Zombiebaron, but people's reaction to my good faith efforts are not always very positive. Furthermore, I don't see any harm in letting people discuss their sentiments on the issue. If you're afraid of old drama being revived, I'll gladly enforce bans on anyone caught reviving it, if that's what you want me to do. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:48, 2 October 2011

  I just think that at this point more discussion will get us nowhere. What we need is for something to resolve this issue. Many users have expressed an interest in a formal undeletion process. As the most vocal admin on this subject you are probably the best qualified to resolve the problem. -- The Zombiebaron 00:01, October 3, 2011 (UTC)

  Can you blame me for being reluctant given the recent amount of drama surrounding my person, though? As for there being no point in further discussion, most of the discussion so far was limited to votes on either a vague option of bringing articles back in a more official way or using VFD for undeleting articles. Pretty much everything besides that was just irrelevant drama. For one thing, I'd like people to tell me which of the three options I mentioned they'd prefer. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:10, 3 October 2011

  I for one would prefer that the undeletion process be allocated to its own separate page, titled Votes For Undeletion, where the community could vote on whether a previously deleted article (which would at that point be saved in somebody's userspace) would be allowed back into the mainspace. Perhaps if you do not feel comfortable setting up this page by yourself, you should enlist the help of other admins. I suggest contacting Mhaille, I know he'd probably want to help resolve this issue. -- The Zombiebaron 00:22, October 3, 2011 (UTC)

PLSSSSS

I only noticed this after it all happened, but, because you edited that Indiana Jones and the rar rar rar page, does that make it ineligable for the competition? I know it was just spelling, but... --Nikau 00:36, October 3, 2011 (UTC)

Well, if it's up to me it'd still be eligible, but you'd have to ask an admin more involved in the running of PLS, like ChiefjusticeDS. If it's really an issue, we can always claim it was a collaboration. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:44, 3 October 2011

cool. If shit starts I will. Speaking of shit, I saw the deopping forum do. As a casual user who isn't here often, there are two things I care about, being able to write in peace and that the featured material is funny to someone with no onsite knowledge. That means only people pushing their - or their friend's - stuff on the front page unfairly, vandals or abusive members should be de-opped. Socky has not done any of these. --Nikau 03:03, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, man. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:42, 5 October 2011

KInd of odd

I was just checking to see if I left any drafts in userspace and found this, written over a year ago. It's finished and actually seems funny. What think you?--    20:10, October 4, 2011 (UTC)

I've lured it into my van and am taking it to VFH headquarters right now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:43, 4 October 2011

You voted for Subliminal stimuli, which got featured!

A million thanks! -- 03:41, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

 

Hi, sock! Could you move User:Bizzeebeever/The Shining to User:Bizzeebeever/Articles/The Shining? I'd do it myself, but I don't have suppress-redirect ability. Thanks!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 8 '11 10:59 (UTC)

Sure thing, Bizzeebeever. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:01, 8 October 2011

Hey guys...could one of you please tell me what "suppress-redirect" actually means. It sounds like a scarry proceedure that could chop off my hand if Im not careful! --ShabiDOO 11:15, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

It's where a page is moved, with no redirect being created. Non-rollbacks can't do it, and maybe even non-admins can't do it. Not sure. Oh, btw, thank you, Commander Sock.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 8 '11 11:17 (UTC)

Yeah, rollbackers can do it too. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:18, 8 October 2011

Oh...that's not as giant a tool as it sounds. Can't you just move the page and put the original one up QVFD? Or am I missing something here!? --ShabiDOO 11:27, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

Yes you can, but not creating a pointless redirect that'd get deleted anyway is... less pointless. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:29, 8 October 2011

Redirect-suppression has a second, more-esoteric purpose: it creates a small rift in the space-time continuum, through which small crab-shaped body-snatchers can emerge. It's a conspiracy between the Church of Scientology and Opus Dei to destroy this universe from the inside out. Happy now, Shabbs? :)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 8 '11 11:34 (UTC)

So it is the cosmic tool I thought it was. That's why admins are so protective of their cabal and won't let anyone else ever join them...they simply have too strong a tool/weapon. --ShabiDOO 13:13, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

Ta

A nom! I'm strangely inspired and may even write something new -it's been months. --Sog1970 21:06, October 9, 2011 (UTC)

That's great to hear, man! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:50, 10 October 2011

Hey?

Why are you vandalizing Template:insulting words?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 10:52, October 10, 2011 (UTC)

Why are you? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:54, 10 October 2011

I did not.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 10:56, October 10, 2011 (UTC)

I just added some new insulting words, silly billy.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 10:56, October 10, 2011 (UTC)

So you consider furry an insulting word? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:02, 10 October 2011

No, but ill use "furfag" instead.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 11:05, October 10, 2011 (UTC)

Categorising redirects

As a general rule, please don't do that; all it does is clutter up the categories even further and generally serves no purpose. 1234 ~ 22:20, 10 October 2011

As a general rule, sure. As an absolute law, not so much, though. Additionally, if it's funny, it serves this site's purpose. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:26, 10 October 2011

Great, I'm glad we agree. As such, I take we also shouldn't have any trouble agreeing that it shouldn't be done unless there's something particularly special about the redirect in question (although even then there'd probably be a better way about it), since it messes with maintenance, yes? I mean, we've found ways around having double redirects, and don't do that as a general rule, either - and by 'general', I do mean 'actual', even if it isn't written in stone anywhere. We generally don't write things in stone around here, after all. Or rather, we actually don't. Stone is expensive. 1234 ~ 22:34, 10 October 2011

Yup. And I'm not planning on creating any double redirects. Though I personally wouldn't mind if Redirect page was a double redirect (i.e. an actual redirect to itself). —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:49, 10 October 2011

Thanks Socky!

And he entered the temple upon his horseless chariot and drove out those who sold, 46 popping a wheelie unto them and saying, "It is written, 'My house shall be a place where we can ride without getting hassled by the man,' but you have made it a den of robbers." Luke 19:45-46

Tanks for he nom and vote on Ghostwriter! --    15:19, October 11, 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:57, 11 October 2011

Since we're talking about it

I made this welcome page awhile back. I used it a couple of times in the past, and I want to start using my own again. But was I'm wondering if it's good or need some improvement.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 21:58, October 11, 2011 (UTC)

It looks pretty good. You might want to add an image to it, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:00, 11 October 2011

Will do---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 22:06, October 11, 2011 (UTC)

An image like Socky has on his user page. Aleister 16:00 14-10-'11

Just sayin'

Just sayin', like, I've got 49 features, like, and one of my pages has had 12 votes for just ages and ages, and, like, just sayin', if you want to nudge it to Freedom Square, wink-wink, like, yeah, I wouldn't be too mad or nuttin', just sayin'. Oh, and in other matters, please feel free to add to an UnNews I just put up, Occupy Uncyclopedia. I'll ask MattSnow and others if they want to enlarge it too. My page is maybe a good start, but I only have a couple more hours on now and won't funny it up as much as it could be. Just sayin'. Aleister 16:03 14-10-'11

I'll see what I can do. And please stop saying "just sayin'" and "like" so much, it's making my head spin. >.< —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:46, 14 October 2011

Like, huh? Confusious say "A man with spinning head pleases ladies very much". Just sayin' 17:49 14-10-'11

I sure hope Confucius was right. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:01, 14 October 2011

Confusin' Aleister 18:03 14-10-'11

p.s. Just saw the fasssstttt nom and featuring of "This is not Sparta". That's what I mean when I say we all need you to write write and write some more, while at the same time battling off the lesser admins while writing with the other hand. Just s...'

