Forum:Unvoyage

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Unvoyage

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4075 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I just had an awesome idea. Wikimedia's launching Wikivoyage, and i just had an idea. We could create a namespace called UnVoyage, as a parody of Wikivoyage. It would have fake troll/funny/satirical travel guides and etc. ZB could make the logo since he's a tool. If you have other Ideas for this namespace, put them in your vote below. Vote whether we should have this namespace. Admin votes count as 1.5

Vote

Score: Congratulations, go make it now

1.  For. —  (talk) (contributions) Jan 22 2013 20:13.
2. I don't see the point in creating a forum vote for every single thing, but this is actually a very good idea. I could see a number of silly and off-the-wall sorts of things that could happen in a namepsace devoted to travel. "Go south toward Brisbane, keeping an eye out for poachers, and be sure to hang a left at the 50 ft. statue of James Joyce made entirely out of breakfast cereal." -RAHB 20:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
3. Just do it. Per RAHB, you don't need permission always, but it's worth keeping this open for visibility and all that good stuff. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
4.  For - We vote because wiki editors never go outside. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 21:09, Jan. 22, 2013
5.  For. Let's move UnTravel to UnVoyage. --EMC ^[TALK] 18:13 Jan 24 2013
6.  For. but retain the UnTravel/UnVoyage names to parody the Wikitravel/Wikivoyage split and fork. This needs to be a namespace as UnVoyage/New Jersey just gives a subpage with UnVoyage as parent region, which breaks the fake breadcrumbs. Carlb (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
7.  For. useless pile-on support for obviously good idea. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:14, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I made the namespace and moved everything into it. I'll add the logo soon. Legoktm (talk) 07:53, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Vote on voting on things

Score: +1 People who think we don't need to vote on things anymore, we can now be the change we want to see in the world

1.  Redundant, superfluous, and unnecessary for I don't think we need to vote on things to do them, so this is the vote that we don't need to vote on things to do them.--<<>> 02:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
2. Completely necessary against. If we didn't hold votes for every action before we actionate them, then how can we know that our actions are actionable in the first place? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)