Forum:Pee Review: The Solution?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Pee Review: The Solution?
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6317 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

OK, a lot of people have been complaining that their entries on Pee Review have received little or no attention, I being one of those people. Now, i hardly ever frequent Pee Review, so i have no idea what's going on over there, but generally, when i do go there for advice, i am met with sheer apathy. Now, here's my potential solution: establish a rule that, in order to create a new Pee Review entry, one must respond to at least one other entry already in place; that way, people can actually get their desperately needed reviews, even if it is forced . Sounds good to me, but I want to get more opinions and maybe actually get it done. --Señor DiZtheGreat Honor me! CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Dump vs Pee Review

In spite of the rule that feedback for an article shouldn't be asked in the VD, people who brake that rule recieve more attention and advice that those who correctly post in Pee Review. So one option would be, kill that rule, maybe it makes more harm than good (I know it has downsides, just a thought). Another option is to link the VD to Pee Review in the same way it links to the ministry of love and benson's forum (who also get much attentin). I know Pee Review is alredy linked to from everywhere, but it's still worth trying I think.---Asteroid B612B612.jpg (aka Rataube) - Ñ 21:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

List of suggestions

All suggestions until now. Comment bellow with "::".

  • Force reviewing before candidating;
  • Estabilishing an award for good reviewers;
  • Estabilishing a expiration time for reviews;
  • Showing the review's author in a column;
  • Making the entries disappear from the page when the Thanks! template is added;
Personally, I think this one is the most useful. I check out the review fairly often, and it would be nice to get those cleared. Maybe instead of a time limit, just have a certain acceptable amount of time elapse before someone else is able to add the thanks template. Lemon. Lemonwedge.gif 01:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Allowing users to review articles in Village Dump;
  • Linking Pee Review to the subforums of Village Dump;

herr doktor needsAbeam Rocket.gif [scream!] 21:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Establish "pee committee"

--~ Tophatsig.png

02:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)