Ah, if only my life would allow it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:18, 14 October 2011

I come to you for everything...

...and will keep on doing so. Could you resurface Proto-badger, one of the huffed pages during the purge? It is the only red link on the list of Vote for Good pages, and thus seems to have earned its mettle. This is a good thing. Aleister 18:46 14-10-'11

Done. Vnefnb is also a red link there, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:58, 14 October 2011

How's this?

 ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Oct 14 '11 23:43 (UTC)

That looks awesome! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:21, 15 October 2011

it's alive!

Weee. Now I'm satisfied that the Indiana Jones and blah article has more university level archaeology than just random Indiana Jones cruft. Sad I didn't have more days before PLS to knock up more stuff because it was shat on for being too much like an unscript. I tried to follow the style of a wiki film page this time around. Indiana Jones and the Typical University-level Dig, you are the only other true editor really. --Nikau 01:13, October 15, 2011 (UTC)

It looks even better now. All it needs now is a picture of the film to put into that template at the top. Complaining about an article being like an UnSript sounds like a rather lame excuse to not like the article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:29, 15 October 2011

Mr. Fail Needs Some Help

Hello random person who's talk page was the first one I randomly found! I am failing at the moment, and I need your help. How do you make an awesome signature? Your's is awesome and I wanted to have one like it.--TehGrammerNazi 15:47, October 16, 2011 (UTC) (See how fail that looks?)

You can go here and steal some of my code. You'll also have to follow some of these instructions. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:00, 16 October 2011

It has worrrrrked! Thank u from teh guy wiff teh good grammerzezz! --iHazTehGoodGrammerz -- TalkyPage 16:17, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Lyrithya told me to go poke an another admin.

And tell them that she wants to make me a poopsmith, but doesn't want to do it herself. She said to go tell another admin to do it for her. Everything is here. -- 16:29, October 16, 2011 (UTC)

Well, if you really want the job and no one's against it, no problem. Enjoy your poopsmithery. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:04, 16 October 2011

Edits and spelling

Thanks a million Socky for doing the editing of stupid cats. You are a special star in the sky of life and love and stuff. --ShabiDOO 15:56, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, no problem, Shabidoo. Thanks for your praise. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:00, 21 October 2011

And thanks for the door handle spellchecking! I was kinda shocked to realise how many there were. :S I think me and Shabidoo are not the greatest spellers! :) Mattsnow 16:19, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess you could say that. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:20, 21 October 2011

And don't forget that the two of us are very grateful for correcting the spelling. Hugs. --ShabiDOO 16:26, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

It certainly is because our maternal language isn't English. What your maternal language, Shab? Mattsnow 16:29, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

It's more complicated than you would be interested in listening to. The simple story is my father is british/icelandic/spanish and I spoke english (amongst others) during a lot of my childhood but its been 10 years that I dont live in an english speaking country and my coloquial English has imrproved BIG TIME since I joined uncyclopedia.

Also, socky, did you know that I'm thankful for the spelling corrections? Because I am! --ShabiDOO 16:43, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Me too! Very thankful! And yeah, me too, my English has improved tremendously since joining Uncy. Mattsnow 17:03, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I know. And I'm very grateful that you're thankful. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:05, 21 October 2011

So ultimately socky, what we are trying to do is say...hey man...that was cool of you...thanks buddy. If that makes sense. --ShabiDOO 17:49, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, that makes sense. And you're welcome. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:09, 21 October 2011

Thanks. --ShabiDOO 18:19, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Wheel war?

Mon, could you please stop revert me without even trying to talk to me first, and maybe explain why you would want to or some such? In many cases, I might even agree if I saw whatever it was you were basing the matter on, and in other cases, well, perhaps I also had a reason for doing whatever I did that you might not realise. Meantime I moved this particular one into the userspace of the fellow who apparently changed it the most, however; is that a reasonable compromise for the people who apparently like it? 1234 ~ 16:33, 21 October 2011

Sorry, I probably shouldn't have reverted you as outrightly as I did. So I assume you hadn't seen the article before? Because it was nommed on VFH for a while, where it garnered quite some support. The people who like it would probably want it in mainspace, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:43, 21 October 2011

This is an awsome article that belongs in main space. --ShabiDOO 16:44, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

I think some people who voted for were joking though... Mattsnow 17:04, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

I has goofy candy. Aleister 18:06 21-10-'11

Well, if any of you guys wants it back in mainspace, feel free to nom the page here. It's not an official voting page yet, though, so I can't guarantee anything. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:59, 21 October 2011

Well, mentioning that might have helped, but that would also be why you should talk to me first about such things - in this case, what Mattsnow said stands, and it is also standard practice to delete such joke noms after they fail these days, since they would have been deleted in the first place anyway, otherwise. 1234 ~ 19:02, 21 October 2011

Right, again, sorry for reverting you straight away. I'll make sure I talk to you about it first in the future. As for it arguably being a joke nom, while I can imagine a large portion of the for voters voting for as a joke, there's still a big difference between not wanting something on the front page and thinking it shouldn't be allowed in mainspace. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:09, 21 October 2011

Thank you. But mon, if everything someone wanted in mainspace were safe from deleting, we wouldn't be able to delete anything. We do have a crappy document and a horde of roving wombats to draw some lines for a reason, though. 1234 ~ 20:56, 21 October 2011

Well, sure. But if it'd been nommed on VFD and seven people had voted to keep it, I doubt there would've been enough other people that check VFD to vote to delete it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:13, 21 October 2011

Thanks

I should just bookmark the word "Thanks" and zap it right in here whenever I come by. Thanks for the nice forum and kind words, you kind of make me want to live up to them someday. You are a Prince among Paupers and Peepers. And thanks for digging out that Proto-badger page. It isn't mine, so I threw it up on site again, and now VFG is whole again. And thanks for the spelling fixes at a few of my articles a few days ago, featured with misspellings (and why not, it is 2011 and with the state of our education system nobody would have ever noticed, except you, a fucking genius). Thanks for all those things, and more than that, for the pet leopard. Aleister 18:11 21-10-'11

You're welcome, Aleister. But remember to feed it regularly. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:15, 21 October 2011

thanks

Thanks for the nomination and vote for me in the Playwright of the Month award (it was about 3 weeks ago; I should drop in here more often...). I was really surprised when I looked at my user page and saw the template. Thanks! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 18:38, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

'Twas my pleasure, Ptok. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:45, 21 October 2011

thanks

thanks again socky --ShabiDOO 00:20, October 22, 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome, Shabidoo. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:45, 22 October 2011

Allah/God/Yahweh (pick one) thanks you for your VFH vote

...on that UnNews piece I did.

