Talk:Do NOT click any links!

You can click talk page without anything happening. NOOO! YOU JUST CLICKED ON A LINK! WHAT DID I TELL YOU!!!???? 203.97.255.167 22:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I did not. I pointed my browser to talk:do not click any links on my own.199.126.227.65 01:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I used alt+shift+t. --213.178.102.10 11:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I pressed tab and then enter on the keyboard... --72.253.255.47 05:35, February 23, 2011 (UTC)

Cherry Cake?

I know a lot of sites filled with shock images, but I can't say I've ever heard of any "Cherry Cake". Since I'm a sap for visual pain, I'd like a link. I was able to handle the entirity of Moid in a span of merely 2 days with my retinas intact, I doubt that Cherry Cake could be too bad. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 21:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk to the Village Idiot, he won't stop sending the link to me, and I refuse to type it in by hand, out of fear I'll click it (I've seen shocking images, thank you).--<<>> 22:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Take a look at here. [1]--Tache 11:10, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Does someone want to make a custom {{ArticleFH}} tag for this page? --—rc (t) 04:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm... that was short-lived, well sort of: {{ArticleFH}} is deprecated with the creation of {{FA}}, so the custom text has been cut-and-pasted into a copy of the new template. --Carlb 18:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Featured?

How did this crap get to be featured? It's just a cheap ripoff of the Do not Press This Red Button flash thing that's been lurking around the web for a few years now.

Even that wasn't funny so much as it was boring.

Do not press the red button: http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=9644

83.67.4.159 12:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

This is the author. Thank you for your comments. This article seems to make polarize people, as they either love it or hate it. There was a story behind it... well, the short version is that I clicked goatse by being too curious. This article was written right afterward, from a "once bitten, twice shy" POV. The click links were added later by a different author, and I think they're more an homage to the link you provided than a "cheap rip-off", but I don't know any better than you do. The editor that added that could have just come up with a similar idea on their own, and it doesn't go to the extent of that red button link because he the joke dies after a certain point. That's my take on it, anyway. Thanks for reading my article!--<<>> 18:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

LOTS of games have been made in the style of Red Button. Given the text and such are substantially different, and it uses the kind of things that could only be done with a wiki, I would hardly call it a "cheap ripoff". --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

One rarely comes across red buttons, and hence one is relatively safe. But links... links are everywhere, it's near impossible to hide from links. Wikis have links everywhere, they're like a warzone. Bloopy 08:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

And even if it was a "ripoff", as you claim, what about the main article? That's an excellent article. Besides, one prime difference between this and Red Button is how Red Button loops at the end, while this can just get longer and longer. Those who click to the end can add their own next bits. And there's a lot of Uncyc in-jokes, and wiki tricks involved (such as the parts where you have to manually change the URL. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 18:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Keys

Is using keys to navigate links just as dangerous as clicking them? Just curious. Bloopy 12:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

In all honesty, I'm too gunshy to even attempt it. You can feel free, and let me know how it turns out, but don't say I didn't warn you. Links, like dirty bombs, are difficult to handle, and handling them at all could doom you in the end. It's up to you, you're taking your life in your hands. FEAR THE INTERNET!--> Correspondent Brad Frasier (Jesusland) CUN [talk]   14:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

I got up to click 5, where it say a Goatse will be planted on the next page. (Is there really a Goatse there?)--Nelson340 19:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

I got up to click 100.

Hamster6 • [talk]

It wouildn't be any fun if I told you, would it? (And there'd better not be, there wasn't the last time I checked...)--<<>> 19:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

No, it's harmless. So far, at least... --User:Nintendorulez 19:43, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, would a user get banned if he added a picture from a shock site to an article? --Testicles 21:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes. The article's intent is to serve as a paranoid warning, where you're always expecting to run into something shocking, but never do.--<<>> 22:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't believe you.

There should be at least one goatse. Or better yet, this ingenious plan...

Try a GIF image that stays the same for like 60 seconds and then changes to Goatse. Muhahaha!

There is one, on goatse site's contribs section, called Magic Eye which changes after 16 seconds. Don't ask me how I know that.

