User:MrN9000/TalkArchives1

I Like Fish

	:: THE RANDOM POSTCARD ::
	I don't know what the hell you're saying, But I like it! -Zana Dark

Welcome to UnCyclopedia.org - We NEED YOUR HELP. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 22:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for making me feel welcome! It's nice to see that someone has actually read something I have written!

Your New and Improved Signature

A signature you can edit. User:MrN9000/sig To use it, in your preferences click the raw signatures link and paste this code into your 'nickname' field: {{SUBST:nosubst|User:MrN9000/sig}}

Looks like this right now: MrN

Hope you like, and enjoy!!!

~Formerly Annoying Crap 17:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Sig

Please refer to Uncyclopedia:Signatures and follow the guidelines there for your signature. Thanks. --Andorin Kato 19:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you.

Also, please sign your comments on forums and talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your... hey! You were never properly welcomed. Let me take care of that. --Andorin Kato 20:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, MrN9000/TalkArchives1! I'm Andorin Kato, and I'll be your designated Uncyclopedian welcomer today. Congratulations on deciding to join Uncyclopedia! Most likely I've noticed your contributions in Recent Changes, and decided that you need a proper introduction to this strange new world you've entered. If that's the case, then take a look at the following links: Beginner's Guide How to be funny and not just stupid The above links outline the basics of what Uncyclopedia is (and isn't) and the two fundamental rules of being an Uncyclopedian. Make sure you give them a whirl. Also, if you want more information about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these: About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends The QVFD page, the inevitable fate of articles about your friends, schoolmates, teachers, etc (in other words, people we've never heard of and aren't likely to care about), blatant one-liners, and things like this Our in-jokes page, in case you ever get confused I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! If you treat Uncyclopedia well, it will reward you with a whole new world of philosophy, science, literature, opinion, and just plain classic comedy. When posting on forum pages, talk pages, etc., please sign your name by typing four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date, and avoid the aggravation that goes along with unsigned comments. If you need help with anything, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Village Dump (article-related concerns should go in Pee Review and nothing-related comments should go in Benson's place). One final note: if you're interested in learning about Uncyclopedia at the hands of an experienced editor, please drop by our Adopt-A-Noob page and request adoption. So once again, welcome to Uncyclopedia, and have a great time! --Andorin Kato

Thank you! --MrN

Boys and girls, if you take a look at the history...you will find out that you're both too late. Hence, stop fighting. MrN9000, you are very popular these days....:) ~ 20:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Reminds me of the time I... Hm, cant actually think of an example... MrN

So a sausage walks into a bar and asks for a pint... The barmans says "Sorry mate, we dont serve food in here!

Am I worth somthing all of a sudden?

Maybe one of you could answer a few questions. What's the best way to create a sandbox to edit in? What's with the namespaces? What does the /USER /???? mean? I guess it has something to do with where it can be searched for or something. How do you delete a page in your user space? Or possibly protect it (not that I would need to, im sure). RE the sigs, is there a way to add the date time automatically in the sig? :P

MrN

To create a sandbox, create the page User:MrN9000/sandbox. Articles that are in namespace are generally only edited by the person who owns them and aren't deleted except by user request; they're generally "safe." To delete a page, list it on QVFD. For protection, talk to an admin. And you should be automatically adding the date/time with your sig if you're using four tildes. Let me look into that. --Andorin Kato 20:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

MrN 20:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah!!! Thanks! MrN 20:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC) That's a lot less effort!

Cool Thanks.

So what would be the difference between:

http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/MrN9000/Sandbox1

and

http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:MrN9000/Sandbox1 ???

MrN 21:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

The first one is in mainspace, because there isn't a User: tag before the MrN9000. The second one is User:MrN9000/Sandbox1, so it's under your username. The first one, lacking the User: tag, would be a subpage of the article MrN9000, which doesn't exist. --Andorin Kato 21:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Ridiculously late response

You're right, linkifying is a great way to get people to notice your article. Pee Review is another, even better, way. Yes, categorizing works. An article can have as many categories as you want it to, though having forty or so categories would be a bad idea. Generally, the more the better.

You won't have to worry about link spamming unless: you put links to your page on a ridiculous number of articles (some of which don't even have to do with the article... yes, we get people that do that). One thing you could do is go to soccer and add a link to Moving the goal posts somewhere, or even a sentence or two to support the link. (Like "Another popular technique by <insert team here> is moving the goal posts." Links are, according to BGBU, "the blood veins of a wiki." Much like categories, the more links to and from articles, the better. Basically it doesn't become spam until you are creating four links a minute without any regard to where they are or what they link to. As long as you exercise common sense when linking stuff, there won't be any problems.