However, I'm getting the distinct impression that folks don't like the articles in my Les Pénis Grotesques series. Maybe I should lay off that theme for a while. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 22 '11 9:45 (UTC)

Indeed, though some of them seem to want more repulsive fictional things to stick your dick in. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:51, 22 October 2011

Hmm...I spent about 15 minutes on that article, and pretty much stole the ending piece-meal from HowTo:Slice your appendages off with a rail gun, so I can see how folks might be left wanting more. When it has failed completely, maybe you and me might try giving it a better ending?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 22 '11 10:21 (UTC)

Sure, but what kind of ending would it be then? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:27, 22 October 2011

Definitely not a happy one. hur hur.

Not really sure, which is why I'm open to suggestions. Originally, I was going to photoshop an image of the beast itself, and do the reveal at the end, but I decided against that because I thought actually seeing the whole monster would ruin the joke. (It's really better in your head, I think.) But for one thing, maybe I could turn the images into wood-cuts, to be more consistent with the theme and the title?

Of course, no matter what we do, stories that are dick-related activate Lyrithya's hatred of the phallo-centric Western patriarchy that has oppressed her peoples for centuries, so she'll just vote "no" reflexively.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 22 '11 10:59 (UTC)

Yeah, the wood-cut idea might work. Since when did Western patriarchy disapprove of lesbians, though? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:09, 22 October 2011

They...they don't. They just oppress them. You know, by making them "do it"...while the patriarchy watches.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 22 '11 11:15 (UTC)

Ah, of course. It's the voyeurism she dislikes. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:17, 22 October 2011

Also, it prevents them from marrying, and subjects them to stereotyping and discrimination...or something. I'm a li'l fuzzy on the details.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 22 '11 11:19 (UTC)

The marriage dealy has always confused me. It's not like they're not allowed to have some big fancy party with a fake priest (real priests have this phobia for gay people or something). —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:23, 22 October 2011

Well, if you aren't legally married, you can't legally inherit your partner's swag if he/she dies (barring a will, of course); you don't have power of attorney to make decisions for them if they're in the hospital, dead, or mentally incapacitated (once again, in the absence of a will)...and so on, and so forth. It's mostly the legal stuff, I think, and as for "civil unions"...well, "separate but equal" is a crock, if you believe the U.S. Supreme Court.

So, y'know. Oppression. Boo, patriarchies! Boooo.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 22 '11 11:31 (UTC)

I wonder what it'd be like in a matriarchy. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:35, 22 October 2011

asked and answered, Sir.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 22 '11 11:44 (UTC)

Well, luckily patriarchies are more reserved than matriarchies. Or everybody'd be walking with their penis out of their pants. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:47, 22 October 2011

or with no pants at all. Ach, Mein Gott!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 22 '11 12:00 (UTC)

And to think he's supposed to be one of the superheroes! Have they no shame? Think of the children for God's sake! The children!! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:03, 22 October 2011

On a completely unrelated note, there's a Halloween Wiki. ZOMG, my pants are tight. ~this user loves Halloween so much he wants to marry it12:23, October 22, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, Halloween. Another thing we don't have in Belgium. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:28, 22 October 2011

thanks again

thanks again again again socky--ShabiDOO 17:40, October 22, 2011 (UTC)

You're still welcome. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:54, 22 October 2011

You thought you were sneaky

I saw what you did here. Gonna get you back, and you won't see it coming. *evil laugh*---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 01:11, October 23, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, I can't wait to see what you come up with. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:15, 23 October 2011

You'll be amazed. I guarantee it or your money back.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 01:50, October 23, 2011 (UTC)

Google chrome and uncyc

I am trying to create an article about Warehouse 13. Each time I paste the wikicode from zombocom (as a basis) and press enter, it creates a ton of space (as in, about a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a this much (except imagine all those a's being stacked). Is this google chrome + uncyc issue or did I just find a bug? – Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkArcher25 (talk • contribs)

Sign your post dude.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 03:05, October 23, 2011 (UTC)

Holy Crap! Thanks for pointing that out. (Please Don't Kill Me!) Anyway, I just worked on a lab report for 2-3 hours and i'm a bit zonked :( – Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkArcher25 (talk • contribs)

Well, it probably has something to do with what you were trying to copypaste. As far as I'm aware, though, the only thing on Zombo.com is a Flash animation. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:07, 23 October 2011

Socky: It works in FF as normal. I think we have a Uncyc + GC bug (or we can add this to the page on Google (something about "Google Chrome Hates Uncyc" :))) – Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkArcher25 (talk • contribs)

Yeah, I heard some things don't work right in certain browsers. Maybe it's one of those bugs. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:18, 23 October 2011

Greetings, Sir Sock

(first version)

Is this better than the one that exists already? Or should I just go back to writing articles?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 23 '11 10:01 (UTC)

Maybe. The nose looks a little bit off, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:03, 23 October 2011

Ok, I tweaked Oscar Wilde's nose. Better? Also, duuuude looks like a lady...  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 23 '11 12:28 (UTC)

And here's a completely-different looking one, which looks more like the original prize, and less like...well, an Oscar® ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 23 '11 12:52 (UTC)

A lot depends on how it looks when it's made smaller, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:49, 23 October 2011

original	my 4rd version
old version, scaled	my 4rd version, scaled

Of course, this is pretty far down on the "list of things that folks should give a rat's ass about." I just had a few spare minutes, and whipped it up. Also, I should probably be watching football right now. Or something.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 23 '11 15:44 (UTC)

Well, your version is better quality-wise, but it's a bit too dark in certain spots and it's missing that blurry thingy at the bottom of a Pulitzer Prize. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:14, 23 October 2011

Turns out that blurry thing is a bunch of words. >.< Also, this football game is terrible.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 23 '11 19:05 (UTC)

Yup, that looks a lot better. The INSERT NAME HERE bit might be better if it wasn't in black, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:50, 23 October 2011

In the full size version, it's not black, it's engraved, like the real Pulitzer. Just doesn't scale well from the 444-pixel full size. I think I fixed it now, but I can't tell.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Oct 24 '11 8:48 (UTC)

I'd say it's better than the current one in every aspect now. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:55, 24 October 2011

• For Just saw this. It looks good. Let's make Bizzee's the new award image. -- The Zombiebaron 19:00, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

  Already done. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:11, 24 October 2011

Rule 34

Um...that video we talked about? I bet...it's going to be one of these, isn't it. >.<  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Oct 24 '11 18:17 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess so. I don't want it to be a porn vid, though. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:29, 24 October 2011

I'm sure there's something there that's veeeeery tasteful. However, my Internet is very very very slow (almost non-existent), so I'll have to let you do the research. :D  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Oct 24 '11 18:37 (UTC)

Every time I pretend to come here I have to drop by your page and say "Hi Socky!!" in some form or other. And you, the other guy, Bizzeebeever, I've seen you doing more and more here but we haven't crossed paths as yet, but I do have a shotgun and am looking forward to that encounter. Socky, youse the bestest of all the geepers here. Aleister 18:39 24-10-'11

Thank you, Aleister. If only I didn't need to go through all this porn. It may surprise you, but porn tends to feature these sausage-like thingies which I find very distasteful to look at. O_o —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:52, 24 October 2011

Did I mention I also dislike objects shaped like those thingies I mentioned earlier? Anyway, this appears to have some usable material. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:13, 24 October 2011

What has Uncyclopedia gone to? Socky and Bizzeebeever are making pornos, and Aleister is kidnapping Cinderella? This is madness! -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 25 October 2011, at 22:17

Of course it's madness. Uncyclopedia is grounded upon sheer madness. MADNESS I SAY! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:21, 25 October 2011

Madness?

-- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 25 October 2011, at 22:29

Exactly. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:40, 25 October 2011

Congrratulations!

I thought you deserved one of these too.

The Golden
AwaRRd

Keep up the good worrk! --Black Flamingo 22:59, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

Woo!! Go me! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:42, 24 October 2011

Never

Never. --ShabiDOO 21:15, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Okay. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:33, 25 October 2011

The student becomes the teacher. --ShabiDOO 22:09, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Indeed. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:11, 25 October 2011

Shabidoo is getting weirder and weirder

Could you do me a big favor? If you could proofread HowTo:Snowboard your way to awesomeness!, that would be... well, awesome! Mattsnow 07:39, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Done! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:54, 26 October 2011

Thank you man! Much appreciated. Mattsnow 08:00, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, my pleasure. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:04, 26 October 2011

Yes...thanks socky! --ShabiDOO 16:51, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

vascodegama

Hey socky ireally thought you article was good...and i find the critique far more confusing than the article. Im Sure it will be featured. --ShabiDOO 16:51, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, man. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:53, 27 October 2011

Thanks for your thanks. --ShabiDOO 17:21, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for thanking me for my thanks. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:22, 27 October 2011

this section is good for 3 things

I thought the Vasco article was funny in a wtf kind of way, who knew he was a completely unfunny 14th century troll. Anyway, is it possible to redirect Plumber to Tradesmen.

Also, I'm gunning for a nom for RoboCop. Basically, think of yourself as well, RoboCop. Then the article makes sense. It should work without seeing the film, I have essentially described the whole plot. --Nikau 01:35, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

I created the redirect and I just nommed your article. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:30, 28 October 2011

I hate to say it, but Frosty did have a good point voting against. I'm just wondering whether it would work better formatted like suddenly, Raccons? --Nikau 11:14, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

That might work, but the way you did it, the text at the bottom is WAY too big. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:19, 28 October 2011

Oh shite. I'm working off an Android phone, so I have no idea what any formatting looks like on a computer. My comp don't like Uncyclopedia, the servers never load.--Nikau 14:59, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

Well, try using two or three <big>s instead of seven or eight. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:17, 28 October 2011

Oh well. Is it possible to close down the nomination? If it is going to be this format it may need more work. I'll try and give it to mattsnow for a pee when I am done. --Nikau 00:33, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

Alright. I withdrew the nom. Let me know when you're done with it, I'd gladly nom it again. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:52, 29 October 2011

Thanks. You're about the most patient person on the site. --Nikau 02:13, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Thanks, man. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:18, 29 October 2011

Tune In, Turn On and Drop (LSD) Out

Wake & Bake withDr StrangeThursdays, 6 -10amKFJC 89.7fm

I used to take that Timothy Leary album and mix the crap out of it. I was "challenging" lol. Thanks for the vote, Socky!--    13:45, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

Always a pleasure, DrStrange. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:56, 28 October 2011

SpongeBob SquarePants

You voted for SpongeBob SquarePants on VFH, which was featured!

As a reward, please accept this lovely template, complete with ice cream and a rectangular prism.

---

Thanks for the vote! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:55, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

A five-hundred-word post that comes with footnotes...and a burning question.

Howdy, Sock. After you asked me to animate that gif, I was suddenly imbued with the passion to learn all about the fancy-pants world of video animation. So I went and downloaded all the 3D modeling, rendering and animation software and video editors/non-linear compositors I could get my hands on. I've got Blender, Kerkythea, POV-Ray, Wings3D, Anim8or, Terranim8or, Debugmode's Wax, t@b's ZS4, Avidemux, InstantAVITricks, VirtualDub, Jahshaka, and three dozen others whose names I've forgotten already. (On my old Mac, I've also got Flash MX.)

Anyway, I suddenly realized this might be a tiny bit of overkill. Just the slightest. So I looked around on the web, and whaddya know, there's this set of GIMP plugins called the GIMP Animation Package (GAP) which seems perfect for my purposes.

Long story short: now that I've got GAP all set up and am familiar with it, I'd like to try out a simple animation, like, say, your request for a bouncy Wikipedia logo parody, before I get to the Big Rip animation. Unfortunately, I'm not sure which two ugly logos you're talking about. Did you mean this and this?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 30 '11 6:23 (UTC)

Yup, those are the two I was talking about. And if you're gonna make a bouncy version you can drop the "The Free Encyclopedia" part. Our current bouncy Wikipedia logo doesn't have it either. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:32, 30 October 2011

original	current	my "hybrid"	"hybrid", no letters	bouncy bouncy!
Is this what you had in mind?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Oct 31 '11 3:46 (UTC)

Yup. It's almost perfect, but combining the lighter shade from the new one with the darker shade from the old one has created an interesting effect. I'd like to keep that effect, but it should be somewhat less pronounced. You know what I mean, right? To the right of the image, as the logo gets darker, the lines of the puzzle appear lighter. If you could make those lines slightly darker and make them less voluminous in the right bottom corner where they stand out the most, that'd be terrific. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:58, 31 October 2011

Better?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Oct 31 '11 17:23 (UTC)

Yup. Except now there's this bit of a puzzle piece's edge at the bottom center that's gotten a bit darker and is now more pronouncedly shaped like a tiny dick. If you could copypaste that part from the previous version that'd be terrific. Oh, and there's also a dark line at the top that's a bit too voluminous. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:37, 31 October 2011

I hope I got it right this time. P.S. You guys need to get "real" Halloween over there. Over here, it isn't just some excuse to get drunk, or for stores to sell candy to adults, who then use it to lure children. Ok, technically it is, but the real spirit of Halloween (ha, pun) is about autumn, and the harvest, and telling ghost stories around the fire while the storm rages outside. It's all very Gothic and/or pagan. Also, I thought it started over some'eres Europe a-ways. How'd you folks forget all your old Druidic traditions and leave it up us stoopit Americans to revive them? For shame.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 1 '11 22:29 (UTC)

Yup, that's perfect.
Actually, it was based on a Celtic feast called Samhain combined with a couple Roman and Christian traditions. But around the time people were migrating to America (That's right, you're filthy immigrants! :P) only the Irish were still celebrating it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:43, 1 November 2011

I know all about that stuff. Don't you remember? I want to marry Halloween! Unfortunately, she won't have me.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 1 '11 23:19 (UTC)

Yeah, good luck with that. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:40, 1 November 2011

---

Guess what

Could you proofread that small UnNews for me? I just got that out of my hat. User:Mattsnow/UnNews:FOXNews uncovers Ron Paul's demonic past! I know, the title is not right at all, I'll change it when I move it to userspace! You would be awesome and don't forget bro, I like to do Pee Review and I do quite elaborated ones, if you ever want me to take a crack at one of your articles, feel free to ask! Mattsnow 20:09, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

I'll take a look. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:20, 31 October 2011

A look was taken and small changes were made. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:32, 31 October 2011

Thank you! I always learn a little more. Mattsnow 00:38, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks socky. --ShabiDOO 01:20, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

You're both welcome. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:21, 31 October 2011

Just curious

I just moved a page and my life was threatened by a masked gun man who said that if I made any double redirects he'd eat my brain, presumably after he blew it out of my head. So... Err... My question is, what's a double redirect and how are they avoided? I understand and I wish to continue. . 00:01, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

A double redirect is a peculiar phenomenon that occurs when one redirect redirects to another redirect. It can be averted by changing the first redirect to point to the object of redirection of the latter redirect, thus annihilating the doubleness of the redirect. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:42, 1 November 2011

You have to kill the redirect with fire. Or a pike and garlic. Or a beheading. Or preferably, QVFD it! :) Mattsnow 00:47, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!

-- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 1 November 2011, at 01:14

Interesting. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:52, 1 November 2011

Hard to believe the Belgians don't celebrate the holiday. Oh well, at least you guys still have tasty chocolates. *pops a Belgian chocolate into mouth* -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 1 November 2011, at 01:55

Well, some Belgians celebrate it to some extent, but it's more in a hey-it's-popular-in-America-so-it-must-be-inherently-cool kind of way. The shops encourage this wannabe-Americanism because they get money out of it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:02, 1 November 2011

Socky...zijt ge vlaamse? --ShabiDOO 02:10, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Yup. Well, just Vlaams actually. "Vlaamse" is the feminine form. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:12, 1 November 2011

All this time I thought you were joking about Belgium. hahahahahaha. Ik heb en Leuven voor drie jaaren gewont...en ik ga naar Leuven, elke zommer en elke kerst dag! Ik heb en Leuven en september en ik zaal nar Leuven deze kertmas gaan! Sorry dat ik slechte nederlands spreken! --ShabiDOO 02:52, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, no problem. Just so you know, in is still in in Dutch. I think en is French. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:58, 1 November 2011

Thanks. To be honest...I think you are the first person to correct me...in the last five years. It is the greatest challenge in the world to get someone to take you seriously when you practice your dutch in public!!! Hahaha. So...thanks socky! --ShabiDOO 03:01, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:03, 1 November 2011

Fluent in both Belgian and English...fantastic. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 1 November 2011, at 03:10

Sadly, Belgian isn't an actual language. There's just Flemish and Walloon, which are Belgian flavours of Dutch and French. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:12, 1 November 2011

Incidentally, I had checked to see what language they speak in Belgium. The official languages are Dutch, French, and German. I've also read that Flemish is a combination between French and Dutch. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 1 November 2011, at 03:14

Not a combination, really. It just took a couple words from French and made them more Dutchlike, in a rather similar fashion to the way a lot of English words are based on French ones. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:19, 1 November 2011

I think Belgium is more concerned right now with getting an official government than working out the official languages. How long is it now? One and a half years without a government? Belgium will turn into a functionariocracy soon...no? --ShabiDOO 03:26, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

I know that we've been at it for more than a year and less than two years. Which is weird, because Belgium is pretty much a totalitarian state already. And instead of actually (ab)using the power they have, the politicians decide to squabble over unimportant bullshit. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:53, 1 November 2011

Happy Halloween bastards! And Socky, do you know French a bit? Also, your country is almost the cycling capital of the world (cycling is my passion), do you ride yourself? Mattsnow 03:40, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, didn't you ask me those questions on IRC once... Well, I know some French and I cycle occasionally. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:46, 1 November 2011

Imma going to open a can of worms and ask what part of Belgium you come from. I'm a useless Kiwistralian btw. --Nikau 06:27, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

I'm from Flanders. But I assure you it sounds a lot less like a Simpsons character in Flemish. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:46, 1 November 2011

The french/dutch debate creates tension and problems...but its nothing like the french/english debate in Canada which can cause all out economic problems and dont forget the terrorim in the 70s. The walloons are known for their love of life, waffles and cyclists, the flemish are known for their incredible caution, safe streets, endive cassarol and cities that are not falling apart. --ShabiDOO 17:14, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Not having a government can have a negative effect on the economy, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:44, 1 November 2011

Thanks again Socky

Thanks for the edits...again. --ShabiDOO 17:14, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:43, 1 November 2011

...

As I archived all the monthly awards yesterday, can you unprotect and reset VFS please <3 -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 21:41, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Sure thing, dude. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:55, 1 November 2011

Could you

Please send a proper welcoming message to this guy: User:AbusedJimmy He edited his talk page a couple of minutes after joining, stating he needed help, and I thaught it would show as a message already sent on the new user log, so I sent him one with {{Welcome}} but that really sucked. Could you teach me how to send a welcome message so that the formatting is OK? Mattsnow 03:22, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

I fixed it. In the future, use a subst next time: - as in, {{subst:welcome}} and it'll work. Cheers. 1234 ~ 03:41, 3 November 2011

Thamks. I will try that on an unsuspecting new user. BETTER WORK THOUGH!! Mattsnow 03:44, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

It's fun when it doesn't work. 1234 ~ 03:57, 3 November 2011

Yup, subst: is the answer to all of your problems. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:12, 3 November 2011

Then why am I still bald? 1234 ~ 02:36, 4 November 2011

Because transcluding hair doesn't do the trick. You have to subst: it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:23, 4 November 2011

That's what I tried. It got all weird, mummy. O_o 1234 ~ 14:18, 4 November 2011

You didn't subst: your cat onto your head, did you? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:26, 4 November 2011

No... it's just... it was so weird. Like these looping ponytails, or something... 1234 ~ 15:07, 4 November 2011

Oh, that sounds adorable. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:10, 4 November 2011

Pass the gravy boat and the green piped potatoes, would you , Love?

Thank you for your vote on Fanny Cradock! Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:26, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your vote on the Foolizter Prize

You now have a burning urge to send Bizzeebeever all of your money, a tasteful 8"x10" glossy nude print of yourself, and the keys to your apartment.
 ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Nov 4 '11 23:22 (UTC)

Haha, you misspelled Foolitzer. Now your brainwashing won't have any effect anymore. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:38, 5 November 2011

You only think it's misspelled. this unsigned comment was added by no one at all. No one. Carry on. Nothing to see here.

FANKS

AG FANKS MAN! You was prove you are not a sout piel and now you can like to get dis template because you did pay attentions... Now go milk dat bliksimse cow!

Thankss

Thank you for voting You have recieved a single pass to the Jones Family Memorial Museum to see all the artifacts retrieved without incident by the various Joneses. The museum remains the most popular location in the continental United States to be crushed by a boulder, despite that wanky 127 Hours film. --Nikau 02:32, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

Huffed article

I was wondering if I could get this un-huffed and moved to my userspace at User:Bizzeebeever/Articles/Vampire watermelon. I've got a eye-dear.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Nov 9 '11 6:49 (UTC)

Aaaand done. You're welcome! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:00, 9 November 2011

Many thanks unto you, Sire.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Nov 9 '11 11:26 (UTC)

Vasco da Gama

Eu não falo Inglês, estúpido. Vasco da Gama 11:38, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

Lindsay Lohan

I have moved your article here, as it has already been deleted twice and if you want to work on it, that would be the place to do so. That said, was that you that undeleted it the second time? The log appears to be missing.

