From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Rotten Tomatoes
|
Score: 9 fresh tendrils
|
| Nominated by:
|
~ Kakun · talk 11:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
|
For: 9.5
|
- Honoring Chris Cornell with this self-nom. I think it's a pretty good site parody. ~ Kakun · talk 11:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 For. I've never been to this website, but it sounds like a good imitation.  LDA MyOwnBadSelf, 'Does it look different enough for y'all?' (talk - stalk - block) 00:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)- For. This article is rotten. -- MB 01:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ok he changed the thing about the thing ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- For. Format can be fixed up later. – roza (talk ☭ ctbs ☭ log) 18:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- tip. -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 18:25, Jun. 12, 2017
- This article is basically reviewing itself. 139.0.176.10 (talk) 03:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- For. Bit silly in places but still like it. Dr Funny (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- For. — SG1|Hereish [citation needed] 19:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- For. In these dark times, sometimes you need an article like this to look back on and say... "boy, we didn't expect us to fuck up 7 years later." RealLifeCartman (talk) 10:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
|
Against: 0.5
|
Against Injokes and also you wrote yourself into it.... The former is forgivable, the latter is not. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Against. 24.209.50.78 (talk) 22:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Frosty, I changed the problematic section, thanks. I originally tried to make this article look more than a random collection of jokes and it was not easy because of the format of RT. I hope you change your vote. ~ Kakun · talk 17:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Frosty. ~ Kakun · talk 03:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Wageslav, I tried updating the article to the "new and improved" RT format but their new site sucks so hard I couldn't even load the pages, so fuck it. The old format is more recognizable IMO. ~ Kakun · talk 19:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- I can update it since I have non-shit internet but considering the wiki format, it's going to be really hard to convert it to an article format. --RealLifeCartman (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, I did some updates, and I think it works. ~ Kakun · talk 15:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. I've never been to this website, but it sounds like a good imitation. 
Against. 