U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology's Microcommittee on Telecommunications and Operations's Department of Medicine

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


“The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology's Microcommittee on Telecommunications and Operations's Department of Medicine is one of the most important departments of the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communication and Technology, almost exceeding the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation's Subcommittee on Communication, Economics, Energy, Transportation, Medicine, Military, Defense in numbers as high as the U.S.-- hey, wait, come back, I'm not done!”

Barack Obama on The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology's Microcommittee on Telecommunications and Operations's Department of Medicine
The former president's feeble attempts at mentioning its unholy name.

The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology's Microcommittee on Telecommunications and Operations's Department of Medicine is a major forerunner in the drive to maintain healthy conditions in the committee responsible for paying the phone bill of the committee that uses the internet of the committee that uses everyone's money and power.

History[edit | edit source]

Early Development[edit | edit source]

The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee first founded the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology in 2009 (61 AG). The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology's original name was the "U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet," but the subcommittee was eventually renamed after it was discovered that the subcommittee's full name could barely fit in a tweet.

The rise and fall of the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology[edit | edit source]

Once it became obvious that the outrageously long name of the subcommittee could be used to facilitate filibustering in new and exciting ways, many prominent Fascist parties in the United States began using it as a method of taking control of the legislature and therefore the government. This power struggle continued for several months until the Dissolvement of the Subcommittee Monopoly Act of 2010.

Once the subcommittee formed a monopoly over the United States Congress, legislature was passed to divide the subcommittee and weaken their monopoly over overly long names, resulting in many of their responsibilities being diverted into microcommittees, such as the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology's Microcommittee on Telecommunications and Operations. The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology's Microcommittee on Telecommunications and Operations acted as a successor state to the Subcommittee's throne, following the loss of the subcommittee's mandate of heaven. In the Congressia civil war following the subcommittee's dissolution, the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology's Microcommittee on Telecommunications and Operations maintained a majority control over the territory within the US Congressional building, and soon became a microstate within Washington D.C.