User talk:Bizzeebeever/2

Welcome!

Hello, Bizzeebeever, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:

• Beginner's Guide
• Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing on Uncyclopedia
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Bizzeebeever/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If the current colonization doesn't suit your fancy, then browse our rewrite and idea categories. We have lots of articles just sitting around for someone to improve, so don't be afraid - dive right in!

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. Again, welcome!  -- The Zombiebaron 20:15, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

Templates

Uncyclopedia has enough templates. Please don't add more. Thank you. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:32 Jul 14, 2011

Thanx...

...from reviewing my Final Fantasy V. It was a cool review. Maybe you should learn how to use the Pee Review-template? I`d like to see my "scores". And, when your hopefully adding the scores, remember to watch the original version what I haven`t contributed yet, and tell me which one`s the better one? I`d like to know. At your service, OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 11:52 21 July 2011

Cat: you're welcome for my crummy review; I know how to use the template, I just didn't want to, because I don't think I've gotten a feel for the "average" article around here. (There's a pretty vast range.) I think your revision falls right about in the middle, though, which is why I said you should keep working on it, to improve it.

I did take a look at the original version, and I have to say, yes, it was quite terrible. The people who wrote it definitely weren't making an effort. I can say for you, that you are at least trying. Keep it up. If you need anymore advice, ask any time. I'll try to help if I can, and if I can't, I'll be happy to screw it up completely for you! ⇒»Bizzeebeever  (this user has been deleted) 13:34, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Burn!

Change your signature to not resemble mine in the least, or your sig will be Obliterated, personally. Thanks, ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 21:16, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

I just copied mine from Mhaille's, and changed the flag. But certainly, Sir! How's this? ⇒ BIZZEEBEEVER  (fuck you aimsplode) 22:17, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

Wow! OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 12:12 23 July 2011

Incredible. Hey Bizzeebeever, can you change mine to look like that? --ShabiDOO 00:14, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Pee review

Hey there young Beaver, welcome to the site. If you've got a moment or twelve, please take a look at my comments below the review you did. --Black Flamingo 13:58, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Cheers for that. Wasn't so hard was it now hmm? Keep up the good work. --Black Flamingo 18:34, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, Black flamingo, it was QUITE hard. (That's what your mom said.) I broke my hand on that template, you sonofabitch. Congratulations, you are now in my Little Black Book...you know, the one with the gilt letters that simply read, To Eliminate...Dr. Skullthumper knows of it...yeah.

Next time I label something "this is not a review", please don't assume that it is a review. Perhaps it was merely a long comment? Hmm? Hmm? We're allowed to leave long comments on Pees, aren't we? Hmm? Hmm? ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 00:06, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, but that wasn't really a comment, it was a review. You even filled out all the separate review sections. All I'm doing is making sure you get the credit for your efforts. Also, if you need a picture of me for your book I can send you an official press shot. --Black Flamingo 12:30, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

I put "Ceci n'est pas un revue" on it. Does that mean nothing to you, sir!

Anyhoo, I don't want to step on anymore tails than I have in the past three or four weeks, so, thanks, blackflamingo. Carry on. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 01:50, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Actually yeah, I love Magritte. :) --Black Flamingo 19:01, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

:O

Why did you FFW Nigger Dogshit Sandwiches??? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:57, 25 July 2011

STOP DELETING MY CRAP

Dear Bizzeebeever,

I'm pretty sure you know who I am, since I'm the one who had put claims that the United States of America's currency was cheesburgers (in which it is), and then you said that it was an incorrect statement and changed it to American Paper. Let me have you know, sir, that I am not an ordinary person. I work for the CIA, FBI, SWAT, DISH, PIZZA4LIFE, and STFU organizations, and I have supreme authority to arrest anyone who dares to interfere with my work. Therefore, I suggest you change back what you wrote, or my men will come to your house, steal all your food, then arrest you and throw you in a cell with Mrs. Jack Black bin Abdul-Rasheed I. I'm pretty sure you don't want that to happen, so I suggest you better get your ass off your fancy-ass couch (which my men will probably steal) and change your claim of currency back to cheeseburger. Thank you, and good day.

Sincerely, --Mr. Bobby Ray aka B.o.B Smith Watsonson Billiam H. Gates Abdul bin Allah bin Laden Samuel de Jew McHussein UpYoursBeyoch D' King-Of-D'-Ring IV 23:34, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Sir (and I use that term loosely), I'm in the slow, agonizing process of turning that horrible pile of raccoon droppings into something that's actually funny. Changing "American Paper" (which used to be "Chinese Dong", linked to the page "Dong", which, thankyouverymuch, is MUCH funnier in my opinion) isn't helping the process. As for "Fatass America", thank you, I think the article manages to not only GET THAT ACROSS, but DRIVE IT INTO THE GROUND in as many ways as is possible.