Anyway, assuming that was, I should probably point out that if you were anyone else you'd probably have gotten banned for recreating deleted content in mainspace again, and considering that, could you please not do that in the future at very least to set a good example to the noobs and whatnot? Please? Just keep these things in userspace until you're done, that's all. 1234 ~ 13:42, 10 November 2011

You know I can't work on stuff in my userspace. It just whithers there and dies. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:52, 10 November 2011

Alternative Contact Methods

Socky - I have a question, but I strongly prefer uncyc email over a talk page post.

Magnus: You're brilliant. Now get out-You can't catch me, because I'm TURBO PENGUIN! 06:13, November 13, 2011 (UTC)

Well, I don't use an email around here. But if you prefer email, maybe you can consult another admin, one that uses email, for your question. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:26, 13 November 2011

Howdy

Wanted to let you know that, contrary to appearances, I have not forgotten about that Big Rip thingy. I am suddenly busy; I hope to get it done very soon.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 13 '11 14:06 (UTC)

That's nice to know. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:09, 13 November 2011

HowTo:Earn Yourself A Template!

Thanks For Your Purchase! The NAARAHYNWOMDTCRDP appreciates your patronage because it prevents us from having to get real jobs and we can continue to provide you with compelling yet useless publications which exploit your fear of embarrassment and nuclear holocausts. Here's an oddly designed abomination of a template for your talk page as a special gift which acknowledges your stupidity for everyone on Uncyclopedia to see!

Thanks for the vote Socky! --    18:04, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

No problem, DrStrange. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:08, 14 November 2011

Those hot football titties and asses. Your edit looks fine to me. Damn that woman is vindictive (about double my level). I'm expecting Lyrithya's against vote in 3-2-1.....That's fine. I expected 2-3 against, at the least, and just hope for enough interest to overcome that. My record with UnNews is just shit. I just can't get stuff featured in that idiom. I seem to be 100% perfect with HowTo for some reason though. I looked over the news article (again) twice this morning and I have absolutely no clue as to what grammatical or prose errors need to be corrected. I think I do well for myself, considering that I'm a high school dropout, but I have a few more rules to learn and memorize.--    16:16, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, Lyrithya just added a comment pointing out that VFH is not a discussion page, which is probably good advice. The only way to prevent/defuse drama is to avoid large blocks of serious text. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:27, 15 November 2011

Agreed. And I just responded to Lyrithiya on her talk page. A comment like "Why should an article that the author admits was quickly half-assed and not worth polishing up be featured?" is not only a personal attack on the author but is also disinformation. I know, two wrongs don't make a right.--    16:40, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

I think I bit someone

But I forgot who it was, if I even did. Was it you, or do you know whom it may have been? I fear for contagions. I wanna be the only vampire around, so I can be special and brood and have bad television episodes written about me! 1234 ~ 17:35, 15 November 2011

You may have bitten me once, a long time ago. I'm not sure if you were already a vampire at that time, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:02, 15 November 2011

Similar creatures across different Japanese TV series centered around battles where powerful creatures are summoned using some small object that usually has a real-life equivalent of these battles in the form of a game, except in real life, you don't actually get to summon any creatures

You seem to be doing it again, creating an article which does things to the English language and eyesight that should never be done. Cool. Aleister 19:40 14-11-'11

That's awesome, man! I had no idea! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:45, 16 November 2011

Hello!

Quick question: the Big Rip animation should be 320px across, right?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Nov 18 '11 10:35 (UTC)

More something like 250px. Though if three hundred something px is more convenient for you, that'll be all right too. Feel free to make a big and a small version, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:38, 18 November 2011

I'll try to make it tonight; I've been caught up in the voices in my own head, and also saving one or two or five articles whose heads Zombiebaron put on La Guillotine's chopping block. ZB and Lyrithya laughed at me when I told them I was going to do the first part of that animation in Blender, and when those two numb-nuts laugh at you for over-thinking it, you know you're over-thinking it.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 20 '11 16:39 (UTC)

Probably. Not that I'd know anything about making animations. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:03, 20 November 2011

Redirectses

Would it be possible to redirect Australian constitution, Australian election, Australian electoral law, and Australian politics to Australian electoral system please? I can't see any good articles coming from any. --Nikau 04:01, November 19, 2011 (UTC)

I'd gladly redirect the latter three there, but I'd think the Australian constitution, aside from its failure to mention a Prime Minister, might be notable for some of the things it actually does say. Or if we had an article on Australian law (surely there must be some ridiculous laws out there to make fun of) it might be redirected there. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:51, 19 November 2011

The Herman Cain article

Waddya think about it? Should we go ahead with this or wait to get some more inspiration? Feel free to add stuff BTW! :) Mattsnow 06:05, November 21, 2011 (UTC)

If you're asking if it's ready to be moved into mainspace, I'd say it looks sufficiently finished to do that. Should I do the honors? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:19, 21 November 2011

Well, yeah, go ahead! Mattsnow 19:56, November 21, 2011 (UTC)

Okay. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:47, 21 November 2011

What could we add? I'd like to make it VFH worthy, but nobody's adding anything... I think that everything in there is kinda good. Mattsnow 20:49, November 21, 2011 (UTC)

Well, the last couple sections look a bit short. I'm afraid my inspiration is all used up at the moment, though. : / —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:53, 21 November 2011

big rip intro

Will this work for the intro? Now that I know what I'm doing with GAP, it shouldn't take me too much time to do the second part.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 21 '11 15:12 (UTC)

Wow, that looks awesome. Yes, that will certainly work. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:56, 21 November 2011

Pssst! Yoo-hoo! Anybody home...? I've got something for you...

Heeeeere Sock Sock Sock Sock Sock...

Damnit, why do socks always disappear when you're lookin' for 'em? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 22 '11 14:18 (UTC)

It's the nature of the beast, or item of clothing if you will. It's not exactly the way I imagined it, but it's possibly better. But could you try uploading another version with a little bit more ripping before she makes the big hole in her pantyhose? I'd like to see the effect of the ladders in the nylon. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:41, 22 November 2011

Well, that's all the tearing she does on that leg. I would've done the other leg, but she takes a good 20 seconds or so on that one, and the tearing is harder for the matte to track, so I'd have to do the transition by hand. Can you give me the start and end points in that video that you'd like to have? Like you did with the anime videos. I'm bad at visualizing stuff.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 22 '11 18:33 (UTC)

1:20 till 1:43 seems about right. Feel free to speed it up and leave out a couple intermediate frames, however. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:00, 22 November 2011

And the black layer should disappear somewhere around the middle of that, possibly slightly later than the middle. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:20, 22 November 2011

Ok. I'll have to scale it down, too, or the file size will end up being huge. It's too bad we can't use Flash video here, because an H264-encoded video of the same size and length is about 1/10th the file size.

