Uncyclopedia:VFP/ThatsNoMoonThatsWikipedia.jpg

Wikimoon? (history, logs, vote page)

Featured picture candidate
Gosh, Wikipedia is starting to get a little too big... Image credit: DaMenace Archive - Discuss this image

Vote	Score: 18
Nomination:
For Votes: 32	Self Nominate and a shameless vote For.--DaMenace 23:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC) For. Heh, just saw this, might wanna crop a bit though...   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC) For. –H. 01:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC) For, needs a larger caption though. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 01:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC) (Creator's note: I have made the caption larger now.) I meant the caption in the purple box, not on the image. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 03:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC) For--Surreal Hamster For Much better, that image is now officialy superb. --Olipro (Harass) 03:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Comment from creator: You mean remove "That's Wikipedia"? Would this make it better? Would people really get it then? --DaMenace 03:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Conditional for if "That's Wikipedia" is removed (and you got the quote wrong anyway, it was "That's no moon, it's a space station"). For. - Sikon 04:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Comment from creator: Ok, ok, ok...I've removed "That's Wikipedia". --DaMenace 04:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC) For its a cool pic, and it affirms our view on wikipedia *ptu ptu* (sound of me spitting, im not sure how to spell it) Raemie 12:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC) For.--Rataube 22:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC) For. Yeah, guys. This is just like Euroipods. Only not a single Wikideathstar has been featured, and we're into the dozens on Euroipods features...--<<>> 02:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC) For--Da, Y?YY?YYY?:-:CUN3 NotM BLK |_LG8+::: 10:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC) For, though I do think the wikipedia logo could be a little brighter. Doug 20:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC) For, if only to see that *one* of these gets featured, since it's a great concept and, as a bonus, we'll never see it in VFP again *coughmarxalotcough* --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 01:30, 5 April 2006 (UTC) For I like it. -- Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 14:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC) For. One million is a bit much. -Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes For. These aren't the droids you're looking for. Dzugavili 17:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC) For --Alia kenobi 20:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC) FOR /me headbangs --LinkTGF 21:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC) For I like it. --(~Sir)Nuke || Talk v MUN v Not An Admin v Completely Unimportant 22:33, 10 April 2006 (UTC) LeoFed Steve h anon32 02barryc George VI Joek1010 Bloopy Bldnghrtlbrl Eightball toratoritore Feureau Martinultima Garrett
Against Votes: 14	Weak Against I really like it but I don't see it as a featured image. --Mosquitopsu 01:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Against, possible for. If you put the caption IN the caption slot, I'll be happier. --Boy Toy bitch at me 02:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC) (Creator's note: Fixed it.) Comment I'm not saying I'd vote for it anyway, but I think "That's Wikipedia" should be excised from the internal caption. I feel strongly that it should. --—rc (t) 03:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Against --The Zombiebaron 13:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Against --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 13:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Against: Cute picture, got a chuckle out of me, but I really don't like how much it implies that we're wikipedia's annoying little brother; can't we just be our own wiki and not have to constantly poke at wikipedia to prove ourselves? --Sir gwax (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC) NEG-A-TIVE. I really wish this had come up sooner... before the Wiki Death Star idea was run into the ground. Now, I think the joke's too tired to warrant featuring. It's like the stinking iPod "Whatever" fad all over again, or the "Hitler du jour". Plus, there's little humor context aside from the tenuous relationship that Gwax mentioned, and he's right in saying we should not suggest that. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Against the image, but also against the reasons other people have for voting against. --Spin 22:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC) AgenstNO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO !!!!! FUCK NO--Private First Class Nappoleon V Talk Decorations 00:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC) AGAINST!!!!!!! --Kaizer_the_Bjorn [talk MUN F@H 22:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC) Ghelae Ianweller MoneySign Marco Raimey §ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ
Comments	Featured --Rcmurphy Sq.W (Talk) 03:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)