Thank you for not reading. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 00:41, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Pssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

My dearest Bizzeebeever, how are you? I just came from the bathroom where I just had the longest piss of my life. Hope its helpfull! Yes, a pee review can be longer than an article. Let me know any time if you want me to explain anything, suggest anything or look over the article again if you don't hate me after the pee review. Its such a shame that a certain British singer took the whole Norwegian terrorism thing so dead serious huh? ttfn.

That time NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE during my sojourn on the internet

This is article got 10 votes on VFD. It is a hybrid inside joke, not a random sojourn, so I'd suggest removing the FFW tag. --Mn-z 02:02, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

I'd prefer not to. But, tell you what: why don't you remove the tag yourself? I had no clue this was Uncyclopedia Dramatica, but apparently newbies shouldn't step on the toes of pasty white admins who think the word "nigger", by itself, makes for a spectacular inside joke. I bid you good day, sir. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 03:00, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Dropout

If you don't think you can make the draft, we can just auto-pick for you and you can still set your lineups and trade and manage your team for the rest of the season. Also, you can return to picking your team once you finish whatever personal things you need to tend to, as it typically takes three to four weeks every year. Get back to me about this and if you'd be willing to consider this option. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:36, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Hi! Things have gotten serious for me fairly quickly, and to tell the truth, I wouldn't be on Uncyclopedia right now, if I didn't need a distraction. I probably won't be able to manage my team, so I figured I'd pull out, and open a spot for somebody else. Sorry. Thank you, though. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 01:45, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that, hope everything works out for you. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:00, July 29, 2011 (UTC)

Ok

Yeah, I listen to the BBC World Service at 11:00PM EST, or as the French call it, "3:00GMT". BTW Your sig look kind of plain. Want me to spruce it up alittle? Just drop me a line if you want it to be.

Thanks, ^{→ (Der_Führerbunker--Wehrmacht Factories)} 01:16, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

Let's see if we can ONCE kill an article over the (repeated) objections of Mhaille

I'm sorry, clearly my opinion is no longer valid here. Thanks for taking the time to make me realise this. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Hell, I's just pilin' on. Don't shoot me! ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 08:47, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

BAAABAAA

Come on IRC I have no-one to talk to. GOD DAMN IT I'M BORED. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:59, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Hey, be nice.

And assume good faith and all that, will you? The bad faith thing is a joke. That said, I don't know what the deal with this is, but generally we don't go around making sockpuppet accusations without significant basis, so could you please not do that, and be a little less confrontational towards other users, especially when they don't appear to be receptive to it? Mind, if you have something you'd like to come clean about, I'm sure you'll find most of the admins receptive... 1234 ~ 13:11, 8 September 2011

Actually, I've got a good reason for assuming sock puppetry on his part. Anyway, he probably gets the joke, seeing as we were having a meme fight on the Recent UnNews template — up until he cheated, at which point I killed ... uh ... myself off? I think I was thinking of myself as a character at that point. Sleep deprivation. Huh? Where am I?

Who the (expletive) are you? 0.o

*shifty eyes* ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 13:20, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

What the heck?

Satanist rituals in my IRC?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 09:38, September 9, 2011 (UTC)

Regarding your comments

Personal attacks are not welcome here. Outstanding citizen 03:07, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

Hmm. Wasn't aware of having made any personal attacks. Should rectify that. Here goes:

Outstanding citizen is an idiot. Nay, he/she is not merely an idiot, he/she is the culmination of many generations of inbreeding betwixt idiots and imbeciles, a horrific abomination whose genesis is worthy of both Poe and Lovecraft. He/she has no more than two brain cells to rub together, although it is most likely that he/she, having only two brain cells, is unlikely to ever make the attempt. Simply put, Outstanding citizen exists only as an admonishment, from Our Most Holy Lord and Creator on High, God Al-fucking-mighty, against anal sex and sister-fucking. IGNORE THIS ADMONITION AT YOUR PERIL.

How'd I do? ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 03:16, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

RE:

Fair enough, just keep in mind that an admin will most likely issue another, more intense ban if your uncivil comments keep appearing on the site. Outstanding citizen 03:46, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

Have you stopped to consider, sir, that your own comments are uncivil? They are messing up the formatting on my user talk page, and are otherwise utterly unwanted. I was enjoying a nice Sunday evening with my slave harem, sir! How dare you interrupt. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 03:48, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

UnNews

Alright, so I finally got through all the UnNews on the UnNews mainpage, and... ugh. Anyway, as you may have noticed, I moved most of the bear things back into your usespaces - they're very silly and just not very newslike, and quite frankly I know both of you can do so much better than that, and I suppose I have to draw the arbitrary line somewhere, although some older ones were worse, but being so much older there just wasn't much point in doing anything with them.