Also, how long do you want the fade-out of the black layer to be? I only went with 10 frames, because I'm lazy.

(And how the **** do people's talk pages keep disappearing from my watchlist?)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Nov 23 '11 7:40 (UTC)

Yeah, 10 frames should be about right. Another thing that might be worth considering (if you think it'll reduce the file size) is instead of doing the black layer fade-out, having the black fade into the color of the pantyhose and then showing the pantyhose ripping from really close-by (i.e. all you can see is a piece of the woman's leg covered up by the pantyhose) and then zooming out and revealing the whole picture, after which we see a little more of the ripping and then it ends. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:38, 23 November 2011

Socky, could I ask you a couple more questions on IRC?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Nov 23 '11 9:53 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:26, 23 November 2011

Still workin' on it, might get it finished in a day or a dozen. I'm currently trying to get a graphic design project finished for some guy who's been breathing down the back of my neck about it for parts of the last 18 months. :)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 15:27 (UTC)

Hopefully sooner than a dozen. ; ) What's the graphic design project about, if you don't mind me asking? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:38, 28 November 2011

It's a music player that he needs a fancy schmancy GUI for, and I volunteered to design it a year and a half ago. Then I made some mockups, which he liked, but he wanted some "small" changes here and there. <insert_long_boring_story_here/>...so, eighteen months later, he's living downstairs and he's got a haircut just like mine (bowl-cut with a mullet in the back) and he's wearing the exact kind of clothes I wear, and...I think he may be fucking my girlfriend, too. He says he's not stalking me, though, which I believe, for some reason.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 17:49 (UTC)

Socky: are you online? I've almost got the second version done. Would it be okay if I uploaded a video version for your approval, instead of the .GIF? An MP4 would be about 1/10th the file size, so it wouldn't take me as long to upload. And then if it looks ok, I'll upload the final .GIF  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 13:18 (UTC)

Well, I went ahead and made an .mp4, it should (should) open with MPlayer or VLC, or MPC-HC (windows). Let me know!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 1 '11 17:11 (UTC)

Hmm, could you change how fast it changes from one frame to the next? About twice as slow (i.e. half as fast) should be about right. Also, at one point the girl's just moving her leg and the bottom part of what we can see of her leg moves away from the camera (i.e. becomes darker, at around the sixth second of the vid and it happens repeatedly); if you could cut out a couple frames from that part to stabilize the image, that'd be great. Also, there are a couple frames here and there a bit after where it switches to the pantyhose with a tiny red blurb in them; if you could remove those instances, that'd be neato. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:50, 1 December 2011

Thank you for holding. Your call is very important to us. A customer service representative will have your revised animation ready for you shortly! Thank you for calling MegaConglomerCorp Worldwide!
[click]
♫♪...tall and tan and young and lovely, the girl from Ipanema goes walking...♫♪
 ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Dec 2 '11 15:53 (UTC)

Argh! How much longer will I have to hold this phone against my face?! *grmphf* —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:12, 2 December 2011

♫♪...smell like I sound, I'm lost in a crowd, and I'm hungry like the wollllf...straddle the line, in discor[click]
Hello, thank you for ho'ding, mah name is Chantellllllle, how can I help you today?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Dec 3 '11 2:17 (UTC)

Finally I can talk to a real person! Okay, Chantelle, what I'd like you to do is to pull down your skirt and panties, bend over, aim your phone's camera at your cunt and start moaning. I'll take care of the rest. Oh, and there's still the part in the vid where she moves her leg about without doing much with the pantyhose, so feel free to skip most of that part. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:18, 3 December 2011

Sir, this is a corporate call ceeenter, and mah supervisor is on the line with us raght nay-ow mmmkay? So I'm gow'nta have to ask you to refrain from yewtilizing language like that or I'm gow'nta haveta hang up on y'all mmmkay sir? Nay-ow, what-all was this call in regards to, sir?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Dec 3 '11 13:45 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sure your supervisor will understand, Chantelle. Also, that looks flawless. You can go ahead and GIFitize it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:23, 3 December 2011

Awwwkay sir thank you for calling MegaConglomerCorp Worldwide. Have a nice day.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Dec 3 '11 15:28 (UTC)

Just one minor thingy... Could you let it stay black a little bit longer before changing the animation to the ripping pantyhose? Gotta have some suspense in it, ya know? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:41, 3 December 2011

Done.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Dec 3 '11 16:38 (UTC)

Yup, that's perfect! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:40, 3 December 2011

Dear sir

You are the next of kin to the deceased Nigerian Mbougou Zoulou for the sum 12MILLION US DOLLAR. Just send me 350$ to cover bank unlocking account /joke

I am wondering if you could give a quick proofreading and opinion on this: Mount Everest Disaster. If you find I am bothering you with all my proofreading shit, just tell bro no problem! It's just that no matter how hard I try with online dictionaries to stamp out mistakes, there are always some left. Thanks for your great help, you are nice and stuff. Mattsnow 04:13, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

I think I got rid of the most blatant typos. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:34, 24 November 2011

If you want to get a part of the refinery your ancestor possessed, please answer me $1500 US DOLLARS. Last chance. :D Mattsnow 23:52, November 26, 2011 (UTC)

How did the amount of money I was getting suddenly decrease by 11998500 dollars? Hmm, there's something fishy going on here... —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:57, 26 November 2011

Hey, did I do something that sucks? I see you are active on the templates. Did I do something wrong? I am certainly trying my best. Mattsnow 00:01, November 27, 2011 (UTC)

You forgot to put the {{VFD}} part in between noinclude tags. You don't want it to be transcluded onto the pages the templates are used on, you see. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:07, 27 November 2011

Just trying somehow to do the right thing. Being nice to everyone could prove to be difficult. I always strive to do it. Mattsnow 00:22, November 27, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, I wasn't criticizing your conduct. You're one of the nicest people around the place, to be honest. Just try to remember the noincludes when you want to nom a template in the future. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:25, 27 November 2011

Err thank you. I guess I'll make sense of this when sober! Mattsnow 00:40, November 27, 2011 (UTC)

I sobered up! Now I understand! MIRACLE!!!!! Mattsnow 17:08, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

Hurrah! God exists after all! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:26, 3 December 2011

Delete the following:

As part of improvements, I'm trying to rewrite the whole Goa Tse Clan page to advertise where we can make decisions that can affect the whole of Uncyc. So here's the list of articles you must delete:

• User:Joe9320/haven- NO JAPANESE ALLOWED!
• User:Joe9320/Goa Tse Clan/Giratina's Warriors

That's all I want for you to delete. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 10:46, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

It seems Chief already fulfilled your request. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:09, 30 November 2011

Tag removal or something

Hey man, when you close VFD nominations, could you be a dear and not use rollback to remove the VFD tag from the pages, or something? When you do that it looks like you're being troublesome again or something and just gives the wrong idea or something. Edit summaries are good. They... make things clearer. So please use them or something. Something.