On the subject of userpages: anything that's in your userspace is YOURS. To be edited by YOU and to be shaped entirely how YOU want. If anyone has a problem (which, unless you write slander, there shouldn't be anyone with a problem), it doesn't matter. Your userspace is your kingdom. As for your subpages, there's a special page called Special:Prefixindex that will list all the subpages of any page. Type User:MrN9000 into the box to see the pages that are in your userspace. Alternately, you can just bookmark this link and refer back to it when you need to look at something.

The construction tag will probably increase the chances of people editing it, if it makes a difference at all.

You sure ask a lot of questions. :) But that's a good sign. It means you're learning. Good man. --Andorin Kato 03:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks to people like you, I'm getting there (apparently I'm nominated for an award!)... Sorry about so many questions, I have found the on-line help to be ok, but not what I would call great... I'm almost starting to wonder if it's done in such a way as to keep information which might be useful to a vandal from getting into the hands of the vandal... Meaning you need to be bothered enough to try quite hard to find something! But hea I like a nice conspicuously me... Thanks again MrN 12:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Thnx for that....

Thnx for that, and yeah, I knew both of those things, I was on Halopedia for a while, but haven't been there in a while, so, I kind of am not remembering to sign stuff. Sorry about that.

-Guitarplayer001 00:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Your welcome, I'm always forgetting myself... MrN 00:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Need Help?

Tell me if you would like some help with your article, Black vs. White. I've already taken a look at it and know that this article will be good once it is fleshed out a bit. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

You stalker you how did you notice!!! I'm always open to suggestions offcourse... I don't want to put it into the main user space just yet until it's a bit more finished, and will have to finish working on it now for a while, but by all means help yourself. I need a black and white picture of some people playing snooker if you can get hold of one and put it where the colour one is? I don't have a decent photo editing program here at the moment... Any ideas you have for new sections would be very appreciated. I don't know how many people will get all the jokes, cos their mostly tecky related and rather British. Do you think they will? MrN

If I got the techy jokes, I'm sure most of the other people on this webpage will, because for one, I am not very good with a humor sense. Otherwise, I will notify you if I got any ideas or stuff like that...-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Cool... I have to get off the computer now, but will be back on later (probably about 2 hours or so) maybe catch up with you then. Have fun QVFDing the pants! MrN 21:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I have to get off the computer now too. I'll be back on tomorrow. Cya until then. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

About the "vandalism" mistake

I forgive you. --Juan Gustavo 20:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Re:Redirect

No problem, I wasn't sure if it was supposed to be capitalized or not, but the "coler" stuck out like a sore thumb (unless that was also supposed to be misspelled... in which case: sorry?) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem... Actually it was spellt "coler" on purpose... Check out User_talk:Tom_mayfair if you fancy... You would have needed to read the whole of The Color Problem to get the joke I guess... It's no problem, I'm sure you would not have been the last to think it an error and move it, so it probably made sense that it was moved now, rather than wait for me to have to move more red links later when someone else moved it... Actually I think it was more funny with the re-direct given the article and the fact that the Wikipedia redirects Color to Colour (or so I'm told, never bin there you understand)... I thought that you had done it as a slant on us poor Brits! No offence was taken either way... You Americans do rule the Interweb after all... And color 'was' meant to be in lower case cos color is not important you know;) Have fun MrN 01:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Fixed pee

No worries, and yes, the score was bollocks. I might have a proper look at it myself if no-one's reviewed it properly by the weekend, but with work the way it is, I might enjoy a weekend away from a PC screen entirely! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:24, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Totally understand... My Project Manager is always Moving the goal posts on me... :D (Ducks to avoid the slap with a kipper for shamless name dropping) Have a good weekend... MrN 11:01, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Logical fallacy

Just so you know, the edits made by 66.108.194.12 on Logical fallacy are valid, as they are the same IP that created the article. Please do not continue to revert their changes except to re-add the ICU tag. Also, I have the page watched. Thank you for your time.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   04:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)  

Back from my talk - Err... right... Sorry, capitalization error. I always forget that it matters in wikicode. The history in question is this one.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   19:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)~  

Ah, Agreed... MrN 19:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Since you mentioned it...

