Forum:I have devised a plausible solution to allow UNCYCLOPEDIA to come forth back into the public eye, and renew its long lost golden era. (Now with fancy words)

Forums: Index > Village Dump > I have devised a plausible solution to allow UNCYCLOPEDIA to come forth back into the public eye, and renew its long lost golden era. (Now with fancy words)

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5365 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

We must feast upon the fleshes of those who came before us! I am speaking to you, all so-called noobs. Rise up! Tear down the walls of the vile despots who have stood in your way up to this point. Take them in for nourishment, drinketh from their milky bosoms, and be quenched. Take in their knowledge of great times past, have your way with their ability to ramble on and on about said times, wear their styles as your own, and you shall be free. Yes-Yes! Brains! Brains! BRAINS! The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 11:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Hark! Are you suggesting that we allow the peasantry to take control of all we have worked to create? Surely we will open the floodgates to vandalistic anarchy! Or am I merely misreading your prose so purple? BlueYonder - CONTACT

Uncyclopedians of the world, unite! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Feed on any other brains you so wish, but me and Mordillo have first dibs on Cajek's, if the bugger ever comes back. --UU - natter 13:04, Feb 11

Errrmmm... about Cajek... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Rhode Island is neither a road or an Island.....discuss

Woody is engaging in an activity that I refer to as "ambiguous insultery". Is he making fun of X or Y? What does Z have to say about all of this?

Watch, I'll try a little.........

My fellow noobs, (2 months 30 days here) obviously the golden days of Uncyclopedia are forever lost and the writers and admins that remain from this era are the experts that we must latch ourselves onto like hungry Lampreys - awaiting those nutritious comedic bits that float downstream after their literary kills. Times are tough. In the past 12 months, all of the NOTM were so clearly lacking in talent that Rcmurphy was rightfully awarded NOTY. We must all prostate ourselves and come to the realization of just how bad we suck and how Uncyclopedia is going downhill because of our grade school level writing and humor.

I think Woody does it better--    12:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

All new stuff sucks by virtue of being too new. All old stuff sucks by virtue of being too old. All other stuff sucks by virtue of being wishy-washy in-between stuff. In conclusion: Uncyclopedia is the worst. Thank you for your time. --UU - natter 13:02, Feb 11

Man, that is deep. Ambiguous insultery? I thank you for thinking so highly of me to believe I had concocted such a plan. My true idea was this: "Aww, wouldn't it be funny if I told people to eat some of the older uncyclopedians? *Guffaw*" The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 22:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, I think you've pretty much riled them up anyway. Nice job. You're paying for the teargas. BlueYonder - CONTACT

See? That's the beauty of ambiguous insultery. There's a whole list of possible meanings that you can use to explain the reasoning behind the post after the fact. Woody could have just as easily said that he was hungry and brains sounded good at the time.--    08:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Admins!

Admins don't let your brains be sucked up by n00bs! Instead, lead the revolution! Lead us to world domination! Uncyclopedia shall rule the world! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay. R (Holla!) 00:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm

Not actually a noob. In fact, I've known Uncyclopedia longer than the other pseudo-noob, Rcmurphy. Like, I started editing stuff here in mid-2005 under my original account. So yeah, awkward pause and stripping of award ensues. --Nachlader 13:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Gasp!* • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:17, Feb 11

Whereas I'm

Most definitely a noob. I joined the site three days ago, and used my computer hacking skills to create myself a fictional history of contributions. pillow talk 22:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh yeah? Well I deleted every single mention of "Nachlader" before I 'registered' once more. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

tl;dr

Title was too long. :3 - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 17:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Plausible solution allow UNCYCLOPEDIA back into public eye, renew long lost golden era. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 19:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Get SPANG SUPPORT for Uncyclopedia

It made me whole again. And perky. ~ 08:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Well...

I personally feel that the best way to get Uncyclopedia back out in the world is by word of mouth. Other than that we have advertisment which is expensive as a silicon woman.

I am Justice! aka: Halsoft.

Needs more headlines with only one comment below it

Done. --Nachlader 17:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

I wonder how easy it would be to ruin that one?

I am Justice! aka: Halsoft.

Needs more Obama-centric material

"I scratched my knee, and my mom kissed it all better. Then she gived me a wowiepop! Yay!"

Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:39, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Like this? Verp 05:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)