Or something. 1234 ~ 10:48, 3 December 2011

I normally wouldn't have done it that way, but if I had edited that article the normal way, it would've automatically removed most of the carriage returns (which were kinda the point of the article). —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:52, 3 December 2011

Wait, I just discovered that the article was actually full of whitespaces. They just didn't show up on the actual page because the wiki automatically turns multiple whitespaces into one when rendering them. That explains why any of the previous edits didn't automatically remove any carriage returns. Sorry for the fluke on my part. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:08, 3 December 2011

o_O Er... right. Good. Should I have any idea what you're talking about, or is this the point where we both smile, nod, and go somewhere else? 1234 ~ 12:37, 3 December 2011

Well, maybe if you took a look at Whitespace (programming language) it might explain a thing or two. Most of what I said can be summarized as "I wouldn't have normally done it that way and the reason why I used rollback eventually turned out to be invalid." But anyway, you don't have to worry about a thing. I'll use edit summaries and stuff in the future. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:49, 3 December 2011

Hello

Sorry to bug you ...repeatedly... but last month, Lyrithya said something about how the new Foolitzer looked like plastic, so I went back and added some gleam to it. I've also asked for her opinion on it; if you two like it, I'll upload the new...new one. :D  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 5 '11 20:37 (UTC)

I didn't think the new version looked like plastic at all, but your new new version is probably even better than the old new version so feel free to upload it. His cheek looks kinda orange now, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:50, 5 December 2011

I didn't think it looked like plastic, either, and even if it did, well, so does the actual Pulitzer. But anyway. It's a medallion, so I guess...shiny! (I removed the orange.)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 5 '11 21:11 (UTC)

"Firefox can't find the server at www.chicksdigshinythings.com." Also, it looks better now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:16, 5 December 2011

Recent categorization

Appreciate the help, thanks. MadMax 21:19, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

No problem at all, kind sir. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:37, 5 December 2011

0.o

Did the software have a brain fart again?! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzeebeever (talk • contribs)

Sometimes edit conflicts fail to be conflicted properly. It happens. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:37, 5 December 2011

Your vote

on my VFH was misguided, but thanks for it anyway. There's no business like show business. Aleister 18:34 7-12-'11

I have no idea what anything is these days, but thanks for thanking me anyway. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:37, 7 December 2011

Mattsnow hates the French

Ooohhh the irony! I guess I hate myself then LOL Mattsnow 14:30, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Apparently. Don't start covering your eyes with yer hair and slitting your wrists, now. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:35, 10 December 2011

Bwahahaha! Mattsnow 14:44, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Hey man what is the code so that there's no Table of contents? I've been looking for that for 10 minutes! Mattsnow 14:59, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

"__NOTOC__" is what you're looking for. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:01, 10 December 2011

Thanks! Mattsnow 15:50, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Judgery thing.

You're up! Pup 01:18 11 Dec '11

Done! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:27, 11 December 2011

You did it wrong. Pup 11:38 11 Dec '11

Huh? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:43, 11 December 2011

Better now? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:47, 11 December 2011

Overall tied first place. I hate ties. They make my neck all itchy. Pup 11:50 11 Dec '11

Oh, I see. Don't worry, I'll change the numbers so there won't be a tie. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:52, 11 December 2011

Much better! Pup 11:57 11 Dec '11

{{VFDc}}

Helps. 1234 ~ 17:46, 11 December 2011

Sorry, I usually don't forget that. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:51, 11 December 2011

After waiting seventeen years

For your twenty elected parties to nine parliaments and thirteen senates ... a coalition of ninety-seven parties have finally agreed to give it a go. The cherry on the pie is that your new Prime Minister is a French homosexual who speaks fairly good dutch for a Waloon. I'm sure everyone was partying in the streets! --ShabiDOO 04:15, December 12, 2011 (UTC)

Not really. It's more that most people sighed of relief behind their television screens, then went back to whatever they were doing. Wait, do we even have that many parties? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:32, 12 December 2011

Having a minority government can be fun. Just look at us - It's amazing how little gets done when the balance of power is held by two rednecks and a hippy. Pup 10:51 12 Dec '11

It's only a minority government on the Flemish side. And that's basically because most Flemish people were stupid enough to vote for the troll party. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:56, 12 December 2011

Which one is that? The Flemish block party?? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:08, December 12, 2011 (UTC)

Bloc party. BLOC PARTY!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 12 '11 11:58 (UTC)

That's not what he means, Bizzeebeever. It's a literal translation of what the party used to be called. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:07, 12 December 2011

I...was...making fun of someone else who...nevermind.

camera rises above the scene, as Bizzeebeever slowly walks away with his boombox, sadly muttering, "No Bloc Party."  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 13 '11 6:11 (UTC)

Socky remains ignorant as to the true meaning of Bizzeebeever's allusion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:48, 14 December 2011

They used to be called the Vlaamse blok when I lived in Flanders and they had the most politicaly correct slogan in the word: "aanpassen of opkrassen" which was directed to their beloved immigrants meaning more or ess "Adapt-or-leave".

There is so much that Belgium can teach us :) --ShabiDOO 12:11, December 12, 2011 (UTC)

They're called Vlaams Belang (Flemish Importance) now. They're the party that hates everything that's not Flemish with a burning passion. But the troll party I was talking about is another party; the N-VA. During the elections, they pretended to be the only sensible candidate, the one that would bring the change we needed. After the elections, they refused to create a government with the Walloon majority party, illustrating that all they wanted was a strong Flemish opposition. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:07, 12 December 2011

Holy fucking shit!

I sure hope you're not in Liege!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 14 '11 1:54 (UTC)

You mean Luik? Nope. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:44, 14 December 2011

Were you in Erps-Kwerps? --ShabiDOO 08:02, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Nope. Keep guessing, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:04, 14 December 2011

Well, Luik, Liège, whichever. They're calling it "Liège" in the English-speaking news media. Glad you weren't there; I presume (and hope) that no one close to you was hurt in the...eh...unpleasantness.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 14 '11 9:39 (UTC)

Not that I'm aware of. There were a lot of people hurt, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:43, 14 December 2011

Pie for you

3.1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510 5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679 ... Pup 11:22 14 Dec '11

Why are the decimals divided into groups of ten? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:07, 14 December 2011

Lindsay Lohan

I added another pic of Lohan from the cover of Playboy. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:25, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. I'll get back to writing the article later today. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:18, 14 December 2011

Where in the world is Socky

...umm ... Knockke? --ShabiDOO 17:30, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

You spelled it wrong. And nope. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:33, 14 December 2011

Are you in ... uhhhh ... Sint Niklas? Zoutleew (Salty Lion)? Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde? Spa?

Or you might be decieving us. Maybe you are from Belgium, FL! Or Belgium, OH. Or Belgium Il! There has to be something sneaky going on!!! --ShabiDOO 21:06, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Nope, nope, nope, nope. Not even those last ones you mentioned. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:08, 14 December 2011

I know where you are. You live in a EU buidling which doesn't officialy constitute Belgian territory and thus the trick, you are in Belgium but you don't live in Belgium. Sneaky! --ShabiDOO 00:27, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Eh, I'm gonna pretend I have no idea what you're talking about. Yep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:35, 15 December 2011