Your userspaced ones are here:

• User:Bizzeebeever/UnNews:UnNews vandals destroy Uncyclopedia
• User:Bizzeebeever/UnNews:Award winning UnNews journalist found dead
• User:Bizzeebeever/UnNews:Statements by Ursine-American professor ignite controversy
• User:Bizzeebeever/UnNews:Renowned polar bear hijacks some nukes and holds the world for ransom

If you want, you may improve them (namely, work on the humour and especially newsiness and lose the vanity) and move them back, but it'd probably be a better bet to just write new material on new subjects instead. UnNews is, after all, a rolling-release, so it's better to keep the thing rolling than keep mucking with what's over, though it's up to you. 1234 ~ 02:39, 13 September 2011

Yah, uh, that sort of crap happens when you try to develop articles in a matter of 30 minutes each, with a theme on a silly subject, and the person you're doing it with can't seem to improvise (and also is sorta fixated on the moral purity of the character they've invented). I'd prefer if they were just deleted, if they don't belong in the UnNews namespace. (All except the "vandals" story? ChiefJusticeDS is gonna use it or something.) Thanks.

Done. 1234 ~ 15:41, 13 September 2011

Wait, you did want it deleted after it was used, right? Sorry, I'll undelete it if you still want a copy. >.< 1234 ~ 15:46, 13 September 2011

Yeah, I wanted to keep that one, at User:Bizzeebeever/Articles/[article name], if possible ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 01:44, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about that. 1234 ~ 02:03, 14 September 2011

User:Bizzeebeever/Articles/[article name]...oh, forget it. ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 02:18, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, HELL! And not that one! The one about "vandals"! "UnNews:UnNews vandals destroy Uncyclopedia"! /me throws hands up ⇒»Biz E.B. Ver  (gabble) 02:20, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

What? It was the one at the end! Did you not link it at all or something? o_O 1234 ~ 02:38, 14 September 2011

Oh, wait, that was me. Weird. They wound up backwards... bugger, shut up. 1234 ~ 02:39, 14 September 2011

NO U

. YOU HAPPY NOW, I HAVE JUST DUMPED HEAPS OF CLOSED <span> TAGS!? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:50, September 26, 2011 (UTC)

Edit conflict

Did you get an edit conflict while editing my TP, bro? Now I have a "You have a new message" on every page I visit.... WTF? Anyway, I tried reverting your edit to see if that's gonna solve the problem... And you new sig is awesome! Mattsnow 19:34, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

...you might perhaps have that "you have a new message" message because I left you a message? :) Should go away after you click the "view messages" link...

No edit conflict on my end...

Also, thanks.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Sep 28 '11 19:37 (UTC)

LOL, of course I did click it bro! At least it seems the problem solved itself after closing the PC for awhile. I really have to go to the PC shop, it's about to asplode!!! Mattsnow 02:37, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

Well, I figgered you'd clicked it, but it's always good to ask the stoopid questions first. What browser you using, by-the-bye?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Sep 29 '11 3:49 (UTC)

IE9, but after a good relaxation while I was earning my bread and butter, the PC decided to work properly. It's been a long time since a new UnNews about polar bears popped up, what's happening? Seriously, they were hilarious. :D Mattsnow 04:17, September 29, 2011 (UTC)

I will NEVER live that down, will I? Fuck you, Izbeenoneweek.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Sep 29 '11 5:35 (UTC)

I just nommed your latest UnNews: Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Renewed violence in 506,220th day of Israeli-Palestinian conflict Hilarious stuff! I just finished one myself: Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Obama: "Iran will have a nuke by 2167!". What do you think about it? It seems I have lost my magical touch since my articles are not getting voted on as much as they used to, but I somehow find them as funny as the ones I wrote back in the days. I guess I'm getting old. Also, no problem if you put your articles on the front page template yourself, I give you the free pass since they are always good so far. Just use your common sense: if you're not too sure it's good, don't put it there. Maybe I will afterward anyway. Only you and Funnybony have that front page template pass so far! But don't change the front page pic please, I'll take care of that one. Later! Mattsnow 11:43, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

Holey smokes, thank you, sir...but I wonder if mine's good enough to make it. (I figured since you'd nominated me for the FP, I should probably do something to deserve it, like, y'know, write some more articles.)

On the template: I asked Lyrithya before posting my article, and as she didn't object (although she didn't bother to read it, either) I figured I'd take a chancer. Hope I didn't overstep my bounds.

As for your article: I'd just seen the headline and image this afternoon, when I posted mine; I'll take a look as soon as I get sober again. I doubt you're losing your touch, although I suspect I can't say the same thing for myself. I was good at this, damnit — for a week or so, anyway.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Oct 5 '11 12:10 (UTC)

LOL, thanks for the tweaking on the UnNews! I soiled my trousers! Mattsnow 04:33, October 6, 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. But look what some IP added. If that's not the perfect one-letter addition, I don't know what the hell is. Wish I'd thought of it.

