User:Clorox/talkarchive1

I've always wondered what this page is ever used for. Well, never mind. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 02:44, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC) (updated 22:05, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC))

Pornography I would imagine.Distinction 00:04, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Maybe... but I'm a Goatse Virgin, and I'm pretty sure I'm not going to whitehouse.com either. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃

Thank you --Chimzar 21:32, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

ADMINS SEE THIS

Please don't post anything about one of my blocks unless you actually blocked me. As seen below,

It's just like Office Space. I make a mistake, and I have eight different people whine at me about it. EVERYBODY PLEASE JUST SHUT UP.

Get it?

Also, don't ban me without threatening me first. Then I'll know what to stop doing. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 12:39, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

---

Many times the admins confer on bans, either on Uncyc or especially on IRC, so they may all have insight to confer. (Yes, I just used "confer" in two different but proper ways in the same sentence. Bow down.) Your indignation is unbecoming. And do stop being so rude to people (see #Ninjastar). --—rc (t) 03:25, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

It was only a joke. Jeez. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 02:09, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

<text deleted at request of user>

Not by Famine's request, nor mine. Are you trying to remain in the doghouse permanently? Seems that way. Do you really need to be threatened to observe rules of common sense? Speaking of which, never edit an admin's page, and I'm referring to this edit on BobBobBob's space. I haven't made any changes to your personal pages, have I? -- T. (talk) 03:48, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

<text restored at request of sysop>

In case you missed it, that was a threat that RC just made. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 03:07, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Things Clorox should know: (a) Lumbergh doesn't work here, (b) this isn't about T.P.S. reports, (c) multiple admins are on you now because you continued to tinker with stuff even after you were warned and banned, (d) we will continue to do so until you clean up your act and (e) yes, i said we. So (2nd warning) play nice. -- T. (talk) 19:32, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

User Page

Should you need some useful work to occupy your free time (and you do), I'd suggest a serious revamp of your User Page. It does not compare favourably with most on Uncyclopedia.

Including the blank ones.

For future reference, Pot v. Kettle is only an article, and for humour only. In real life, pointing the finger at someone else's backyard when your own weeds are 2 feet high will probably attract negative attention—and earn you a reputation—you won't like. So play nice. =) -- T. (talk) 00:02, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

new babel level

Adding a new level is much harder than adding a new language. You have to create 3 templates (including Template:LangLevelText F, and then add it to every single category page, as well as the main babel page. I think F isn't unique enough, go with an existing one. --Splaka 02:54, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Problem. What are the other two? --Bleach

Read this thoroughly: Uncyclopedia:Language_Templates --Splaka 03:00, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Done. --Pretty obvious who posted that word

You haven't even started to begin. You have to add it to the level lists of every language category currently existing (the cost, for adding a new level). I told you to read that page thoroughly. Improperly added levels will get huffed (which job do you think is easier for me, add to 23 pages or delete 3 ^_^) --Splaka 04:16, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

{{langs}} also needs an edit for each added level. Having fun yet? :rolleyes: --Carlb 18:35, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ok, now am I done? --Bleach

Ahh, you forgot to reupdate the cache by giving a null edit all the user pages that have Template:Lang as well as.... kidding, you seem to be done. ^_^ --Splaka 22:15, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Obviously. With all those interesting words, I knew you were joking. --Duh

Actually, if you do something (like change the category in a template), you have to null edit (purge won't work) every page that has that template on it, to refresh the categories, the 'what links here', and other nonautomated aspects. See this. Although it doesn't pertain to this situation, so I was kidding. --Splaka 22:34, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Please stop messing with all the pre-existing lang templates (and all those other templates in general). Kthxbie. --Splaka 01:10, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

How do notice this stuff so quickly? Are you a bot? --Duh

You is are on my watchlist. Big Brother!!!eleven! --Splaka 01:13, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

That didn't answer my question. Oh, forget it.

sure

you can change the templates you made, or if you really think its constructive, any templates others have made. But DONT remove stuff or change stuff on other peoples templates without making sure its okay, and dont untag things for deletion. --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 22:53, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ok, making edits to site policy pages without community consensus is not a good thing. Also, editing Uncyclopedia:Vote for awards, decorations and honours (creating templates from the pending awards there) is not something you should do either. Those awards are awaiting consensus as to their future use and existance. You can vote on, or suggest awards, but not go through and create them. --Splaka 23:21, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I guess I shouldn't have made the template...but the things I said were just suggestions. --Me

The 'site policy' referred to things like this, not your suggestions on that page (which you can re-add, I reverted you for blanking the pseudo-template from that page). --Splaka 23:34, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

What, is there some sort of problem? Wait, never mind, I misunderstood --Me

Your Ban and You: Understanding Each Other

Greetings new banee - you seem to have some questions about your ban. As a newly banned individual, you are eligible for a comprehensive ban-breakdown, explaining your newfound benefit package. Here are some helpful tips:

These things are bad and got you banned:

• Adding Tired and overused quotes which we are sick of seeing on this site. Worse, you did it poorly.
• continuing to add tired and overused quotes.
• fixing up quotes instead of deleting them. (ok, that one's kinda lame)
• changing long-established rules for kitten huffing
• adding stupid crap to historical pages
• ruining point of template
• reverting admin revert on a template
• Fucking up all the Template:LangLevelText*** templates, and making Splaka revert them all.

The last two were serious ones, and really got you banned. Welcome to our shitlist. Now that you are unbanned, edit in quality, not quantity. Avoid messing with templates. If someone reverts your work, DO NOT change it back. This goes double plus times ten to the tenth power if it's an Admin who reverted the page.

If you can avoid making any more really stupid edits, we'll get along smashingly well. You should really read 10x more than you edit.

So, banee, in summary:

1. Don't mess with templates
2. Don't mess with policy pages
3. Don't spam pages with quotes or templates
4. Don't revert admin changes
5. Don't ruin good jokes or the point of pages with stupid edits

If you can do all this, you'll be on on your path to not being banned again! Good luck!!! Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 20:55, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

About my block

Ummm... is there any chance that one of the admins you talked to about my 12-hr block was Famine? (reply on my talk, plz) --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 20:32, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nope. Rcmurphy and Rangeley. They supported my 12 hour ban. (reply here). However, since Famine will ban you longer, you should listen to them instead. --Splaka 22:01, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

IWNH unblocked me (I know it's a little too late). --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 02:44, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Stop - Cease - Desist

I'll give you all the money in my wallet if you stop making useless, inane, and often inappropriate modifications to important documents and templates, AND ACTUALLY WRITE SOMETHING COMPLETELY ORIGINAL.

k?thx!bye.

a) Post your signature next time. b) It's just like Office Space. I make a mistake, and I have eight different people whine at me about it. EVERYBODY PLEASE JUST SHUT UP. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 02:44, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Me like Fortune Cookie

Love your Fortune Cookie randomiser..... :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Haha, thanks- make one for yourself if you want. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 12:34, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Already used the "Randomiser" code for the "Charlie Says..." on my User Page. Nicked the code from someone else a couple of weeks back. :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Ninjastar

You know, the idea of the stars is that someone else awards them to you when they notice your contributions, rather than conferring honours upon yourself like the dictator of a banana republic. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:37, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nyeh nyeh nyeh. Shut up. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 01:44, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Watch your mouth kid, or you're gonna find yourself floating home. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 01:54, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

It was a joke, jeez. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 01:55, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Great, now take it out of your sig #1, too. -- T. (talk) 02:00, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh. Forgot about that. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 02:09, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia

Nothing yet.

Wikicities

Also.