Forum:The English language Uncyclopedia thanks its contributors for creating over 150,000,000 articles!

Forums: Index > Village Dump > The English language Uncyclopedia thanks its contributors for creating over 150,000,000 articles!

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6172 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Congratulations, people, on hitting the 150 million mark, good work everybody!

On a somewhat related issue, which I'm 100% sure has been brought up before (so please don't attack me), I noticed that we don't have a link to Uncyclopedia's featured content on the sidebar as Wikipedia has. Maybe we could add it to make the best Uncyclopedia has to offer even more prominent. What say you people? -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

NO! Err, I mean, yes.--Procopius 14:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

How'd we go from 105 just yesterday to that many so fast? Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Oh god. Is the ticker glitched horribly again? --General Insineratehymn 17:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Guess so, since Special:statistics says we have about 19,500 pages of legitimate content. --~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

19:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

...and 149980500 pages of bastardised content?

You might want to check out wikipedia's main page today... that might explain it. --Sir Jam 20:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia...is that like a parody of Uncyc?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

It's like a parody, yes. --Sir Jam 22:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps the 150+ million should be added into MediaWiki:Sitestatstext too. G.He_(Talk!) 03:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Heh, that'd be awesome. Just do something like this: "150037443 articles in English." - *checks main page to see if I have the sentence formed right*... Holy crap, the main page already has that lovely little piece of arithmetic! Now we just need it on the Special: pages and crap. --User:Nintendorulez 03:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

...must be FFW backlash...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

It's called Uncyclopedia:Best of. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I know. We don't necessarily need any new fancy Dan 'Featured Content' pages - the Best Of page is fine as it is. But I thought it might be good to have a link to it on the sidebar. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia

For Side bar. Also this may be a good place to bring up my idea that be put little ninjastars at the top of featured pages (instead of that stupid Featured thing behind the logo) kind of like Wikipedia's barnstar thing. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Why don't we put a ninja in there instead? 80.229.160.127 19:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Or how about a Clinja? Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I think that a ninjastar would be better, cause it is our version of the barnstar --Sir Zombiebaron 01:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I like the "Featured" thing. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I think the green Featured.png image would look good where WP puts its barnstars, especially since it's the image we've used to denote featured content for a long time already. —rc (t) 08:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)