User talk:Ljlego/archive2

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Ljlego.

Welcome to the Uncyclopedia:Hall of Shame

Don't forget to place an entry ! ~ 16:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Mr. Mordillo.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the thank you!

Thekillerfroggy would like to thank you for thanking him

Please accept this redundant template

Thekillerfroggy would like to thank you for thanking him

Please accept this redundant template

o h i d d

its alll jiggly i lo,,,,, bbotro become mym licorice/vcR mE T3H gOBShite!--Fonchezzz 20:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Fuck cock shit asshole COCK GRANDMA COCK

Anyway, this message is regarding your VFH idea. I came up with a modification to it, in which all articles would be divided into 3 sections (like Pee Review is kind of like ATM): All (which shows all nominations as per normal VFH, with no bumping), Fresh (Which shows articles less than a week old from nomination), and Aged (articles on VFH for more than a week). Also, the All section would be there as a method to make the Darwin Rule non-nullified (i.e.: People could still bump in their respective sections, but All still keeps track of where it is in relation to darwining). -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank'd!

Mr. Kearsy
..is so cool, he doesn't have to say anything in order to thank you. Just look into his eyes and you'll know.

You gotta stop writing so well. I'm almost 10 years older than you and you're putting me to shame. ;) Thanks man! --THINKER 06:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

WOAH!

Stop man! You've got too many featured articles! ... Keep up the good work! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 05:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

thank!!!

User:THE...
...could not think of a creative "thank you" template for voting for HowTo:Turn Your Computer On. But thanks for voting anyway.

oops...did I type "thank" instead of "thanks"? sorry :) --THE 11:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

<FMU>

THERE ONCE WAS A COW FROM DUBAI
WHO DIDN'T KNOW HOW TO FLY
HE JUMPED OFF THE ROOF
AND FELL ON HIS HOOF
AND WENT TO THE HOSPITAL TO DIE
so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 15:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

With Thanks

A tall, dark man pushes a note into your hand; it reads:

"The The Don thanks you for voting for

Film Noir. He offers a free secret from

Jimmy the Shoeshine Boy as a reward."

The man turns away, muttering he has an appointent with someone's mom...

Thanks for your vote. Don alun 11:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

BB thanks thee!

For voting for OCRD, Big Brother thanks you! As a gift in return, have a pet Stalingrue.

BB claims no liability if it bites off one of your fingers or three.

Thanks again! -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 11:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I could use an opinion on this

here it is, my complete rewrite based on the concept I've been batting around on IRC. Whaddya think? --THE 22:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

==No worries==

Glad there's no hard feelings. If you're worried that my dislike for My Little Pony will carry on over to articles you write in the future; don't be. a) I vote on the article, not the writer, and b) even though I don't care for that sort of humour, I don't think any less of you because you do.

Cheers, --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:17, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

THANK'D!!

REJOICE!
You have received the
Double-Douser's Award
for exemplary utilization of boiling, scorchingly hot water.

Thank you for helping make
Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?
the most strongly favored article in Uncyclopedia history!

Have this, ya rapscallion! ;) --THINKER 06:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