If you'll excuse me, I'm off to watch the thrilling conclusion of...High Plains Drifter, starring Clint Eastwood.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Oct 6 '11 5:43 (UTC)

The Shining

When I saw this was on VFD, I quickly scrolled down to say to the admin to move it to my userspace, but I saw you beat me, bastard!!!! I saw that movie 10 times and am still fascinated by it. Would you like to collab on it if it gets deleted? There is so much potential there! Have you read that one? I saved it from VFD once with a big STRONG KEEP and a long explanation. I hope you don't feel pressured man, it's your call, but I'd really want to collab with you on it. Or else, you'll go in the REDRUM. I'll go vote against it, so it gets moved to your userspace. Shhhhh... Mattsnow 03:14, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

Maybe they should redirect The Shining to "All work and no play" — that article was one of the first ones I read on here, and I laughed. Hard.

I dunno how much better you or I can do; I'm currently working on something that's written from the point of view of each of the characters — including Jack Nicholson's axe. Sadly, that last part seems like the only one that has any potential. If you're awake right now (5:42 ET), get on IRC, and let's suss this out.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 8 '11 9:45 (UTC)

Pac-Man (walkthrough)

No problem but I don't see how you could improve this article unless you beat level 8! WiiKend 08:37, October 11, 2011 (UTC)

Sparta?

THIS IS NOT SPARTA!!!

Thanks for the nom and vote. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:07, 14 October 2011

The only not cool looking thing on your userpage

This: . —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:36, 14 October 2011

I KNOW, brah! Workin' on it. I need the KEWLEST page on the 'Net, tots!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Oct 14 '11 22:38 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!

-- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 1 November 2011, at 01:18

FPrize

	Foolitzer Prize Winner October 2011

-- KittyKitty (t) (c) 05:57, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Knock knock

You there, dude? Another image request sprung to my mind. It shouldn't be too difficult as it just involves copying a couple YouTube videos into one animation in a {{multiple image}} kind of way. The only issue might be having to fit all of those videos into a 320px wide box. Interested? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:52, 1 November 2011

Nope. But ask Bizzeebeever, he may be interested. Mattsnow 16:14, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

That's what I'm doing, actually. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:26, 1 November 2011

Sock: surewhynot. First question: are the vids the same length? Second, we're talking about the end result being a *.gif, right? Third: what are the links.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 1 '11 22:36 (UTC)

P.S. Whatcha doin' here, Mattsnow? This ain't your talk page. Shoo. Shoo! Go home.

1. Probably not, but you can choose where you start and end the separate videos as its only a very specific part of the videos I'm interested in.
2. Yup, a gif.
3. I'll have them in a couple minutes. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:56, 1 November 2011

Alright, so I guess I should explain what this animation is all about. It's for my new article Japanese TV series centered around a game where large creatures are summoned from something smaller that tends to have a real-life equivalent of the game in question, except in real life, you don't actually get to summon large creatures. The animation is supposed to illustrate the large-creatures-appearing-out-of-smaller-stuff aspect of the TV series (plural) in question. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:44, 1 November 2011

Um...ok...are these animations supposed to be side-by-side, like a scene from an episode of 24, or ...overlaid on each other? I'm confoozled now.

(Also, on the wiki-globe thingy, are you sure I didn't make the end result too dark? I can't tell anymore because my eyes fell out.)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 1 '11 23:54 (UTC)

Side-by-side, in multiple rows and columns. The caption beneath it is gonna be "Take your pick."
(It's perfect the way it is, trust me.) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:59, 1 November 2011

First up is Pokémon with this video. The part for the animation starts at around 0:55 with Ash summoning Sceptile and ends at around 1:36 as Latios is released from his pokéball and hovers above the ground. There's a lot of fighting scenes in between those two points and you're allowed to leave out most of it, but you should definitely include the part where Ash says something with this outer space like background starting at around 1:19 and onwards with Sceptile summoning green light sabers out of his elbows and slashing Darkrai with them. How much you decide to leave out will mostly depend on how long the parts of the other videos are. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:59, 1 November 2011

0.o

This is gonna be a pretty huge .gif!

You mean byte-wise or pixel-wise? Either way, in the end you're gonna have to scale it down to a mere 320px, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:08, 2 November 2011

Second up is Digimon, with this video. This time all you need is 1:24 up until the end of the video. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:09, 2 November 2011

Third up is Yu-Gi-Oh! with this video. From 0:10 till 0:37 please. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:32, 2 November 2011

Fourth up is Beyblade with this video. From 1:44 till 2:22 please. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:51, 2 November 2011