Hamster6 • [talk]

The FDR Quote

The "Quote" from FDR on the main page appears to have been taken from "Our Dumb Century" a book by the publishers of The Onion either in part or whole, shouldn't it be sourced? It likely qualifies as fair use and/or parody, but I just thought I'd mention... 129.89.68.218 01:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Index of all subpages!

[2]

Some of this stuff's pretty clever... --User:Nintendorulez 20:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

This is only #7?

Jeez! This is an injustice. This should be Number ^#1. *Grumbles murderously violent things about Captain Obvious.* -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

So if it's true that none of the links are actually "bad"...

... shouldn't the "Warning" go to the next level, and the article be put in total permanant lockdown? Otherwise, the gag doesn't quite work, because someone's always bound to link it to goatse or wherever. Or am I missing something?--Lenoxus 18:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, certain people are watching this article to make sure that doesn't happen. We're doing what we can to ensure that doesn't happen without completely shutting down the page.--<<>> 19:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Come to think of it, what I was missing was my faith in the Internet community. Thanks. --Lenoxus 21:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I suddenly have deja vu...

Hmm... just wondering, isn't that picture of windows crashing from uncyclopedia? hehe, I also love it. 124.120.117.222 06:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, wait. I thought I was still on Wikipedia. These goddamn links are so seamless! 124.120.117.222 06:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

WHAT!

Why is it it just ends at 7. I used search and found 8 whichs goes to 15 I think. Then I serached for 16 and when to...33(?) And kept going. I think it stops somewhere in the 50s. And there are ones in between that aren't even created. Why not create them all and just link them all together until the last one! Then say that it is the last one. Eh? 68.239.241.213 23:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Because it's funny to see who would editsthe URL or search for #8, going to a ridiculous length just to see the end of the game.81.96.167.246 21:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I clicked a link & it hurt

Take this, you deserve it. I'm handing em out to everyone.

You have been rated R.

You could have been totally scarred for life, right there!

scarred for life links to Zombies. NO GOOD, SIR!

Too bad

I clicked on a link anyways. What are you gonna do about it motherfunkers!? Eh?!?!? 24.250.1.196 23:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

I will make you ASPLODE!!! BOOM!!!!!!!!

Spockezri

Remember to turn of font colors...~ 00:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Quick Question

Aren't the images links?-24.6.56.121 22:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

They are...~ 00:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

i post hear cuz i can

Anyone mind if I change the spans so it looks like it links to what it looks like it's supposed to link to? (God, what a mouthful.) i.e. 4chan to 4chan

*faithfully awaiting reply*

I'm waiting... --I like pie... I just happen to... really!/Spam me/Spam doesn't taste as good as pie 03:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

*no response* - Anonymous

As they say on Wikipedia "Be italic when editing pages." I don't know what it means, but I guess you can, or whatever.--<<>> 11:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll try... see what happens. :/ (If I mess up someones going to revert me anyway) --I like pie mmm (^{Spam me/Spam doesn't taste as good as pie}) X Block

The universe is thanking you.

03:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

How come there's only 115 clicks? And I think there should be a more interesting ending to this game. 65.92.127.31 17:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Huh?

Exactly what DOES happen when you click on a link in the article? You guys just act like it's a game, don't click on the links, or you lose. It's like a test of curiosity. Oh, wait, it IS a test of curiosity.

First, please sign your posts. Second, you're actually SUPPOSED to click the links. --Invincibleflamegruemaster 04:54, Nov 15 2009

list

orphan list please--173.49.239.254 17:10, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

What happened to the game?

Seriously, the whole thing is gone, making the article somewhat pointless... it was somewhat amusing to be honest, but it's all gone, all of it.. why? seriously, why? --71.72.61.144 22:44, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

And this, kids, is why you need to be specific around some people. And around things like VFD. *shifty eyes* Oops? 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 23:12, 2 January, 2011 (UTC)

I liked the game. And from the VFD, only some of the pages were bad. Why couldn't we have removed the bad ones and collapsed the game? ~ 08:38, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Agreed, I actually enjoyed the game, no matter how stupid it may be. I wanted to play it again, only to reach a dead end...--112.205.219.199 05:48, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

hi

this is fun wvandzm, the saviour of colours | talk to me | 17:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)