The Neo-Communism Manifesto...In a Nutshell

So, as you requested, here’s my ideas in a nutshell. Basically, it would be a Communist society, just with some democratic safeguards against corruptions. Probably one of the main problems with Marxism is that once the Communist state is established a Stalin or a Mao comes around and corrupts the system, whereas the Communist state under Lenin was good. Therefore we need some way to make sure that a Communist state with a great amount of power in the government would not be corrupted by some ambitious individual. As such, we should overthrow the existing government, have a quick dictatorship of the proletariat in which we fight the necessary war, establish our government, and then we will switch over to the “Neo-Communist” nation. Here we would have a Communist government, but we would infuse democratic extras such as elections. The elections wouldn’t be marred with the Electoral College like in democracy, but rather a direct vote of the people. There would be no political parties either: there would just be candidates. The people would elect these candidates based on what they say they would bring to the government, etc. Once in office they would have a fifteen year term, and would run the country. We would have Communist ideas where the government divides things up equally. Unlike the Soviet or North Korean governments we would not fund military beyond the basic necessities and instead focus on internal welfare. This would mean that for the first time ever there would be no homeless people; we would have no class divisions. The nation would provide free state-funded colleges so anyone can get a good job, not just people who picked the right parents to be born to. Everyone would have an equal opportunity. Unlike the capitalist economy in which is inherently biased to the rich and the wealthy, we would have a government oriented economy in which items would be accessible to both those who have had useful business lives and to those who have not done so well as to not bias things against the next generation such as capitalism, but still allow freedom of the businesses to be competitive and earn good amounts of money. Things won’t be biased against who your parents were; just because your parents weren’t especially talented doesn’t mean you won’t get an equal chance at life because the Communist government will provide free education and a limited capitalist market. As such, people would live more productive lives making the nation quite rich and wealthy, which would allow for more improvements and things would escalate greatly forever onward. This would be a Utopian society; all we need is some safeguards to make sure some person doesn’t break things. This means that the person in charge, once elected, needs to have some threat to him should he abuse the peoples. Unlike a democratic government in which the leader can only be taken out of office by other leaders, we would have a socialist government in that if 75% or more of the nation would vote for someone to be taken out of office, then such would be done. That means that if you abuse the people, they’ll take you out. It would be a symbiotic relationship between the people and the government. It would be a Utopia. And that, in a nutshell, is Neo-Communism. - Aerfall 03:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to UnNews

Ok, here's your welcome drivel, as ordered. Don't forget to be Bat fuck insane all Thursdays round back of the usual pub, and I'll bring the smokables. Oh, fine, just stick with the pint, and see if I care! Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 02:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Reverend Zim_ulator says: "There are coffee cup stains on this copy, damnit! Now that's good UnJournalism."

Welcome to UnNews, Ljlego, and thank you for contributing some crap, or otherwise attracting my attention. For a quick introduction about how you can write a decent or better UnNews article, please take a minute read our spiffy new Style Guide.

I am your humble servant (in your dreams), and if I may be of help to you, please leave me a note on my talk page.

Good things that can happen to you

You can win awards and prizes! You can become a better writer by subjecting your articles to the scrutiny of UnNews critique machine or UnCanninator shit article detection system. You can become a thorn in the side of Journalism as a whole. You can get promotions, ribbons, and free crockery! You can write stuff your mom would be ashamed to show her friends.

What happened to my article?

If you've submitted an article, and it's disappeared, I may have mercy-moved it to your user space. This means I've probably left a message on your talk page, likely in close proximity to this very message, explaining why.

Your article may have been tagged for ICU if it has significant problems meeting our criteria, or I may have deleted it because you did not register as a user.

Finally, maybe you just pissed me off. I mean, I know I'm a Roshi, and I'm supposed to be all "Zen" about everything, but I have bad days too, you know?

UnNews Audio

If you are interested in doing an UnNews audio, check this out.

UnNews UnFunnies

At present, I create UnCartoons for UnNews all by my onesies, for better or worse. Now, I will never claim that I am a good cartoonist. Fortunately, the internet provides us a way to do all sorts of things simply and easily. I found Stripgenerator.com, a great site to create cartoons with a minimum of talent.

This document is an ongoing effort by me to enhance the obfuscation coefficient of Uncyclopedia; productive changes, and criticism are welcome. Cheers! The Right and Left Reverend Major Sir

Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 17:38, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 02:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU

	The Led Balloon has awarded you a piece of Floridian swampland. They're goin' quick!
	PS: You get this for voting on that UnNews thing I made. Thanks for putting up with my excessive Votewhoring. Stay dry now!

Good luck with the pages you've got up for VFH, too!P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 13:58, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Danke!

--EMC^[TALK] 04:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

A slightly belated thank you

Thanks for the vote!

For showing the good taste/pity to vote for Old McDonald on VFH, 15Mickey20 would like to reward you with a chicken! He hopes you find many uses for this gift.

-- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Dane Cookbook...haha...that sounds funny..