I could use a review on The GazettE- although I have to warn you the article may be slanted towards the band's own fan base. I'm trying to get it out of the ICU at the moment, so feel free to be as harsh as you want. I am prepared to completely re-write it if I have to.

Also, you're welcome for the comment. The article really was a pleasure to read, so an additional thank you for writing it. --Komodo Gallant 00:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Cool. I will take a look, but I have not done a review myself before, so don't take too much notice of the scores I give, but will do my best. MrN 00:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, that was actually really helpful. I think I'm going to re-work through the whole thing to try and follow your advice, it really does need it. You're not a bad reviewer at all, maybe you should hang around the pee review more often. From what I can tell, it really does need more activity. --Komodo Gallant 02:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Whydyoudodad?

This seems like an odd edit, what with the editing out of someone else's contribution and all. I reverted it, as I am unaware of a reason to justify the edit. Don't keep me in the dark. Or do. I glow. It's kind of cool, actually. But I digress. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Woops. My bad. I was too hasty and did not notice the purpose of this page and thought that a user had "sig"ed something which they had done. My apologies, I'm still a bit N00by I guess, well spotted... MrN 09:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

No biggie. I should point out that if you do it again, we throw you in the volcano. Well, it's not really a volcano. It's more like a pile of leaves, but some of them are mighty pointy! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Michael Jackson

wat thef fuck? Why the hell did u revert the edits of Michael Jackson why did u erase my writing?--Themadnessguy 20:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I reverted it because I did not consider that the phrase:

"Michael Jackson is Catholic and is a complete retart. He molests almost every kids and loves doing it."

Significantly added to the article. It was also your first contribution to the Uncyc (according to your history) and to me appeared to be the actions of a vandal. MrN 20:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the review!

Rejoice, MrN9000! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Thank you for reviewing GarbageLand! --THE 21:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey man!!!!1!!!!1!!!1111111111!!!!!!!11111

CONGRATULATIONS!!! You have won a raffle for tickets to

THE DRUNK OLYMPICS!!!
Of course, when we did the raffle we were drunk, and all the other tickets except yours were spilled and blown away, but still! Congrats!

Thanks!!!!1111111!!!!!!!!!!11111!!11!!!!!1 --THE 01:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Would you mind if I fucked up your talk page?

hahahaha!   Le Cejak • <-> Nov 29, 01:05

Guess I will just have to grin and bear it... MrN 01:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I GET IT!!!!!   Le Cejak • <-> Nov 29, 01:11

Cool

Together, us n00bs can make gay our own ^^ we can collaborate in awesome-ifying it up perhaps?~Fag x FS 19:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Looking good so far... I'm thinking we could edit it (I just got it unprotected) one by one, make it a step-by-step collaborative work ^^~Fag x FS 19:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Sure dude. I will keep an eye on the article, if I think of anything else to add I will... MrN 19:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Seen what ywv done so far... good work. I've started adding (plus helping with formatting, spelling etc.) so keep an eye out ^^~Fag x FS 08:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey guy

Why the hell did you revert my update @ FC Barcelona players? Pointless contribution as yourself say in your page! --– Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.63.195.212 (talk • contribs)

Unfortunately it's kinda hard to tell... I can only identify you from your IP address (83.63.195.212). There is no IP of that name on the history, so it's rather hard to tell what you did and did not do. I guess your using a dynamic IP address which has changed since you last logged on... What happened is that I saw that the below edits had been made, and considered them vandalism.

"who the fuck wrote this!!!!!! Oh! me now i remember i'm stupid! lol"

"Yes, Its you, you nit witted blubber headed dumb idiots!"

"Barca fans call him the blondie because hes as useless as a dumb blond girl and has blond hair."

I did a comparison between the current version, and what appeared to be the last reasonable edit by a registered user and did not see a great deal which I considered added to the article. Mostly I reverted all of these edits back to what appeared to be a better version.

Perhaps I could suggest that if your serious about editing the Uncyclopedia you register an account so that in future people will be able to identify your work.

Thanks. MrN 02:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Colour Problems

Hey, I got that it was about racism! I guess I didn't understand the British bits too well, being a Wisconsinite, I would have gotten Mosaic browser and that Apple from 1989, but I hadn't heard of the other computer stuff (I now know why). I was like, who are these gay guys in this first part and what does it mean? Anyway, I'm one of few Americans to spell color colour, and labor labour, but I haven't gone the way of metre yet! Anyway, check out my article Wire tapping. Even if it doesn't deserve the front page, it is still pretty funny! --Ggarfield 17:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I see you changed something on it. How does "tapped-up the pope" make any sense? I didn't change it back, but...is this another British thing, b/c tapped-up sounds a bit like nonsense to me :(

Thank you, good sir!

