Uncyclopedia:VFP/Noob offensive.jpg

Noob-Friendly Almanack (history, logs, vote page)

Featured picture candidate
Chronicling every edit from every date between 20 April 2005 and 20 April 2006, the Newbie Friendly Uncyclopedia Almanack is the Uncyclopedia Noob's ultimate sourcepoint, written in such simple language that even the n00best of n00bs can comprehend such subjects as the Bermuda Triangle with ease. Image credit: Hindleyite Archive - Discuss this image

Vote	Score: 10
Nomination:
For Votes: 19	Self-nom and for. Time to face the firing squad... please don't be too brutal! --Hindleyite Talk 12:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC) Against. Bad photoshop. Some of the text looks like it's literally not attached to the book. Also, why yellow?--Anon32 13:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)For, now that it looks quite a bit better.--Anon32 20:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC) It's supposed to be a dust cover. Also it's a parody of the Wisden Almanack, which is yellow. Tell me which bits look bad so I can fix 'em. --Hindleyite Talk 16:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC) The words "edited by anonymous IPs" are fuzzy, and the oval thing on the side doesn't match the slant of the book.--Anon32 20:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC) Oh yeah, I just noticed that the book seems thicker at the top than the bottom.--Anon32 20:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC) For. --User:Nintendorulez 17:16, 7 May 2006 (UTC) For. I think the text on the spine of the book (left side of the image) needs to be curved to match the book. I don't see a problem with the book being thicker at the top, that's just perspective. The oval thing is fine, it's just the text on the oval which is a bit odd. Bloopy 01:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC) For --Spin 01:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC) For It has that strange beauty that only Wisden can provide ----Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC) For goes down well with me. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 08:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC) For cause I like tuna. --The Zombiebaron 02:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC) Against. Another one that just doesn't strike me as FUNNY. Well done, though.--<<>> 03:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC) Heh heh, ok. I'll bite. For.--<<>> 14:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC) Weak for. It's a very good picture but I'm not sure exactly how funny it is :/. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 15:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC) Anybody got any suggestions for any humorous edits etc. I can add to make it funnier? --Hindleyite Talk 15:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC) CommentI dunno... maybe if it boasted including things like, "tips and tricks to keep Famine and Splarka from banning you!" or "Tips of how to get your image from being murdered by voters at VFP", "list of inside jokes sure to get your article featured", "Users you should get to know", "Case studies of users that have been ostracized", or "Sunset/Sunrise times in UTC" could all be funny, potentially, off the top of my head.--<<>> 00:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC) For no comment --HP talk 18:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC) For! - Sikon 14:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC) For I think it's funny, so if you don't like it, die, die and go to hell! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 22:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC) For Five, Six, Seven . . . --Hrodulf 08:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC) codestream Zork Implementor L toratoritore Feureau Insineratehymn
Against Votes: 9	Against Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 03:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Against. Really. Really. Really no reason to vote against but none to vote for it either. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Comment so why did you vote? --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 08:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC) Because there was no reson to vote for, therefore it can't be all to good. You see? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC) Weak against.--Rataube 11:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC) its 'AAAAAAAAA!' there are nine As then an exclamation mark. Against; plus this image is crap IMO. --Anidn. Me? NO! MUN FC4 ⌘ .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 03:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC) whywhywhy Rcmurphy MoneySign DaMenace §ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ
Comments	Featured —rc (t) 03:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC) Weak Forgainst --Splaka 04:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Comment >:| —rc (t) 15:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Reply: Is that better? --Splaka 04:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)