Go for it. I'm gonna clean up a couple things if you don't mind. -RA HB 21:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Ha, yeah I found it through his page. No worries, just a few mistakes cleared up. Nothing major. -RA HB 21:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Nomming as we speak...sort of...like, after I type this, you know. -RA HB 22:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

That would be spectacular, wouldn't it? I've actually been meaning to read all the way through iTrip, and keep getting distracted. From what I've read, I'm expecting a for, I'll go finish it up right now. -RA HB 00:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

HUTTAH! Vote'D! -RA HB 00:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Interesting. I had been under the impression that you were a guy. -RA HB 01:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I knew it! Can't fool me. -RA HB 01:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Sure, why not?

Andorin Kato has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Somebody has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

Groovy

“Groovy.”
~ Bruce Campbell in the films Army of Darkness and Alien Apocalypse

That's what I think of you... you're just so damned GROOVY~ Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 16:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome

I was glad to lend a hand. `Twas no problem. :) Hanyouman 21:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry, I overlooked that. But, yeah, really, I did find it rather amusing to read. :3 Sorry if that's not the best critique, but it's a good compliment, right? Hanyouman 21:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

No prob. :3 Hanyouman 21:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Yo!

Congrats on the feature! --Andorin Kato 05:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

A Citation in need of Seeing

Strangely enough, whenever I'm signed into my regular Citation-Seer account it Uncyclopedia comes out looking like the nihilism page. See?

And yet whenever I use any other account (or am just simply not signed in) this website looks fine. Is this some random n00b prank or somethin'? Or has my name been randomly eliminated?

Reply to this using my Citation-Seer talk page. I can still see it. --68.183.43.125 16:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Um, Ljlego...

IDK whether this has happened to other people's talk pages, or if you did this on purpose, but you might wanna take a look at this. Isn't that just your user page? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

LOL, don't worry about it. Honestly, I thought I'd just been over-using my iTrip. Well, anyways, congrats! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Topic Name

AHEM!

IS THIS SOME KIND OF FUCKING THANK YOU?!

You head on over to the VFH page, and notice that Is This Some Kind of Fucking Joke?! is no longer there. No it hasn't been stolen you fucking moron! It's simply been moved to the Main Page.
Kindly accept this offering of Jalapeño Cheddar flavored Cheetos as a personal thank you from RAHB for voting for it. Now stop viewing this template and clean the fucking carpet!

RA HB 06:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Adopt me?

Can a noob get some help getting articles started and with basic formatting? That'd be much appreciated.

--Santiago 03:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

My page

Do I need to have a contruction sign on my page?

Gratitude

For voting for Hoboeroticism,
Codeine bestows upon you:
One shiny new quarter. Now you can make a homeless guy very happy.

-- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

A mysterious stranger has awarded you a slice of cake!

The icing is extra-frosty!

Eat and enjoy! --* 10:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Danke indeed

No problem, and you're up 10 to 6 (but I'm sure you knew that). -RA HB 21:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Do teh top10 for the next month for me, and give them until the 19th. You may have already done it but I cba to check

Thanks. —Braydie 13:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank'ee

Leoispotter has awarded you a helmet!

Now you can bash your head against a brick wall safely and in style!

Thanks for the review too! -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: God, I'm running out of ways to say thank you

Thanks for the thanks, and about Virginia tech: I don't know. We sort of predicted that it was going to fail last time, and it did, though it was pretty evenly divided. Quite a few people voted for it, but quite a few also thought it was too early and voted against. It's very difficult for people to put aside sensitivity issues, even if they find the article funny. Mind you, it has only been about three months since Virginia Tech happened. But on the other hand, Adolf Hitler took two nominations to get featured. Sometimes a second time around makes people reconsider. Sort of a, "Oh, it got nominated again? Maybe it's not too early after all" sort of thing. Or something like that. The pros and cons are there, but I don't think there'd be any harm in nomming it again. Who knows? Maybe it will make it. --EMC^[TALK] 19:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank You

Manforman has awarded you a booger...

So you can sell it for a lot of money on eBay.
Your vote for HowTo:Deceive people on eBay is greatly appreciated.

