From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Leftism
|
Score: 7 fucking lefties
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sequence 03:36, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 11
|
- Nom and For I don't think there is any more ground for this article to cover, so it either stands on its own or gets abandonded like a geeky sibling at a concert. Sequence 03:36, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Leftist For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:39, 30 January 2010
- I voted for because it's the
right left thing to do. HELPME 05:41, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For.This is brilliant! I'm halfway through it and I'm filled with a great urge to vote. I'm now going to go back and finish reading the article. ~
     15:46, Jan 30, 2010
- For. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN16:04, 30 Jan
- For. A yes though I am puzzled why leftists are so positive about people driving on the right in the context of this article.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:01, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
- For. MrN
 10:37, Jan 31
- For. Sure!!! Funnybony 16:48, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
- For Sog1970 22:42, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
- For. It's okay.
 "MORDILLO IS FUCKING FASCIST" 17:39, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Lots of good work on the page, and creative graphics. There is nothing left to say. The pun also rises! Aleister in Chains 4:17 19 Feb. MMX
|
Against: 4
|
 Weak Against. It seems to be an article on how many puns can be fit into it. Not necessarily a bad thing, but to me it just didn't satisfy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 05:23, Jan 31 2010- Against. Factual inaccuracies and such. PM me for a detailed assessment. InMooseWeTrust 18:45, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. I could barely understand it. –Flashfreez 05:12, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. IronLung 03:16, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
Pee review is here. Sequence 03:36, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
- InMooseWeTrust: Er, pardon me for saying, but isn't this place for spreading misinformation? HELPME, I've fallen and I can't get up!/ Talk to me or die!/ My daddy!(ew) 18:50, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Dude, I honestly thought this is a good article, at least way better the article that is my first feature. I guess you attracted the ire of people who are more likely to vote "against" and not "abstain". ~ 04:13, Feb 19, 2010
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Weak Against. It seems to be an article on how many puns can be fit into it. Not necessarily a bad thing, but to me it just didn't satisfy. 
