Uncyclopedia:VFH/God's userpage

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

God's userpage (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: God's userpage	Score: 13.5 people who acknowledge me as the Supreme ruler of the Universe! Fear me!
Nominated by:	POP!GoesTheWeasel 03:38, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
For: 19.5	For. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 03:38, January 23, 2012 (UTC)  Two metaphysical thumbs up Liked this page since I first saw it. Creative, unique, funny, light hearted and has surprises if you follow the links. If it's featured it would also lead readers into seeing that uncy has an inner world of user pages, which some of them might explore and later join in the fun. Nice work, God. Aleister 10:05 23-1-'12  Wow, that was fast! Glad to see others like it (but, unfortunately, others don't). -- 13:40, January 23, 2012 (UTC) For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:27, January 23, 2012 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:36, 23 January 2012 For -- The Zombiebaron 14:39, January 23, 2012 (UTC)  Hilarious and very clever. Xamralco has great imagination to come up with such original concepts! Mattsnow 17:47, January 23, 2012 (UTC) It was a collaboration, Matt. I think Magic man thought of the idea. Or was it me? Or was it really Xamralco? Guess we'll never know. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 04:31, January 24, 2012 (UTC) I should have known, because you have to be a drug user to think about something like this :) Mattsnow 04:47, January 24, 2012 (UTC) For. What a fabulous collaboration. Great job guys!!!!!! ShabiDOO 22:14, January 24, 2012 (UTC) For could do some more with his talk page, though. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 13:21, January 26, 2012 (UTC) For. If it means me getting a feature, it means...uh...me getting a feature. PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 29 January 2012, at 02:11 :O I thought you said you's was dead! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:09, January 29, 2012 (UTC)  Lolz were had $Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 02:32, January 30, 2012 (UTC) Mild For. Although this joke has been done before, It is apparent that effort was put into it and there is a good amount of humour within the links and the template boxes. Two things I would suggest though is putting that one talkpage sentence which I assume is either Adam or Eve, first since they came before everyone else who leaves a message on the page. Second, a little more work on the front page, maybe a little more detail and something more professional than just "Hi. I'm God." That seemed a little cheesy and simple to me. Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   00:13, January 31, 2012 (UTC) For. I had promised to review this on VFH, but I failed in doing so, so this is the least I can do. ~Pleb the magic! 21:01, 01/31/2012  For.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 06:46, February 1, 2012 (UTC) I'm okay with this. -RAHB 03:33, February 3, 2012 (UTC) For. HAAA!!! Funnybony    15:11, Feb 4 15:11, February 4, 2012 (UTC)  For.. Good enough to receive my vote. Although the jokes aren't hilarious, there's a lot of them. User:Vodkelpplant 12:28, February 4, 2012 (UTC) For. MrN 18:10, Feb 6 For. 201.216.209.201 13:25, February 9, 2012 (UTC) For. The bit about Abraham was pure gold. QuackOfaThousandSuns 18:10, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 6	Against. I'll have to pass on this one ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:55, January 23, 2012 (UTC) Not really finding it funny; too in-jokey, wikiish, and full of bad web design. Might make sense as a sort of joke user, but a feature, not so much. Sorry. 1234 ~ 04:10, 23 January 2012Co Against. User:God... This person is God... Hi, I'm God... Between that and the creation references you had like 90% of the article. Sog's Mrs God's blog (ugh my tongue) just took this kind of idea to a whole other dimension of funny. Nikau 14:49, January 23, 2012 (UTC) Did you click any of the links in the box? All of the jokes are mainly spread among the subpages. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:51, January 23, 2012 (UTC) I did click them, but nothing happened. Guess it's an issue at my end. Withdraw vote until I can see the whole picture. --Nikau 15:15, January 23, 2012 (UTC) Against. I was just about to review this. Problem with having jokes spread over so many pages is that unless you said hey, click on this to see the funny I wouldn't click on it, so the joke isn't apparent. (Looking at the above some others feel the same.) I also think it's too in-jokey and a non-wiki user would miss most of the humour. It's non-encyclopaedic, and unlikely to be viewed by anyone searching for it. If it were God's Facebook page, then that may be different, and then most of the jokes could be in the one place. Problem is I've seen about 10 different God's facebook page parodies, and some of these jokes could have come directly from there. So overall, I like it, once you get beyond the first page there's some decent funny, but I can't see this as a featureable proposition as it is. Pup 12:11 24 Jan '12 12:11, January 24, 2012 (UTC)  Against. Per POTR. A little smart but not feature-worthy. Scofield & Friends 10:22, January 29, 2012 (UTC) Against per potr, come to think of it T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 14:28, January 31, 2012 (UTC) Against. Good, clever page, but I don't think it's slick or funny enough as a feature. Knucmo2 02:34, February 1, 2012 (UTC) Against. Ahoy...navelism.. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:18, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Whenever I click on the links it loads the back picture. Anyway, having seen the other 2 sub-pages, I enjoyed the awards page the most, especially the final ninjastar. Clever all round. The talk page went back over the typical jokes you hear about in any Bible parody, and the Ricky Martin thing was just a bit of an eehhh.--Nikau 15:26, January 23, 2012 (UTC) I made the image non-clickable. Hope that solves it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:52, 24 January 2012 Pretty clever stuff distributed in the subpages, which I have no problem with, but the actual page itself is pretty insubstantial. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 13:26, January 26, 2012 (UTC) Comment. If it were a single page wihich combined User page, awards, and talk (like User:Sannse) and only had the logs as different pages, then I'd be more inclined to vote for. Pup 02:39 29 Jan '12 02:39, January 29, 2012 (UTC) I combined the subpages with the main page since many people seem to prefer that. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:23, February 3, 2012 (UTC) I've removed my against vote. Also reviewed it as well. Pup 12:12 04 Feb '12

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---