My username

Yeah, I know you can change your username in that way...but, for some reason, I like having a username that doesn't match my screenname, sort of like Asteroid B612/Rataube. (It lets me maintain consistency with my other online accounts, and it also lets me use that "quote" about Big Brother being in league with the aliens at the top of my userpage.) However, one thing I would like to find out is if I can reduce confusion by making the page User:Big Brother redirect to User:The Number-One ALF Fan, just as User:Asteroid B612 redirects to User:Rataube. Would I be able to do that, or would that draw the ire of admins? If you know the policy on that, please tell me; if you don't, I might contact an admin. (If you know the proper admin to contact for this issue, that'd also be helpful.) Thanks very much in advance! -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 22:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

That's why I was thinking about getting it cleared with an admin beforehand, although Asteroid B612 is pop-culture/literature-related, if less infamous than Big Brother: it's the home of the "Little Prince" in the story of the same name (which I remember as Le petit prince from French class). The other thing to consider is the fact that a move would make User:The Number-One ALF Fan a redirect, so either way I'll have two userpage links. But, it is still iffy, so maybe it would be best to ask an admin. Do you know who would be appropriate? --

CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 22:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

All right. Thanks! --

CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 10:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

PLS Judging Instructions: Have a Gander

I'm sending you this because you are signed up to judge the Poo Lit Surprise. If there has been some accident or mistake, and you no longer want to judge, please tell me as soon as possible. If you're still good to go, here are the instructions. First, read all the articles in your specified category. Second, judge them. Judge how you like, as long as it's at least somewhat fair and based on merit. And C, post your top 5 articles here, in order: User:ENeGMA/PLS Judging Hit me up on my talk page should these rules not cognizate within you. Thank you again for your continued cooperation in the balletic train wreck that is the Poo Lit Surprise. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

ICU tagged: Nougat

Ahoy there. Noticed you tagged nougat as unfinished. Can you be more specific than "This is not nearly finished. Fix it."? Some guy named Severian seemed to think it was ok as is, but he's probably insane. Any pointers you might have would be kickass and possibly excellent also. -kotra 05:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. To me, the seemingly random concepts are all related (especially to the general dangerousness of nougat). Probably I should make the theme of the article more clear. Although I admit, the last couple sentences are completely random, as well as some of the bits recently added by other people. I get what you're saying about randomness being bad in general. I'll tighten it up a bit, and keep you posted.

Also, I don't know Severian personally, twas merely a bad joke.

Also, N. Ron Hubbard is a sort of play on words of Enron and L. Ron Hubbard. I don't think anyone here would be offended by that, if that's what you mean. Unless you mean it's just unfunny. In which case, fair enough. -kotra 20:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

See, I can write!

Thanks oh so much for voting For on my first feature! Hooray! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:54, 10 July 2007

For the new VFH

I bestow upon you the highest award we give at Uncyclopedia:

Feather in Your Cap Award

This person has done something very helpful for Uncyclopedia, and thus is deserving of a Feather in their Cap. Respect this person.

Keep up the good work and enjoy your new rank in the Order of Uncyclopedia--<<>> 22:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Big grats Ljlego!! XD ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:29, 11 July 2007

Thank you, Ceridwyn! :D-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Congrats from me too! I flatter myself by the thought that my blabberings on the talk page inspired you to expand the Harticle, but then again I flatter myself onan almost daily basis, so not much point telling you this, ey ? -- di Mario 19:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Bribe

Make my article the highest in the land and I shall be your squire. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) !

Gut Check!

Bile Sluggish? Can't Fight the Feelin' Anymore?

Prettiestpretty thanks for your vote on VFH
UnNews:Homeland Security administration declares new "Gut Feeling" threat level

Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

congragulations!

User:THE has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.

You made a joke in IRC. I'm so proud. Let's see if I can find the joke... ah, here we go:

<THE> I wonder if any famous people in real life have accounts here......

LATER...

<Ljlego> THE: I'm reasonably certain that MO is Woody Allen

There it is! A comedic masterpiece, at the least! --THE 00:35, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Uh oh. MO might kill me for that. Or, if he is in fact Woody Allen, lecture me with pompous wording that everyone but me loves, apparently.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

On a completely unrelated note, do you still want me to review HowTo:Be a Gangsta, or was prettiestpretty's review enough to satisfy you? --THE 12:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Article idea

If I decide to make a list, does it absolutely have to be 100 items long? And are there any lists already dealing with ways to commit suicide...not that I fell like killing myself.

Santiago 01:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

What exactly do you mean by saying I should elaborate on it?

