Uncyclopedia:VFH/Wes Anderson

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wes Anderson (history, logs)

Article: Wes Anderson

Score: 6

Nominated by: Kip
For: 9
  1. Symbol for vote.svg N+4 -- Kip the Egg Easter egg.gif Talk Easter egg.gif Works Easter egg.gif 08:04, Jul. 18, 2014
  2. Symbol for vote.svg Confused writer for User:Matthlock/sig2 08:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol for vote.svg For. For the sheer levels of effort put in- maybe one day I will actually read it x - B@NZai k!tten BANZAI! (Meow?)B 14:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol for vote.svg For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 21:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol for vote.svg 4 ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 22:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  6. PurpleDickVote.svg Boner. Goddamn, uncyclopedia has very few masterpieces and this is one of them. For WesAndersonites like myself (although I haven't seen all his movies and skipped the stuff on those films) who get it, wow. Thanks for the experience, the ride, and the joy of seeing something really good here (I mean the tied-up girl). Aleister 1:42 5-8-14
  7. Symbol for vote.svg For. -- The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 08:15, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
  8. Symbol for vote.svg For. I love the middle when the author flips the shit and threatens to quit.  Special:Contribs/Sir Peasewhizz Sir Peasewhizz ... Biblio . HOS . Awards 03:06 8.18.14
  9. Symbol for vote.svg For. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 06:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Against: 3
  1. Symbol declined.svg Against. I'm gonna just come right out and say it. This ain't feature-quality. There are about ten articles in here, and I can't tell if that's because it's Done In The Style Of (I've only ever seen Rushmore, Moonrise Kingdom, and about half of The Royal Tenenbaums, and I'll be busted if I remember any of them), or if Matt just decided to write 100K characters on Wes Anderson because he's a troll. Has any of the other voters actually read this thing? Polish, man. Some polish. That's all I'm asking for.  ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngFri, Aug 8 '14 6:58 (UTC)
  2. I'm with BB on this one, unfortunately. It seems to vacillate too much between Written In The Style (which it's somewhat successful at doing, particularly with the credits and musical cues) and plain adoration-as-jokes (which is fumbles almost entirely. The Bottle Rocket section, for instance, lost me entirely, save for the line about Paraguay). The plot summaries and adoring-fan angles don't do the article any favors.The article seems to be at its best when it's digressing (i.e.: Paraguay!), but the sections on each movie become so sprawling that the jokes just get lost, or start to trip over each other. The Symmetry section seems to be a copy/paste of a buzzfeed article I read once without supplying its own original. The meta rant in "colors" would make heaps more sense within "inside jokes." Anyway, as I continued to read this article, I realized something very important: this article was quite unlike anything I've ever read on Uncyclopedia before. I cannot say that I laughed once, but I am very intrigued. It's like the Mulholland Drive of articles. But I still have to vote against it because plot summaries are boring. Argylesocks (talk) 01:23, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol declined.svg Against. Have to agree with TKF and BB. I would have written something like what TKF wrote but he already said it, and also no I wouldn't, because that would have taken a lot of effort. Matt, you're capable of turning this into something that's an Uncyc masterpiece, but explanations and fan praise are not funny and there's far too much of that in the present state. I don't mind its length, funny is funny whether it's a book or a one-liner. It just needs more polish at this point, though. -RAHB 22:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Kippy, what? User:Matthlock/sig2 08:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

chappelle-lil-jon-hhhwhat.gif
-- Kip the Egg Easter egg.gif Talk Easter egg.gif Works Easter egg.gif 08:28, Jul. 18, 2014
Nothing, Kip. Wrong speech. Thanks for nominating me, and even if this article only gets three votes, I'll be happy. Hey look! User:Matthlock/sig2 22:56, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH