Talk:Mr. Kearsy

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Why was this vanity article featured? --General Insineratehymn 05:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

First edit: (cur) (last) 12:43, 28 May 2007 The Thinker (Talk | contribs) (this page is NOT VANITY. It is a parody of people who, for some reason, feel the need to laud their teachers as if it were a sign of status.) ЖGBDsig.PNG WHEEEEE! 05:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
HAH.. Thanks Kalir. ;) --THINKER 05:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
OK, that explains everything. --General Insineratehymn 06:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

This was pretty funny, I like the ending "conviction" part. Mightywayne 14:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The ending seems a little out of key with the rest of this article...is this intentional? Because the style of humour changes dramatically (the paedophile part, to clarify).--Horacetheinfinitesneeze 22:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

That was an add-on; it's been reverted, unfortunately for Mightywayne. But then, that's why we have edit history, no? — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey! That was just about the only thing I liked about this crap! - Guest

From Pee[edit source]

Mr. Kearsy[edit source]

*sigh* I think this one is one of my funniest so far. And I think it has extremely high potential for misinterpretation. Anyway, have at it. --THINKER 20:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 10 Don't get how it could be misinterpreted. The humor is really good. Some may not like the bluntness, but see the concept section.
Concept: 10 This is WHAT makes the humor really good. It's a different sort of first-person narrative with the angle of a stoned high school student. The length works too, since many high-schoolers today have the attention span and patience of a fish.
Prose and formatting: 9 Not much to say. Works well with the concept.
Images: 9 Really like the images and the captions. Especially the girlfriend...ESPECIALLY the girlfriend.
Miscellaneous: 9 Seriously...they need a section to describe what this item is about.
Final Score: 47 There really isn't anything negative I can say about the article. If you're worried about people reading it wrong, it would only be from somewhat blunt humo(u)r. It's really good. WERD UP, BOI!!!!111
Reviewer: --Mr.Vib 16:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)