Santiago 01:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Well that makes sense, but suicide is already one of the lists...oh well. I'll come up with something even more creative.

Santiago 01:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

why?

why cant we vote on my image yet? please answer on my talk page.

—The preceding unasked for gibberish was spewed forth in an effervescent pool of filth by none other than B0n b0ns (talk • contribs)

Thanks so much for your vote on '667'

	The Led Balloon has awarded you a bowl of Satan's famous potato salad. Who'd have thought he'd be such a good cook?
	PS: You get this for voting on 667:Neighbor of The Beast. *Now go and "be more like that Satan".*

You've helped to make this Led Balloon fly! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

VFH

Can someone make the contents box logical...like columns that read up and down instead of left to right. 1 then 2 then 3, then the next column start with 4, 5, 6, then the third column...ect... Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)

I agree. It wasn't something I was too concerned with but now that Sev mentions it, I'm for that as well. --THINKER 09:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Woah! That's some HOT stackin'!!

The
International Stackers Association of America
thanks you for your continued support of

CUP STACKING!
Which, as we all know, is a totally real sport.

Lj stacks billz, not cupz! Right, impatient gangsta? ;) --THINKER 00:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

PLS Judging

Let's get those results in soon so I don't have to bump if you judging list. Thanks. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Dr. Skullthumper has awarded you a roll of toilet paper for voting on bathroom humor. In fact, you voted for it, too. Really quite a plus. So thanks.

Seriously, treat the toilet paper nicely. It's a bit... you know... sensitive. You might want to laugh at the jokes it makes. Particularly the one about the plunger and the killer whale. God, only heard that one five million times...

– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:35 Apr 06, 2024 00:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: I saw

Thanks pal. I'm thinking next time I'll just replace the whole thing with "...with SAVINGS!!!" -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 02:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Gangsta

Michael Fitzgerald, before HowTo:Be a Gangsta. "Yay! Ife cweam!"

Mike-izzle "Thug Life" F-jizzle, after the HowTo:Be a Gangsta program. "Betta get me that damn ife cweam, cwacka."

Well, here it is: before and after following the Howto. Now, where's my bitches? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Back (From You-Know-Who's page)

So, real life sucks, eh?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

As hell. But still, it's kind of my passion to stir up some controversies here and there and form time to time, and until one day I have find a better place to let off my steam, I'll keep my rights to maintain my irregular presence here. Having said that, of course, this site still blows, and I am quite determined to stand by my message by keeping a reasonable distance from other users and all the while writing what I consider "good-quality articles". So, there you go - if you get my drift. -- You-Know-Who 13:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

User_talk:Zim_ulator#Thanks!

Voted on your VFH nom, now leave me alone ;) Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 18:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Friendly reminder

I hate to come across as impatient, Ljlego, but over a week ago you said you would take a wack at fixing a "couple of poorly oriented pictures" in my article, and so far you haven't touched it. Humble Acolyte of Humor, Radioactive afikomen 04:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Whine

Stay off my turf, Ljlego. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

It's fine, I'm just messing with you :D... but seriously, next time I'll beat your face in. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:01, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

You Judges the PLS! And you didn't fuck it up! Congratulations!

Unlike this template, you're awesome. Congratulations. - ENeGMA

Thanks for taking the time out of your busy schedule to read articles for me for no pay. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

:O!

You shouldn't have done that to Deviousdan! What if he finds out that I put his article on VFD, too? We're both dead men, you hear me? Dead men! -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Bold words coming from you. Surely you don't realize all the things he could possibly do to us! Like... like... leave annoying messages on our talk pages! And replacing a few words in our articles with "poop"! Surely you don't want a person such as that on your bad side. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

.

Since you've helped me with my sig a lot, do you know how to shrink the timestamps to <small> like the rest of the text is. (My sig is located here). Thanks--User:Manforman/sig2 16:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Why is everybody so shy

At least someone is nice enough to make a comment. thanks. I have only been with the uncyclopedia for a few days, and while I was promised a seven day grace period by some vicious admin liars, it has not been 7 days in whole since I joined this outfit, and much of my work has already been discarded by several admins, while much other work has been praised by some others, or ICUed, or, adopted, or whatever you care to policy or police it. My user page keeps links to all my creations and addition and serves as a reference for me and for all admins below the IQ required to master to logging capabilities of the wiki software. My intentions are never malicious, and I have not created many pages. See the detailed list in my page.