You voted... ...for Francis Winkler! In the name of all state-employed public educators of unstraight persuasion everywhere, thank you!

Thanks! --Andorin Kato 02:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Why, hello, sir!

I must say, you look intelligent. Perhaps you'd like to partake in some of my Miracle Tonic? Guaranteed to cure what ails ya! Got a cold? Going bald? High mortgage rates? No problem for my miracle tonic!

	The Led Balloon has awarded you with a FREE* case of Honest Jim's patented Miracle Tonic.
	*Not actually free. Side effects may include just about any horrible diseases we can come up with.

Thanks again for voting, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:14, Dec 4

You are doing a GOOD job on pee reviews

Cajek has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Keep it up, please. You may get a nomination for UN:RotM if you continue to play your cards right.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 00:42)

Somewhat in relation to the above post

I've noticed that you seem to be making good contributions to Pee Review, and as such I, Captain Catheter Boomer, do cordially invite you into to People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness. Should you choose to accept this invitation, please send me your social security number bank account numbers YOU'VE WON A FREE LAPTOP! FREEFREEFREE! sign under the Fresh Stain section of the main page. If you're a good boy, soon I'll promote you to a rank that we're currently trying to figure out in the talk page. Anyway, the only real benefits of joining currently are just having the knowledge that somebody (me) thinks that they have some kind of "authority" over you and a fancy title, but I may eventually get off my lazy ass and add some incentives. The first one is also only a benefit for me. Hope you join, and glad to have you. Keep up the good work. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey Boomer, what are the ranks? Not that it matters, just curious.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 01:18)

How can I turn down such a lucrative sounding offer! MrN (01:26, Dec 5 2007)

*ahem*

@ Cajek: I guess they're not really ranks so much as they are titles. The only real rank is Captain Catheter, and that only means that you can change parts of PEEING without me whining about it. Other than that, the title only shows the rest of the site that you're a good reviewer and gives you a wonderful sense of superiority over the lesser beings.

@ MrN9000: You can't, if you want to live. /me sinks into the shadows. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Um, Sorry Boomer, you lost me there. Can't what? MrN (03:51, Dec 5 2007)

TOOLATEHESGONE!!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 03:55)

/me slowly walks out of the shadows, dramatically and gradually causing my features to come into focus until eventually stopping, with my face still half hidden in shadows and mysterious red dots somewhere around the region of my ears. You cannot turn down my offer, as doing so would cause you to die. And dying would cause you to have to stop editing Uncyclopedia. And stopping editing Uncyclopedia would cause you to die. You don't want that to happen, do you? Also, don't ask about the ears. It's very personal. /me slowly backs into the shadows, suddenly giving a loud "TOOT" and disappearing amid a pink cloud of smoke and rainbow confetti. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

DAMNWHYCANTIBETHATMYSTERIOUS?!?!?!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 04:00)

MrN9000 reviews

Hey, thought I'd do a little work for you (thanks for the votes!!). Here are your recent reviews from earliest to latest. Again, check out User:Cajek/Pee:

1. Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The GazettE
2. Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Platoon I think I thought that this was too short, but it could be long enough
3. Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/GarbageLand
4. Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Josh Server
5. Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/crying Yeah, too short I think
6. Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Albus Dumbledore: out of the closet at last?
7. Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/American flag lapel pin

  Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 19:40)

Ahh, Cool. Thank you. I will make a page for em... Is that all of the ones I have done worth saving? I had a look at your page. Don't see a problem with it. Unless the "Mysterious One" has an issue, we don't want to upset him now do we... It's a thing for people that do pee-reviews I guess... MrN 19:45, Dec 5

no, these are only the ones that count on my pee page. If you have done other ones, you would have to search through the category:reviewed to find them. If you DO find them, show me 'em and we'll figure out if they count as "in-depth" reviews. I'm missing one of your reviews because on my pee page it says you did 8 reviews. Only seeing 7 here...? Good idea making a separate page for your reviews, it'll be easier to see what you've done when we get down to next month's voting.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 19:56)