For your convenience, I marked RED all the pages you and your friends have deleted, with the aid of an automatic software system called HTML.

Please have your low IQ admin friends read this page, delete it as well, or guide me by telling how many measures I can play during guitar computer breaks before I find my pages blank.

And where do I want to get to?

And where does the Uncyclopedia?

Its great that you are reading my responsive attitude statement, but have you taken the time to read my page or any of the pages that I have created to see if they have some merit in them for the Uncyclopedia, before you jump to conclusions? I have spend much time, and a lot of thought, and am trying to meticulously follow the guidelines which are not really detailed anywhere that I can find, give or take the ignorable policies and other jokes. I can only slowly learn from the evolution of my pages by the Articial Selection performed by the admins, what is considered valuable and is worth the effort. Needless to say, I have no interest in writing that which will be deleted anyway. I expept others to rewrite my work to a point of complete deletion, when they have something to replace it with, which to their belief is funnier, but why delete pages with obvious potential and popular wikipedia siblings? My page has a WIP section with my intentions, and the WIP mark is in those pages. When I first joined, and after a deletion that occured in about a half an hour from the time of writing, an admin had told me about the WIP mark, or maybe it was not an admin, and that I should put it and so people will know that I promise to make it worthwhile in seven days. The WIP boxes themselves also suggest thge same, the texts of which I only saw after the fact.

"Obviously there was some other motive for deletion..."

I have read both those pages and several others thouroughly. If you look at my talk page, you will see you are not the third person to recommend those, nor the forth to be answered in much the same way.

Did you read any of those lately?

This is not a war of any kind. I am a volunteer, though for a private organization. For me its no different then volunteering for the wikipedia. My interests are not the same, but they are there and are not financial in either case. with wiki its idealism, with the Un, I get to giggle while hopefully some better (paid?) comedians get to monitor and better my work, which I must admit, they have done quite well in most cases, for our mutual benefit.

While you say the reasons for the deletions should be obvious, you are unable to detail what they are even in a single case. Nor can the admins, with examples such as: "Too Short" "the uncyclopedia is not a trash can for writers" and other insuting comments I can only find by detailed scrutiny of the logs (and yes, I find them insulting specifically because they are so hard to find, and are not as open as the crack head comments on my pages for everyone to see, which I find rather welcoming and re-assuring like most - the insider log comments should still be civilized, detailed and adress the specfic page, especially when one deletes a page NOT according to Uncyclopedia stated policies).

I have yet to understand the basics: Why on earth would anyone want to delete a five minute old empty stub where its only content is: stub,WIP? Is it at all worthwhile to create such stubs? And if not, how manu of my pages will not be created at all as a result of this disruption in the natural flow of associative creative writing? Should I transpose my work habits, and say, make my private page a list of my ToDo goals with red URLs? Can the Uncyclopedia policies at all support my style of associative shooting from the hip writing?

A WIP, to my understanding, is my promise to fill it in within 7 days, and supposedly that it will not be deleted before. stub, from the wording of the boxes at least, is an invitation for anyone who hits the page to fill it in. I never created a page with no intention to fill it in, and will also put the stub mark in, with the hope someone funnier ill hit it before I do.

It is natural for me to write a page, use some concept for which I will write a separate page, but not likely before I finish exausting from my brain anything that might possibly be funny regarding the current page, later to get back to the empty stub. The stub is created mostly so that when proofreading the current page, I don't get the RED errors of missing links, to help verify that the current work is free of errors. Having the admins breathing on my neck saying reapeatedly: You have five minutes until the destruction of earth is not helpful. A week is bad enough, if you are composing even a small web of pages which try to reference one another. Still my referencing is about 90% to existing articles and images not of my creation.

--Ohadaloni 19:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

My God... and I thought I was long-winded. Radioactive afikomen 01:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

A Tightly-Knotted Thank You

Thank you for choosing the Bow tie
You are now more attractive, more intelligent, and more popular in school.

Thanks youngin' ;) --THINKER 05:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)