Top 10 All-Time

User:Cajek/Pee
#	user	# of reviews	# of "in-depth" reviews	% of reviews "in-depth"
1	√ ChiefjusticeDS	197	197	100%
2	√ Black flamingo11	134	134	100%
3	√ UU	132	131	99%
4	√ PuppyOnTheRadio	108	105	97%
5	√ Lyrithya	102	101	99%
6	√ Hyperbole	101	100	99%
7	√ Saberwolf116	100	94	94%
8	√ Gerrycheevers	89	82	92%
9	√ Orian57	77	75	97%
10	√ Mnbvcxz	75	73	97%

Top 5 (September - December)

User:Cajek/Pee
#	user	# of reviews	# of "in-depth" reviews	% of reviews "in-depth"
1	Snippy	3	3	100%
2=	Murder Frog / Zheliel / Simsilikesims	2 / 2 / 4	2	100% / 100% / 50%
4=	Oliphaunte / Kamek98 / Chief	1	1	100%

Top 5 last month (August)

User:Cajek/Pee
#	user	# of reviews	# of "in-depth" reviews	% of reviews "in-depth"
1	Snippy / GlobalTourniquet / Scofield	1	1	100%
2	Ferric AlFerrous	2	0	0%

Uh oh, someone is coming up close behind you! Hopefully they'll just pass you by.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 @ 05:42)

Congratulations on your featured article!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 @ 13:02)

Many thanks! I put quite a lot of effort into that one! Hopefully people will find it funny, and perhaps (in some small way) help regarding the real subject of the article... I wonder how long it will be until someone calls me racist because of it...

I'm off to do a pee-review anyway, this rather brilliant man has used subtle and almost subliminal mind control techniques on me and I'm now powerless to prevent myself from pissing! When you got to go, you got to go I guess... Seriously though, good on you for trying to get more people to do Pee-reviews, it needs to be done. I think I'm going to take the stance now that I will put in an amount of effort relative to the article which has been submitted. If the submitter has not done that much, then I will maybe give a few suggestions, but not say much more than "Work on it more and come back when when you think it's almost finished". In my eyes Pee-review should not be used as a way of whoring articles which you can't be bothered to finish, but should really be, well a pier review of a basically finished work. That's just what I think anyway...

Enjoy. MrN 13:18, Dec 6

Thank you! Smiles to you, my friend :) As far as reviewing goes, I don't look at what you reviewed, I just look at the length of your review and I scan for remarks such as: "WTF??!?!? THIS NOT FUNNY I HATE YOU". I'm glad that you think I'm being subtle and subliminal about this. Again, kudos on the feature!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 @ 13:24)

Help?

Hey now that I've helped you out with your color problem will you help vote for my article Why?:Does Christopher Meloni not have an emmy yet?

I did actually read that one a while back... However I did not vote on it at the time. I don't really "get it" I'm afraid. Though I'm sure that a lot of other people might I did not find it funny enough to put onto the front page. Well, I went back and read it again after you asked (above) and am afraid that I'm still not going to vote on it now. I will keep an eye on it though, if it gets better, I will vote on it then. Enjoy. MrN 20:12, Dec 6

A test of the Emergency whore Nofu Alert Campaign System

The following message is provided by a American vote "whore". Deep Breaths....the vote "whore" recognizes what they are, a vote "whore"! Unfortunately, a synonym for vote whore is "American Politician". The only way you can stop the Americanism whoror is to actually vote for them, or they might just keep Americanizing whoring. Stupid Americans Whores.....

Anyway:

(John Wayne narrates:) Hello partner, it's me, Le Marquis de Nofu, here to ask you to check out my article Wire tapping. If you like it as much as I do, my friend, vote for it here: VFH Wire tapping. Also, I have been bestowed with the honor of nomination for Noob of the Month. Check out my contributions and Home Page. If you like the work I've been doing around here in QVFD and PeeReview, vote for me here.

Thanks ya'll., --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 04:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

This sarcastically Southern American (written by a Northerner) overly exaggeratively friendly message paid for by the sweat of small unpaid children and minors Friends of the Nofu Aristocracy Foundation.

Well,MrN9000, what do you think? Is this a go. I don't know if I like it as much as the original add. I'm kind of thinking of dropping the add campaign entirely. Otherwise, is there a way I could do an audio bit? I bet it would be funnier.

--Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 16:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Guidelines

Take a look! I'm going to bed.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 7 / 07:04)

cool, catch u later. MrN 16:29, Dec 7

Look at what? Did you change anything from last night? I don't understand. User:MrN9000/Sandbox1 is where I was working, did you look at that?MrN 16:35, Dec 7

In Cash...